Literature DB >> 27031562

CHARMM TIP3P Water Model Suppresses Peptide Folding by Solvating the Unfolded State.

Sander Boonstra1, Patrick R Onck1, Erik van der Giessen1.   

Abstract

The accuracy of molecular dynamics simulations depends on the underlying force field, defined by the form and parametrization of the interparticle potential functions and the water model. The treatment of the solvent is crucial in molecular dynamics force fields, as hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonding are important molecular forces. The widely used CHARMM force field was originally parametrized using a modified version of the TIP3P water model (mTIP3P), including Lennard-Jones interactions between hydrogens and oxygens. The latest version, CHARMM36, was optimized using the standard TIP3P water model (sTIP3P) for proteins, while mTIP3P is still being used for lipids. Our replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations on dynamic peptides show that the CHARMM36 force field with mTIP3P water yields less realistic folding than with sTIP3P water. Analysis of the dimensions and hydrogen bonding of the unfolded state reveals that the peptides are more solvated and extended in mTIP3P, due to a higher solvation energy of the peptide in this water model. We recommend using CHARMM36 with sTIP3P when simulating peptides, folded proteins, and natively unfolded proteins, but combinations of proteins with lipids would require a reparametrization to make their water models compatible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27031562     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b01316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  32 in total

Review 1.  Force field development and simulations of intrinsically disordered proteins.

Authors:  Jing Huang; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2017-11-05       Impact factor: 6.809

2.  Integrating solvation shell structure in experimentally driven molecular dynamics using x-ray solution scattering data.

Authors:  Darren J Hsu; Denis Leshchev; Irina Kosheleva; Kevin L Kohlstedt; Lin X Chen
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  CHARMM36m: an improved force field for folded and intrinsically disordered proteins.

Authors:  Jing Huang; Sarah Rauscher; Grzegorz Nawrocki; Ting Ran; Michael Feig; Bert L de Groot; Helmut Grubmüller; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Computational IR Spectroscopy of Insulin Dimer Structure and Conformational Heterogeneity.

Authors:  Chi-Jui Feng; Anton Sinitskiy; Vijay Pande; Andrei Tokmakoff
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  TNFRSF13B c.226G>A (p.Gly76Ser) as a Novel Causative Mutation for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Authors:  Yoshiki Shinya; Takahiro Hiraide; Mizuki Momoi; Shinichi Goto; Hisato Suzuki; Yoshinori Katsumata; Yutaka Kurebayashi; Jin Endo; Motoaki Sano; Keiichi Fukuda; Kenjiro Kosaki; Masaharu Kataoka
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  Is the Conformational Ensemble of Alzheimer's Aβ10-40 Peptide Force Field Dependent?

Authors:  Christopher M Siwy; Christopher Lockhart; Dmitri K Klimov
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Localization and Ordering of Lipids Around Aquaporin-0: Protein and Lipid Mobility Effects.

Authors:  Rodolfo Briones; Camilo Aponte-Santamaría; Bert L de Groot
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Unfolding bovine α-lactalbumin with T-jump: Characterizing disordered intermediates via time-resolved x-ray solution scattering and molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Darren J Hsu; Denis Leshchev; Irina Kosheleva; Kevin L Kohlstedt; Lin X Chen
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2021-03-14       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Effects of forcefield and sampling method in all-atom simulations of inherently disordered proteins: Application to conformational preferences of human amylin.

Authors:  Enxi Peng; Nevena Todorova; Irene Yarovsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Arginase Structure and Inhibition: Catalytic Site Plasticity Reveals New Modulation Possibilities.

Authors:  Jérémie Mortier; Julien R C Prévost; Dominique Sydow; Sabine Teuchert; Christian Omieczynski; Marcel Bermudez; Raphaël Frédérick; Gerhard Wolber
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.