Literature DB >> 27031743

The Etiology of Muscle Fatigue Differs between Two Electrical Stimulation Protocols.

Alain Martin1, Sidney Grosprêtre, Christophe Vilmen, Maxime Guye, Jean-Pierre Mattei, Yann LE Fur, David Bendahan, Julien Gondin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed at investigating the mechanisms involved in the force reduction induced by two electrical stimulation (ES) protocols that were designed to activate motor units differently.
METHODS: The triceps surae of 11 healthy subjects (8 men; age, ~28 yr) was activated using ES applied over the tibial nerve. Two ES protocols (conventional [CONV]: 20 Hz, 0.05 ms vs wide-pulse high-frequency [WPHF]: 80 Hz, 1 ms) were performed and involved 40 trains (6 s on-6 s off) delivered at an intensity (IES) evoking 20% of maximal voluntary contraction. To analyze the mechanical properties of the motor units activated at IES, force-frequency relation was evoked before and after each protocol. H-reflex and M-wave responses evoked by the last stimulation pulse were also assessed during each ES protocol. Electromyographic responses (∑EMG) were recorded after each train to analyze the behavior of the motor units activated at IES. Metabolic variables, including relative concentrations of phosphocreatine and inorganic phosphate as well as intracellular pH, were assessed using P-MR spectroscopy during each protocol.
RESULTS: Larger H-reflex amplitudes were observed during WPHF as compared with CONV, whereas opposite findings were observed for M-wave amplitudes. Despite this difference, both the force reduction (-26%) and metabolic changes were similar between the two protocols. The CONV protocol induced a rightward shift of the force-frequency relation, whereas a significant reduction of the ∑EMG evoked at IES was observed only for the WPHF.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that a decreased number of active motor units mainly contributed to WPHF-induced force decrease, whereas intracellular processes were most likely involved in the force reduction occurring during CONV stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27031743     DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  7 in total

1.  Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the psychomotor, cognitive, and motor performances of power athletes.

Authors:  Sidney Grosprêtre; Yohan Grandperrin; Magali Nicolier; Philippe Gimenez; Chrystelle Vidal; Gregory Tio; Emmanuel Haffen; Djamila Bennabi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Specific brain activation patterns associated with two neuromuscular electrical stimulation protocols.

Authors:  Jennifer Wegrzyk; Jean-Philippe Ranjeva; Alexandre Fouré; Anne Kavounoudias; Christophe Vilmen; Jean-Pierre Mattei; Maxime Guye; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Nicolas Place; David Bendahan; Julien Gondin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Novel perspective on contractile properties and intensity-dependent verification of force-frequency relationship during neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Aya Tomita; Shuhei Kawade; Toshio Moritani; Kohei Watanabe
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2020-11

4.  Effects of three neuromuscular electrical stimulation methods on muscle force production and neuromuscular fatigue.

Authors:  Sami K Alahmari; Anthony J Shield; Gabriel S Trajano
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.645

5.  Wide-Pulse High-Frequency Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Evokes Greater Relative Force in Women Than in Men: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Xin Ye; Nathan Gockel; Daniel Vala; Teagan Devoe; Patrick Brodoff; Victor Gaza; Vinz Umali; Hayden Walker
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-05

6.  Effects of Very High Stimulation Frequency and Wide-Pulse Duration on Stimulated Force and Fatigue of Quadriceps in Healthy Participants.

Authors:  Kitima Rongsawad; Jonjin Ratanapinunchai
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2018-04-30

7.  Modulation of spinal excitability following neuromuscular electrical stimulation superimposed to voluntary contraction.

Authors:  Riccardo Borzuola; Luciana Labanca; Andrea Macaluso; Luca Laudani
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 3.078

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.