Literature DB >> 27032350

INORGANIC CARBON ACQUISITION BY CHRYSOPHYTES(1).

Stephen C Maberly1, Lucy A Ball1, John A Raven1, Dieter Sültemeyer1.   

Abstract

Twelve species, representing 12 families of the chrysophytes sensu lato, were tested for their ability to take up inorganic carbon. Using the pH-drift technique, CO2 compensation points generally varied between 1 and 20 μmol · L(-1) with a mean concentration of 5 μmol · L(-1) . Neither pH nor alkalinity affected the CO2 compensation point. The concentration of oxygen had a relatively minor effect on CO2 -uptake kinetics, and the mean CO2 compensation point calculated from the kinetic curves was 3.6 μmol · L(-1) at 10-15 kPa starting oxygen partial pressure and 3.8 μmol · L(-1) at atmospheric starting oxygen partial pressure (21 kPa). Similarly, uptake kinetics were not affected by alkalinity, and hence concentration of bicarbonate. Membrane inlet mass spectrometry (MIMS) in the presence and absence of acetazolamide suggested that external carbonic anhydrase in Dinobryon sertularia Ehrenb. and Synura petersenii Korschikov was either very low or absent. Rates of net HCO3 (-) uptake were very low (∼5% of oxygen evolution) using MIMS and decreased rather than increased with increasing HCO3 (-) concentration, suggesting that it was not a real uptake. The CO2 compensation points determined by MIMS for CO2 uptake and oxygen evolution were similar to those determined in pH-drift and were >1 μmol · L(-1) . Overall, the results suggest that chrysophytes as a group lack a carbon-concentrating mechanism (CCM), or an ability to make use of bicarbonate as an alternative source of inorganic carbon. The possible evolutionary and ecological consequences of this are briefly discussed.
© 2009 Phycological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carbon dioxide; carbon-concentrating mechanisms; freshwater algae; pH-drift; photosynthesis; pyrenoids

Year:  2009        PMID: 27032350     DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2009.00734.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phycol        ISSN: 0022-3646            Impact factor:   2.923


  12 in total

1.  Algal competition in a water column with excessive dioxide in the atmosphere.

Authors:  Hua Nie; Sze-Bi Hsu; J P Grover
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 2.  Acquisition and metabolism of carbon in the Ochrophyta other than diatoms.

Authors:  John A Raven; Mario Giordano
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Inorganic carbon acquisition by eukaryotic algae: four current questions.

Authors:  John A Raven
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Evidence for the occurrence of photorespiration in synurophyte algae.

Authors:  Shabana Bhatti; Brian Colman
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2011-03-26       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Carbon limitation of lake productivity.

Authors:  Theis Kragh; Kaj Sand-Jensen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Algal and aquatic plant carbon concentrating mechanisms in relation to environmental change.

Authors:  John A Raven; Mario Giordano; John Beardall; Stephen C Maberly
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 7.  Ecophysiology of photosynthesis in macroalgae.

Authors:  John A Raven; Catriona L Hurd
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Autotrophic and heterotrophic acquisition of carbon and nitrogen by a mixotrophic chrysophyte established through stable isotope analysis.

Authors:  Ramon Terrado; Alexis L Pasulka; Alle A-Y Lie; Victoria J Orphan; Karla B Heidelberg; David A Caron
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 10.302

9.  Cyanobacteria vs green algae: which group has the edge?

Authors:  John Beardall; John A Raven
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 6.992

10.  High planktonic diversity in mountain lakes contains similar contributions of autotrophic, heterotrophic and parasitic eukaryotic life forms.

Authors:  Rüdiger Ortiz-Álvarez; Xavier Triadó-Margarit; Lluís Camarero; Emilio O Casamayor; Jordi Catalan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.