Literature DB >> 27030582

A Multilaboratory Toxicological Assessment of a Panel of 10 Engineered Nanomaterials to Human Health--ENPRA Project--The Highlights, Limitations, and Current and Future Challenges.

Ali Kermanizadeh1,2, Ilse Gosens3, Laura MacCalman4, Helinor Johnston2, Pernille H Danielsen1, Nicklas R Jacobsen5, Anke-Gabriele Lenz6, Teresa Fernandes2, Roel P F Schins7, Flemming R Cassee3, Håkan Wallin1,5, Wolfgang Kreyling8, Tobias Stoeger6, Steffen Loft1, Peter Møller1, Lang Tran4, Vicki Stone2.   

Abstract

ENPRA was one of the earlier multidisciplinary European Commission FP7-funded projects aiming to evaluate the risks associated with nanomaterial (NM) exposure on human health across pulmonary, cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, and developmental systems. The outputs from this project have formed the basis of this review. A retrospective interpretation of the findings across a wide range of in vitro and in vivo studies was performed to identify the main highlights from the project. In particular, focus was placed on informing what advances were made in the hazard assessment of NM, as well as offering some suggestions on the future of "nanotoxicology research" based on these observations, shortcomings, and lessons learned from the project. A number of issues related to the hazard assessment of NM are discussed in detail and include use of appropriate NM for nanotoxicology investigations; characterization and dispersion of NM; use of appropriate doses for all related investigations; need for the correct choice of experimental models for risk assessment purposes; and full understanding of the test systems and correct interpretation of data generated from in vitro and in vivo systems. It is hoped that this review may assist in providing information in the implementation of guidelines, model systems, validation of assessment methodology, and integrated testing approaches for risk assessment of NM. It is vital to learn from ongoing and/or completed studies to avoid unnecessary duplication and offer suggestions that might improve different aspects of experimental design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27030582     DOI: 10.1080/10937404.2015.1126210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev        ISSN: 1093-7404            Impact factor:   6.393


  17 in total

Review 1.  Engineered nanomaterial-induced lysosomal membrane permeabilization and anti-cathepsin agents.

Authors:  Melisa Bunderson-Schelvan; Andrij Holian; Raymond F Hamilton
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 6.393

2.  Nanoparticles-induced apoptosis of human airway epithelium is mediated by proNGF/p75NTR signaling.

Authors:  Sreeparna Chakraborty; Vincent Castranova; Miriam K Perez; Giovanni Piedimonte
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2017

3.  Effects of pulmonary exposure to chemically-distinct welding fumes on neuroendocrine markers of toxicity.

Authors:  K Krajnak; K Sriram; C Johnson; J R Roberts; R Mercer; G R Miller; O Wirth; J M Antonini
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2017-06-09

4.  Pulmonary exposure to cellulose nanocrystals caused deleterious effects to reproductive system in male mice.

Authors:  Mariana T Farcas; Elena R Kisin; Autumn L Menas; Dmitriy W Gutkin; Alexander Star; Richard S Reiner; Naveena Yanamala; Kai Savolainen; Anna A Shvedova
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2016-08-24

5.  Drosophila as a Suitable In Vivo Model in the Safety Assessment of Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Eşref Demir; Fatma Turna Demir; Ricard Marcos
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  Comparison of silver nanoparticle-induced inflammatory responses between healthy and metabolic syndrome mouse models.

Authors:  Lisa Kobos; Saeed Alqahtani; Li Xia; Vincent Coltellino; Riley Kishman; Daniel McIlrath; Carlos Perez-Torres; Jonathan Shannahan
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2020-04-12

7.  Differences in MWCNT- and SWCNT-induced DNA methylation alterations in association with the nuclear deposition.

Authors:  Deniz Öner; Manosij Ghosh; Hannelore Bové; Matthieu Moisse; Bram Boeckx; Radu C Duca; Katrien Poels; Katrien Luyts; Eveline Putzeys; Kirsten Van Landuydt; Jeroen Aj Vanoirbeek; Marcel Ameloot; Diether Lambrechts; Lode Godderis; Peter Hm Hoet
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 9.400

8.  Surface modification does not influence the genotoxic and inflammatory effects of TiO2 nanoparticles after pulmonary exposure by instillation in mice.

Authors:  Håkan Wallin; Zdenka O Kyjovska; Sarah S Poulsen; Nicklas R Jacobsen; Anne T Saber; Stefan Bengtson; Petra Jackson; Ulla Vogel
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 9.  Hazard and risk assessment strategies for nanoparticle exposures: how far have we come in the past 10 years?

Authors:  David B Warheit
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-03-26

10.  Vasomotor function in rat arteries after ex vivo and intragastric exposure to food-grade titanium dioxide and vegetable carbon particles.

Authors:  Ditte Marie Jensen; Daniel Vest Christophersen; Majid Sheykhzade; Gry Freja Skovsted; Jens Lykkesfeldt; Rasmus Münter; Martin Roursgaard; Steffen Loft; Peter Møller
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 9.400

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.