Literature DB >> 27033138

Limiting the Number of Lumens in Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters to Improve Outcomes and Reduce Cost: A Simulation Study.

David Ratz1, Timothy Hofer1, Scott A Flanders2, Sanjay Saint1, Vineet Chopra1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND The number of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) lumens is associated with thrombotic and infectious complications. Because multilumen PICCs are not necessary in all patients, policies that limit their use may improve safety and cost. OBJECTIVE To design a simulation-based analysis to estimate outcomes and cost associated with a policy that encourages single-lumen PICC use. METHODS Model inputs, including risk of complications and costs associated with single- and multilumen PICCs, were obtained from available literature and a multihospital collaborative quality improvement project. Cost savings and reduction in central line-associated bloodstream infection and deep vein thrombosis events from institution of a single-lumen PICC default policy were reported. RESULTS According to our model, a hospital that places 1,000 PICCs per year (25% of which are single-lumen and 75% multilumen) experiences annual PICC-related maintenance and complication costs of $1,228,598 (95% CI, $1,053,175-$1,430,958). In such facilities, every 5% increase in single-lumen PICC use would prevent 0.5 PICC-related central line-associated bloodstream infections and 0.5 PICC-related deep vein thrombosis events, while saving $23,500. Moving from 25% to 50% single-lumen PICC utilization would result in total savings of $119,283 (95% CI, $74,030-$184,170) per year. Regardless of baseline prevalence, a single-lumen default PICC policy would be associated with approximately 10% cost savings. Findings remained robust in multiway sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION Hospital policies that limit the number of PICC lumens may enhance patient safety and reduce healthcare costs. Studies measuring intended and unintended consequences of this approach, followed by rapid adoption, appear necessary. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:811-817.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27033138     DOI: 10.1017/ice.2016.55

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  4 in total

Review 1.  Reducing catheter-related thrombosis using a risk reduction tool centered on catheter to vessel ratio.

Authors:  Timothy R Spencer; Keegan J Mahoney
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Patterns and Predictors of Short-Term Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Use: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  David Paje; Anna Conlon; Scott Kaatz; Lakshmi Swaminathan; Tanya Boldenow; Steven J Bernstein; Scott A Flanders; Vineet Chopra
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.960

3.  Patterns, appropriateness and outcomes of peripherally inserted central catheter use in Brazil: a multicentre study of 12 725 catheters.

Authors:  Eneida Rejane Rabelo-Silva; Solange Antonia Lourenço; Rubia Natasha Maestri; Claudia Candido da Luz; Vanderlei Carlos Pupin; Raquel Bauer Cechinel; Eduarda Bordini Ferro; Marco Aurélio Lumertz Saffi; Telma Christina do Campo Silva; Larissa Martins de Andrade; Larissa Fernanda Sales Gomes; Lorena Alves da Gama; Mariana Marques de Araújo; Fábio Rodrigues Ferreira do Espírito Santo; Leticia López Pedraza; Vânia Naomi Hirakata; Vilma Santana Soares; Widlani Sousa Montenegro; Gustavo Rocha Costa de Freitas; Thaís Souza de Jesus; Vineet Chopra
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 7.418

4.  Association of Infectious Disease Physician Approval of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter With Appropriateness and Complications.

Authors:  Valerie M Vaughn; Megan O'Malley; Scott A Flanders; Tejal N Gandhi; Lindsay A Petty; Anurag N Malani; Allison Weinmann; Jennifer K Horowitz; Vineet Chopra
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-10-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.