Literature DB >> 27029805

Concordance between core needle biopsy and surgical specimen for oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status in breast cancer.

Aravind Barathi Asogan1, Ga Sze Hong2, Subash Kumar Arni Prabhakaran1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to analyse the concordance rate, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value of core needle biopsy (CNB) and subsequent surgical specimen (SS) in assessing levels of oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu). It also evaluated the revised American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines for ER/PgR positivity.
METHODS: We analysed the breast cancer database of KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, from 1 June 2005 to 30 December 2012. Invasive breast cancer patients who had CNB and subsequent SS were included.
RESULTS: A total of 560 patients were included. The concordance of ER, PgR and HER2/neu positivity between CNB and SS was 96.1%, 89.1% and 96.8%, respectively. When the 'ER ≥ 10% positive' group was compared with the 'ER ≥ 1% positive' group, specificity increased from 79.7% to 92.5% and PPV increased from 93.9% to 97.5%. When the 'PgR ≥ 10% positive' group was compared with the 'PgR ≥ 1% positive' group, specificity increased from 84.2% to 89.3% and PPV improved from 89.7% to 92.9%. The revised ASCO/CAP guidelines decreased discordant results by > 50% for ER and by 18.2% for PgR.
CONCLUSION: CNB has high concordance with SS in the evaluation of the molecular profile of invasive breast cancer. Thus, molecular evaluation does not need to be repeated with SS except for ER-, PgR- and HER2/neu-negative CNB results. The revised ASCO/CAP guidelines resulted in more precise ER and PgR status on CNB. Copyright: © Singapore Medical Association

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASCO/CAP guidelines; accuracy of core needle biopsy; biological profile ER PgR HER2/neu; breast carcinoma; concordance between core needle biopsy and surgical specimen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27029805      PMCID: PMC5360870          DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2016062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Singapore Med J        ISSN: 0037-5675            Impact factor:   1.858


  22 in total

Review 1.  Estrogen receptor analysis for breast cancer: current issues and keys to increasing testing accuracy.

Authors:  Leslie K Diaz; Nour Sneige
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.875

2.  Immunohistochemical determination of HER2 expression in breast cancer from core biopsy specimens: a reliable predictor of HER2 status of the whole tumor.

Authors:  E Mueller-Holzner; V Fink; T Frede; C Marth
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Comparison of core oestrogen receptor (ER) assay with excised tumour: intratumoral distribution of ER in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  A G Douglas-Jones; N Collett; J M Morgan; B Jasani
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene.

Authors:  D J Slamon; G M Clark; S G Wong; W J Levin; A Ullrich; W L McGuire
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-01-09       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Can core biopsy be used instead of surgical biopsy in the diagnosis and prognostic factor analysis of breast carcinoma?

Authors:  Aysegul Ozdemir; Nuray Kadioglu Voyvoda; Serap Gultekin; Isil Tuncbilek; Ayse Dursun; Deniz Yamac
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Loss of antigenicity in stored sections of breast cancer tissue microarrays.

Authors:  Jennifer H Fergenbaum; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Stephen M Hewitt; Jolanta Lissowska; Lori C Sakoda; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 7.  Stable 'portrait' of breast tumors during progression: data from biology, pathology and genetics.

Authors:  M Lacroix; R-A Toillon; G Leclercq
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.678

8.  Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing.

Authors:  Marco Gerlinger; Andrew J Rowan; Stuart Horswell; James Larkin; David Endesfelder; Eva Gronroos; Pierre Martinez; Nicholas Matthews; Aengus Stewart; Charles Swanton; M Math; Patrick Tarpey; Ignacio Varela; Benjamin Phillimore; Sharmin Begum; Neil Q McDonald; Adam Butler; David Jones; Keiran Raine; Calli Latimer; Claudio R Santos; Mahrokh Nohadani; Aron C Eklund; Bradley Spencer-Dene; Graham Clark; Lisa Pickering; Gordon Stamp; Martin Gore; Zoltan Szallasi; Julian Downward; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2011, Featuring Incidence of Breast Cancer Subtypes by Race/Ethnicity, Poverty, and State.

Authors:  Betsy A Kohler; Recinda L Sherman; Nadia Howlader; Ahmedin Jemal; A Blythe Ryerson; Kevin A Henry; Francis P Boscoe; Kathleen A Cronin; Andrew Lake; Anne-Michelle Noone; S Jane Henley; Christie R Eheman; Robert N Anderson; Lynne Penberthy
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Discordance between core needle biopsy (CNB) and excisional biopsy (EB) for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and HER2 status in early breast cancer (EBC).

Authors:  M Arnedos; A Nerurkar; P Osin; R A'Hern; I E Smith; M Dowsett
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  2 in total

1.  Impact of chemotherapy on the expression of claudins and cadherins in invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Helena Skálová; Nikola Hájková; Barbora Majerová; Michaela Bártů; Ctibor Povýšil; Ivana Tichá
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  The appropriate number of preoperative core needle biopsy specimens for analysis in breast cancer.

Authors:  Tao Sun; Hanwen Zhang; Wei Gao; Qifeng Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.