Colette J Shen1, Megan N Kummerlowe1, Kristin J Redmond1, Daniele Rigamonti2, Michael K Lim3, Lawrence R Kleinberg4. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland; Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: kleinla@jhmi.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the prevalence, outcomes, and toxicities of concurrent delivery of systemic therapy with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for treatment of brain metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a retrospective review of 193 patients treated at our institution with SRS without prior whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for brain metastases between 2009 and 2014. Outcome metrics included administration of concurrent systemic therapy, myelosuppression, neurotoxicity, and survival. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-three patients with a median age of 61 years underwent a total of 291 SRS treatments. Thirty-seven percent of SRS treatments were delivered concurrently with systemic therapy, of which 46% were with conventional myelosuppressive chemotherapy, and 54% with targeted and immune therapy agents. Myelosuppression was minimal after treatment with both systemic therapy and SRS, with 14% grade 3-4 toxicity for lymphopenia and 4-9% for leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Neurotoxicity was also minimal after combined therapy, with no grade 4 and <5% grade 3 toxicity, 34% dexamethasone requirement, and 4% radiation necrosis, all similar to treatments with SRS alone. Median overall survival was similar after SRS alone (14.4 months) versus SRS with systemic therapy (12.9 months). In patients with a new diagnosis of primary cancer with brain metastasis, early treatment with concurrent systemic therapy and SRS correlated with improved survival versus SRS alone (41.6 vs 21.5 months, P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Systemic therapy can be safely given concurrently with SRS for brain metastases: our results suggest minimal myelosuppression and neurotoxicity. Concurrent therapy is an attractive option for patients who have both intracranial and extracranial metastatic disease and may be particularly beneficial in patients with a new diagnosis of primary cancer with brain metastasis.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the prevalence, outcomes, and toxicities of concurrent delivery of systemic therapy with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for treatment of brain metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a retrospective review of 193 patients treated at our institution with SRS without prior whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for brain metastases between 2009 and 2014. Outcome metrics included administration of concurrent systemic therapy, myelosuppression, neurotoxicity, and survival. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-three patients with a median age of 61 years underwent a total of 291 SRS treatments. Thirty-seven percent of SRS treatments were delivered concurrently with systemic therapy, of which 46% were with conventional myelosuppressive chemotherapy, and 54% with targeted and immune therapy agents. Myelosuppression was minimal after treatment with both systemic therapy and SRS, with 14% grade 3-4 toxicity for lymphopenia and 4-9% for leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Neurotoxicity was also minimal after combined therapy, with no grade 4 and <5% grade 3 toxicity, 34% dexamethasone requirement, and 4% radiation necrosis, all similar to treatments with SRS alone. Median overall survival was similar after SRS alone (14.4 months) versus SRS with systemic therapy (12.9 months). In patients with a new diagnosis of primary cancer with brain metastasis, early treatment with concurrent systemic therapy and SRS correlated with improved survival versus SRS alone (41.6 vs 21.5 months, P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Systemic therapy can be safely given concurrently with SRS for brain metastases: our results suggest minimal myelosuppression and neurotoxicity. Concurrent therapy is an attractive option for patients who have both intracranial and extracranial metastatic disease and may be particularly beneficial in patients with a new diagnosis of primary cancer with brain metastasis.
Authors: Ammoren E Dohm; Ryan Hughes; William Wheless; Michael Lecompte; Claire Lanier; Jimmy Ruiz; Kounosuke Watabe; Fei Xing; Jing Su; Christina Cramer; Adrian Laxton; Stephen Tatter; Michael D Chan Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2018-10-26 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Maikel Verduin; Jaap D Zindler; Hanneke M A Martinussen; Rob L H Jansen; Sander Croes; Lizza E L Hendriks; Danielle B P Eekers; Ann Hoeben Journal: Oncologist Date: 2017-02-06
Authors: Pierre-Yves Borius; Jean Régis; Alexandre Carpentier; Michel Kalamarides; Charles Ambroise Valery; Igor Latorzeff Journal: Cancer Metastasis Rev Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 9.264
Authors: Joseph M Kim; Jacob A Miller; Rupesh Kotecha; Roy Xiao; Aditya Juloori; Matthew C Ward; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Alireza M Mohammadi; David M Peereboom; Erin S Murphy; John H Suh; Gene H Barnett; Michael A Vogelbaum; Lilyana Angelov; Glen H Stevens; Samuel T Chao Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2017-04-22 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Balamurugan A Vellayappan; Tresa McGranahan; Jerome Graber; Lynne Taylor; Vyshak Venur; Richard Ellenbogen; Andrew E Sloan; Kristin J Redmond; Matthew Foote; Samuel T Chao; John H Suh; Eric L Chang; Arjun Sahgal; Simon S Lo Journal: Curr Treat Options Oncol Date: 2021-06-07
Authors: Michael T Milano; Jimm Grimm; Andrzej Niemierko; Scott G Soltys; Vitali Moiseenko; Kristin J Redmond; Ellen Yorke; Arjun Sahgal; Jinyu Xue; Anand Mahadevan; Alexander Muacevic; Lawrence B Marks; Lawrence R Kleinberg Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2020-09-11 Impact factor: 8.013