Literature DB >> 27031883

An empirical Kaiser criterion.

Johan Braeken1, Marcel A L M van Assen2.   

Abstract

In exploratory factor analysis (EFA), most popular methods for dimensionality assessment such as the screeplot, the Kaiser criterion, or-the current gold standard-parallel analysis, are based on eigenvalues of the correlation matrix. To further understanding and development of factor retention methods, results on population and sample eigenvalue distributions are introduced based on random matrix theory and Monte Carlo simulations. These results are used to develop a new factor retention method, the Empirical Kaiser Criterion. The performance of the Empirical Kaiser Criterion and parallel analysis is examined in typical research settings, with multiple scales that are desired to be relatively short, but still reliable. Theoretical and simulation results illustrate that the new Empirical Kaiser Criterion performs as well as parallel analysis in typical research settings with uncorrelated scales, but much better when scales are both correlated and short. We conclude that the Empirical Kaiser Criterion is a powerful and promising factor retention method, because it is based on distribution theory of eigenvalues, shows good performance, is easily visualized and computed, and is useful for power analysis and sample size planning for EFA. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27031883     DOI: 10.1037/met0000074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Methods        ISSN: 1082-989X


  36 in total

1.  Development and psychometric properties of the Self-efficacy for Mindfulness Meditation Practice scale.

Authors:  Gurjeet S Birdee; Kenneth A Wallston; Sujata G Ayala; Edward H Ip; Stephanie J Sohl
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2018-06-29

2.  Investigating Parallel Analysis in the Context of Missing Data: A Simulation Study Comparing Six Missing Data Methods.

Authors:  David Goretzko; Christian Heumann; Markus Bühner
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.821

3.  Evaluation of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQL) using item response theory reveals limitations and suggests revisions.

Authors:  Alexander C Peterson; Jason M Sutherland; Guiping Liu; R Trafford Crump; Ahmer A Karimuddin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Revision of the Wisconsin Smoking Withdrawal Scale: Development of brief and long forms.

Authors:  Stevens S Smith; Megan E Piper; Daniel M Bolt; Jesse T Kaye; Michael C Fiore; Timothy B Baker
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2021-03

5.  The development and initial validation of the Breast Cancer Recurrence instrument (BreastCaRe)-a patient-reported outcome measure for detecting symptoms of recurrence after breast cancer.

Authors:  Beverley Lim Høeg; Lena Saltbæk; Karl Bang Christensen; Randi Valbjørn Karlsen; Christoffer Johansen; Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton; Antonia Bennett; Pernille Envold Bidstrup
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Dynamic fit index cutoffs for one-factor models.

Authors:  Daniel McNeish; Melissa G Wolf
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-05-18

7.  Investigating the performance of exploratory graph analysis and traditional techniques to identify the number of latent factors: A simulation and tutorial.

Authors:  Hudson Golino; Dingjing Shi; Alexander P Christensen; Luis Eduardo Garrido; Maria Dolores Nieto; Ritu Sadana; Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan; Agustin Martinez-Molina
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2020-03-19

8.  Psychometric Evaluation of the Short Sensory Profile in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Zachary J Williams; Michelle D Failla; Katherine O Gotham; Tiffany G Woynaroski; Carissa Cascio
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2018-12

9.  The factor structure of depressive symptoms in patients with obesity enrolled in the RAINBOW clinical trial.

Authors:  Marzieh Majd; Joshua M Smyth; Nan Lv; Lan Xiao; Mark B Snowden; Elizabeth M Venditti; Leanne M Williams; Olusola A Ajilore; Trisha Suppes; Jun Ma
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 4.839

10.  Development and Validation of the Parent-Preschoolers Diabetes Adjustment Scale (PP-DAS).

Authors:  Paul T Enlow; Rachel Wasserman; Karen Aroian; Joyce Lee; Tim Wysocki; Jessica Pierce
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2020-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.