Literature DB >> 27032804

Age differences in reactive strategies and execution time during choice stepping with visual interference.

Kazuki Uemura1, Midori Haruta2, Yasushi Uchiyama3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to explore the effects of visual interference from a flanker task on a reactive strategy and execution speed of choice stepping among young and older adults.
METHODS: Twenty-two healthy young (21.9 ± 1.4 years) and 21 older participants (72.6 ± 4.9 years) were instructed to execute forward stepping as quickly and accurately as possible on the side indicated by a central arrow (←left vs. right→) of a visual cue during a neutral condition. During a flanker condition, participants were additionally required to ignore flanker arrows on each side of the central arrow (→→→→→ congruent or incongruent →→←→→). Errors in the direction of the initial weight transfer [anticipatory postural adjustment (APA) errors], step execution time, and divided phases (reaction, APA, and swing phases) were measured from the data of vertical force.
RESULTS: Incongruence had larger effects on step execution times and APA phase in older adults than in young adults, while incongruence had smaller effects on reaction phase in older adults than in young adults. Step execution times were prolonged for trials with APA errors relative to trials without those in both groups. Only older adults showed that step execution times during trials with APA errors increased prominently in the incongruent condition as compared to the other conditions.
CONCLUSION: Older adults might have a tendency to make hastier judgments, and might be vulnerable to potential motor program errors caused by an interference effect. Composite measurement of inhibition and stepping in a functional context may increase discriminative ability for age-related deficits in postural control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Attention; Falls; Inhibition; Postural balance

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 27032804     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-015-3221-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  35 in total

1.  Choice stepping reaction time: a composite measure of falls risk in older people.

Authors:  S R Lord; R C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 2.  A physiological profile approach to falls risk assessment and prevention.

Authors:  Stephen R Lord; Hylton B Menz; Anne Tiedemann
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2003-03

3.  Test-re-test reliability of walking speed, step length and step width measurement after traumatic brain injury: a pilot study.

Authors:  M A van Loo; A M Moseley; J M Bosman; R A de Bie; L Hassett
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Lateralized readiness potentials reveal motor slowing in the aging brain.

Authors:  Alexa B Roggeveen; David J Prime; Lawrence M Ward
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Age and inhibition.

Authors:  L Hasher; E R Stoltzfus; R T Zacks; B Rypma
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  The effects of aging on postural control and selective attention when stepping down while performing a concurrent auditory response task.

Authors:  William W N Tsang; Nazca K Y Lam; Kit N L Lau; Harry C H Leung; Crystal M S Tsang; Xi Lu
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Errors in postural preparation lead to increased choice reaction times for step initiation in older adults.

Authors:  Rajal G Cohen; John G Nutt; Fay B Horak
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 6.053

8.  Reliability and validity of simple photographic plate tests of contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  A L Greeves; B L Cole; R J Jacobs
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1987-11

Review 9.  Gait and cognition: a complementary approach to understanding brain function and the risk of falling.

Authors:  Manuel Montero-Odasso; Joe Verghese; Olivier Beauchet; Jeffrey M Hausdorff
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Choice stepping response and transfer times: effects of age, fall risk, and secondary tasks.

Authors:  Rebecca J St George; Richard C Fitzpatrick; Mark W Rogers; Stephen R Lord
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.053

View more
  2 in total

1.  Auditory stimulus has a larger effect on anticipatory postural adjustments in older than young adults during choice step reaction.

Authors:  Tatsunori Watanabe; Kotaro Saito; Kazuto Ishida; Shigeo Tanabe; Ippei Nojima
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Keeping in step with the young: Chronometric and kinematic data show intact procedural locomotor sequence learning in older adults.

Authors:  Leif Johannsen; Erik Friedgen; Denise Nadine Stephan; Joao Batista; Doreen Schulze; Thea Laurentius; Iring Koch; Leo Cornelius Bollheimer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.