Literature DB >> 27033312

A new extensile anterolateral retroperitoneal approach for lumbar interbody fusion from L1 to S1: a prospective series with clinical outcomes.

Sean Molloy1, Joseph S Butler2, Adam Benton1, Karan Malhotra1, Susanne Selvadurai3, Obiekezie Agu4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: A variety of surgical approaches have been used for cage insertion in lumbar interbody fusion surgery. The direct anterior approach requires mobilization of the great vessels to access the intervertebral disc spaces cranial to L5/S1. With the lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach, it is difficult to access the L4/L5 intervertebral disc space due to the lumbar plexus and iliac crest, and L5/S1 is inaccessible. We describe a new anterolateral retroperitoneal approach, which is safe and reproducible to access the disc spaces from L1 to S1 inclusive, obviating the need for a separate direct anterior approach to access L5/S1.
PURPOSE: This paper had the following objectives: first, to report a reproducible novel single-incision, muscle-splitting, anterolateral pre-psoas surgical approach to the lumbar spine from L1 to S1; second, to highlight the technical challenges of this approach and highlight approach-related complications; and third, to evaluate clinical outcomes using this surgical technique in a prospective series of L1 to S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusions (ALIFs) performed as part of a 360-degree fusion for adult spinal deformity correction. STUDY
DESIGN: This report used a prospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A prospective series of patients (n=64) having ALIF using porous tantalum cages as part of a two-stage complex spinal reconstruction from L1 to S1 were studied. OUTCOME MEASURES: Data collected included blood loss, operative time, incision size, technical challenges, perioperative complications, and secondary procedures. Clinical outcome measures used included visual analogue scale (VAS) Back Pain, VAS Leg Pain, EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), EQ-5D VAS, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22).
METHODS: Pre- and postoperative radiographic parameters and clinical outcome measures were assessed. Mean follow-up time was 1.8 years.
RESULTS: Mean blood loss was 68±9.6 mL. The mean VAS Back Pain score improved from 7.5±1.25 preoperatively to 2.5±1.7 at 3 months (p=.02), 1.2±0.5 at 6 months (p=.01), and 1.4±0.6 at 1 year (p=.02). The mean ODI improved from 64.3±31.8 preoperatively to 16.6±14.7 at 3 months (p>.05), 10.7±6.0 at 6 months (p=.02), and 6.7±6.1 at 1 year (p=.01). There were no permanent neurologic, vascular, or visceral injuries. One revision anterior procedure was required on a patient with rheumatoid arthritis and advanced systemic disease that sustained a sacral fracture and required revision ALIF at L5/S1.
CONCLUSIONS: The technique described is a safe, new, muscle-splitting, psoas-preserving, one-incision approach to provide access from L1 to S1 for multilevel anterior or oblique lumbar interbody fusion surgery.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult spinal deformity; Anterior lumbar interbody fusion; Anterolateral approach; Lumbar interbody fusion; Retroperitoneal

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27033312     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.03.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  15 in total

1.  Perioperative Complications in 255 Patients Who Underwent Lateral Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LaLIF) Surgery.

Authors:  Jiaming Cui; Xingyu Guo; Zhaomin Zheng; Hui Liu; Hua Wang; Zemin Li; Jianru Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Complications and Prevention Strategies of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Technique.

Authors:  Zhong-You Zeng; Zhao-Wan Xu; Deng-Wei He; Xing Zhao; Wei-Hu Ma; Wen-Fei Ni; Yong-Xing Song; Jian-Qiao Zhang; Wei Yu; Xiang-Qian Fang; Zhi-Jie Zhou; Nan-Jian Xu; Wen-Jian Huang; Zhi-Chao Hu; Ai-Lian Wu; Jian-Fei Ji; Jian-Fu Han; Shun-Wu Fan; Feng-Dong Zhao; Hui Jin; Fei Pei; Shi-Yang Fan; De-Xiu Sui
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.071

3.  Segmental Contributions to Lumbar Lordosis: A Computed Tomography Study.

Authors:  Joseph F Baker; Peter A Robertson
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

4.  Oblique retroperitoneal approach for lumbar interbody fusion from L1 to S1 in adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Ki-Tack Kim; Dae-Jean Jo; Sang-Hyun Lee; Eun-Min Seo
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 5.  Complications on minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion at L2-L5 levels: a review of the literature and surgical strategies.

Authors:  Javier Quillo-Olvera; Guang-Xun Lin; Hyun-Jin Jo; Jin-Sung Kim
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

6.  Prepsoas oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion in deformity surgery.

Authors:  Catherine Miller; Puneet Gulati; Deepak Bandlish; Dean Chou; Praveen V Mummaneni
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

7.  Surgical techniques in restoration lumbar lordosis: a biomechanical human cadaveric study.

Authors:  A E A Ochtman; A Bisschop; R L A W Bleys; F C Öner; S M van Gaalen
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-08-11

8.  Does the Access Angle Change the Risk of Approach-Related Complications in Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion? An MRI Study.

Authors:  Chunneng Huang; Zhengkuan Xu; Fangcai Li; Qixin Chen
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2018-06-26

9.  360-Degree Complex Primary Reconstruction Using Porous Tantalum Cages for Adult Degenerative Spinal Deformity.

Authors:  Joseph S Butler; Darren F Lui; Karan Malhotra; Maria L Suarez-Huerta; Haiming Yu; Susanne Selvadurai; Obiekezie Agu; Sean Molloy
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-11-21

10.  Nuances of oblique lumbar interbody fusion at L5-S1: Three case reports.

Authors:  Chirag A Berry
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2021-06-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.