Literature DB >> 27030939

Use of Biomarkers.

L Rodríguez-Mañas1.   

Abstract

Expanding the concept of frailty to the clinical settings has raised the concern about the accuracy of the current definitions for identifying frail individuals (not populations). The usual tools to assess frailty show, among other characteristics, a low sensitivity and a low Positive Predictive Value. One approach to overcome this challenge is using biological biomarkers to improve those characteristics, making feasible and accurate the assessment of frailty in clinical settings. Many biomarkers of frailty have been identified but few of them have been assessed as clinical markers with controversial results. Taking into account that frailty is caused by the failure in different systems, it is worthy to check if the combination of several of these biomarkers could be of help. In this effort, the EU-funded project FRAILOMIC is trying to assess the ability of different sets of biomarkers for improving the accuracy of classical definitions in determining the risk, the diagnosis and the prognosis of frailty.

Year:  2015        PMID: 27030939     DOI: 10.14283/jfa.2015.46

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Frailty Aging        ISSN: 2260-1341


  2 in total

Review 1.  Relevance of oxidative stress and inflammation in frailty based on human studies and mouse models.

Authors:  María Álvarez-Satta; Alejandro Berna-Erro; Estefania Carrasco-Garcia; Ainhoa Alberro; Ander Saenz-Antoñanzas; Itziar Vergara; David Otaegui; Ander Matheu
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 5.682

2.  Identifying Biomarkers for Biological Age: Geroscience and the ICFSR Task Force.

Authors:  N K LeBrasseur; R de Cabo; R Fielding; L Ferrucci; L Rodriguez-Manas; J Viña; B Vellas
Journal:  J Frailty Aging       Date:  2021
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.