Literature DB >> 27034315

Turbulence in blood damage modeling.

Leonid Goubergrits1,2, Jan Osman1, Ricardo Mevert1, Ulrich Kertzscher1, Kai Pöthkow3, Hans-Christian Hege3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To account for the impact of turbulence in blood damage modeling, a novel approach based on the generation of instantaneous flow fields from RANS simulations is proposed.
METHODS: Turbulent flow in a bileaflet mechanical heart valve was simulated using RANS-based (SST k-ω) flow solver using FLUENT 14.5. The calculated Reynolds shear stress (RSS) field is transformed into a set of divergence-free random vector fields representing turbulent velocity fluctuations using procedural noise functions. To consider the random path of the blood cells, instantaneous flow fields were computed for each time step by summation of RSS-based divergence-free random and mean velocity fields. Using those instantaneous flow fields, instantaneous pathlines and corresponding point-wise instantaneous shear stresses were calculated. For a comparison, averaged pathlines based on mean velocity field and respective viscous shear stresses together with RSS values were calculated. Finally, the blood damage index (hemolysis) was integrated along the averaged and instantaneous pathlines using a power law approach and then compared.
RESULTS: Using RSS in blood damage modeling without a correction factor overestimates damaging stress and thus the blood damage (hemolysis). Blood damage histograms based on both presented approaches differ.
CONCLUSIONS: A novel approach to calculate blood damage without using RSS as a damaging parameter is established. The results of our numerical experiment support the hypothesis that the use of RSS as a damaging parameter should be avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27034315     DOI: 10.5301/ijao.5000476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Artif Organs        ISSN: 0391-3988            Impact factor:   1.595


  2 in total

1.  Large-Eddy Simulations of Flow in the FDA Benchmark Nozzle Geometry to Predict Hemolysis.

Authors:  Nicolas Tobin; Keefe B Manning
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.495

2.  Hemolytic Performance in Two Generations of the Sputnik Left Ventricular Assist Device: A Combined Numerical and Experimental Study.

Authors:  Alexandra N Romanova; Alexander A Pugovkin; Maxim V Denisov; Ivan A Ephimov; Dmitry V Gusev; Marian Walter; Thomas Groth; Olga L Bockeria; Tatyana G Le; Anna S Satyukova; Sergey V Selishchev; Dmitry V Telyshev
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2022-01-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.