Literature DB >> 27032738

Increasing Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: A Canadian Academic Health Centre Experience.

Jenna Gale1, Chris Cameron2, Innie Chen1, Yanfang Guo2, Sukhbir S Singh1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: An institution wide strategic plan was established to improve minimally invasive surgery (MIS) across all surgical divisions at The Ottawa Hospital (TOH). The primary objective of this study is to determine the change in MIS hysterectomy rate between 2005 and 2012 at this centre. Secondary objectives include determining the impact on overall length of stay (LOS) in hospital, complications, return to hospital, operating room time, and cost.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all hysterectomies for benign disease performed at TOH between 2005 and 2012. Cases were excluded if they were related to pregnancy or classified as "partial hysterectomy." The outcomes and cost of the approaches were compared.
RESULTS: A total of 4337 hysterectomy cases were reviewed. The MIS hysterectomy rate increased from 40.1% in 2005 to 74.2% in 2012. There was a decrease in mean LOS from 2.5 to 1.6 days. This translated to a saving of 1898 inpatient bed days. Compared with laparotomy, laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with a reduced risk of transfusion and a reduced risk of ileus, and vaginal hysterectomy was associated with an increased risk of postoperative abscess. There was no difference in rates of returning to hospital or other complications between women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy and women undergoing MIS hysterectomy (which included both laparoscopic and vaginal approaches). The mean (SD) cost per approach was $7241 ($1985), $4532 ($1718), and $5637 ($1579) for abdominal hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy, and laparoscopic hysterectomy, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The initiatives implemented at TOH in 2007 resulted in a significant increase in the MIS hysterectomy rate, a decrease in mean LOS, and substantial theoretical cost savings for the hospital. Crown
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost analysis; hysterectomy; laparoscopy; length of stay; minimally invasive surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27032738     DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2015.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can        ISSN: 1701-2163


  2 in total

1.  Comparing benign laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy outcomes by time.

Authors:  Samantha L Margulies; Maria V Vargas; Kathryn Denny; Andrew D Sparks; Cherie Q Marfori; Gaby Moawad; Richard L Amdur
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  How to train practising gynaecologists in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: protocol for the stepped-wedge IMAGINE trial.

Authors:  Andreas Obermair; Nigel R Armfield; Nicholas Graves; Val Gebski; George B Hanna; Mark G Coleman; Anne Hughes; Monika Janda
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.