Literature DB >> 27031574

Comparison of screening questionnaires to identify psoriatic arthritis in a primary-care population: a cross-sectional study.

L C Coates1,2, L Savage1,2, R Waxman1, A R Moverley1,2, S Worthington1,2, P S Helliwell3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many questionnaires are available for assessment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), but there is little evidence comparing them.
OBJECTIVES: To test the proposed CONTEST questionnaire, which was developed to identify patients with psoriasis who have undiagnosed PsA, and compare it with the validated Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST) questionnaire in a primary-care setting.
METHODS: A random sample of adult patients with psoriasis and no diagnosis of arthritis was identified from five general practice surgeries in Yorkshire, U.K. Consenting patients completed both questionnaires and were assessed by a dermatologist and rheumatologist. Diagnosis of PsA was made by the assessing rheumatologist. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis examined the sensitivity and specificity of potential cut points.
RESULTS: In total 932 packs were sent to recruit 191 (20·5%) participants. Of these, 169 (88·5%) were confirmed to have current or previous psoriasis. Using physician diagnosis 17 (10·1%) were found to have previously undiagnosed PsA, while 90 (53·3%) had another musculoskeletal complaint and 62 (36·7%) had no musculoskeletal problems. Using ROC curve analysis, all of the questionnaires showed a significant ability to identify PsA. The area under the curve (AUC) for the CONTEST questionnaires was slightly higher than that of PEST (0·69 and 0·70 vs. 0·65), but there was no significant difference identified. Examining the sensitivities and specificities for the different cut points suggested that a PEST score ≥ 2 would perform better in this dataset, and the optimal scores for CONTEST and CONTEST plus joint manikin were 3 and 4, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of the questionnaires to identify PsA appeared similar, with a slightly higher AUC for the CONTEST questionnaires. The optimal cut points in this study appeared lower than in previous studies.
© 2016 British Association of Dermatologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27031574     DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  10 in total

Review 1.  Psoriatic arthritis: state of the art review.

Authors:  Laura C Coates; Philip S Helliwell
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 2.  Brazilian Society of Rheumatology 2020 guidelines for psoriatic arthritis.

Authors:  Sueli Carneiro; Penelope Esther Palominos; Sônia Maria Alvarenga Anti; Rodrigo Luppino Assad; Rafaela Silva Guimarães Gonçalves; Adriano Chiereghin; Andre Marun Lyrio; Antônio Carlos Ximenes; Carla Gonçalves Saad; Célio Roberto Gonçalves; Charles Lubianca Kohem; Cláudia Diniz Lopes Marques; Cláudia Goldenstein Schainberg; Eduardo de Souza Meirelles; Gustavo Gomes Resende; Lenise Brandao Pieruccetti; Mauro Waldemar Keiserman; Michel Alexandre Yazbek; Percival Degrava Sampaio-Barros; Ricardo da Cruz Lage; Rubens Bonfiglioli; Thauana Luíza Oliveira; Valderílio Feijó Azevedo; Washington Alves Bianchi; Wanderley Marques Bernardo; Ricardo Dos Santos Simões; Marcelo de Medeiros Pinheiro; Cristiano Barbosa Campanholo
Journal:  Adv Rheumatol       Date:  2021-11-24

3.  Psoriatic arthritis screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicolas Iragorri; Glen Hazlewood; Braden Manns; Vishva Danthurebandara; Eldon Spackman
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 7.580

4.  Erectile Dysfunction in Men With Psoriatic Arthritis: A Population-based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Katelynn M Wilton; Sara J Achenbach; Paras Karmacharya; Floranne C Ernste; Eric L Matteson; Cynthia S Crowson
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 5.346

5.  Rate of Proven Rheumatic Diseases in a Large Collective of Referrals to an Outpatient Rheumatology Clinic Under Routine Conditions.

Authors:  Martin Feuchtenberger; Axel Philipp Nigg; Michael Rupert Kraus; Arne Schäfer
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-10-02

Review 6.  Diagnosis and Intervention in Early Psoriatic Arthritis.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Hioki; Mayumi Komine; Mamitaro Ohtsuki
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Evaluation of a Genetic Risk Score for Diagnosis of Psoriatic Arthritis.

Authors:  Mary Patricia Smith; Karen Ly; Quinn Thibodeaux; Kristen Beck; Eric Yang; Isabelle Sanchez; Joanne Nititham; Tina Bhutani; Wilson Liao
Journal:  J Psoriasis Psoriatic Arthritis       Date:  2020-03-04

8.  Health professional views on the assessment and management of foot problems in people with psoriatic arthritis in Australia and New Zealand: a qualitative investigation.

Authors:  Kate Carter; Steven Walmsley; Keith Rome; Deborah E Turner
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  A novel biomarker of MMP-cleaved prolargin is elevated in patients with psoriatic arthritis.

Authors:  Dovile Sinkeviciute; Solveig Skovlund Groen; Shu Sun; Tina Manon-Jensen; Anders Aspberg; Patrik Önnerfjord; Anne-Christine Bay-Jensen; Salome Kristensen; Signe Holm Nielsen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Musculoskeletal Imaging for Dermatologists: Techniques in the Diagnosis and Management of Psoriatic Arthritis.

Authors:  Alice B Gottlieb; Catherine Bakewell; Joseph F Merola
Journal:  Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)       Date:  2021-06-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.