| Literature DB >> 27034243 |
Geraint Fuller1, Cathy Morgan1.
Abstract
In this article we will explore the mimics and chameleons of Bell's palsy and in addition argue that we should use the term 'Bell's palsy syndrome' to help guide clinical reasoning when thinking about patients with facial weakness. The diagnosis of Bell's palsy can usually be made on clinical grounds without the need for further investigations. This is because the diagnosis is not one of exclusion (despite this being commonly how it is described), a lower motor neurone facial weakness where all alternative causes have been eliminated, but rather a positive recognition of a clinical syndrome, with a number of exclusions, which are described below. This perhaps would be more accurately referred to a 'Bell's palsy syndrome'. Treatment with corticosteroids improves outcome; adding an antiviral probably reduces the rates of long-term complications. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.Entities:
Keywords: CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27034243 DOI: 10.1136/practneurol-2016-001383
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pract Neurol ISSN: 1474-7758