W Jacot1, N Firmin2, L Roca3, D Topart4, S Gallet2, A Durigova2, S Mirr2, L Abach3, S Pouderoux2, V D'Hondt2, J P Bleuse3, P J Lamy5, G Romieu2. 1. Department of Medical Oncology William.Jacot@icm.unicancer.fr. 2. Department of Medical Oncology. 3. Biometrics Unit, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier. 4. Department of Medical Oncology, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier. 5. Specialized Biology and Oncogenetics Laboratory, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:A minority of early breast cancer (EBC) patients treated withadjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy have sufficient baseline vitamin D (vitD) level. This randomized phase III study assessed the safety and efficacy of a tailored, high-dose, oral vitD supplementation in restoring a normal 25-hydroxy vitD (25OHD) level in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants received a 6-month conventional (C) vitD and calcium supplementation or a 6-month high-dose oral vitD regimen tailored on the deficiency (T) and a conventional calcium supplementation. The primary end point was the 6-month percentage of 25OHD serum level normalization. RESULTS: A total of 215 patients including 197 patients with vitD deficiency were recruited, and 195 patients were randomized (T, 100; C, 95). Compliance to the daily oral supplementation was 68.4% and 67% in the C and T arms, respectively. Discontinuous high-dose vitD compliance appeared higher in the T arm (77%). At 6 months, more patients presented with a normalized vitD level in the T arm (30% versus 12.6%; P = 0.003). Supplementation was well tolerated, and no significant difference in the treatment-related toxicity between the two arms was reported. Fifty-two patients without vitD normalization from the C arm switched to the T arm after 6 months. At 12 months, 44% of these patients achieved vitD normalization. CONCLUSION: A tailored high-dose oral vitD supplementation safely allows a higher percentage of the serum 25OHD level normalization compared with a conventional regimen in chemotherapy-treated EBC patients. As compliance to a daily oral supplementation remains poor in this setting, an adaptation of the treatment schedule is warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT01480869.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: A minority of early breast cancer (EBC) patients treated with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy have sufficient baseline vitamin D (vitD) level. This randomized phase III study assessed the safety and efficacy of a tailored, high-dose, oral vitD supplementation in restoring a normal 25-hydroxy vitD (25OHD) level in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants received a 6-month conventional (C) vitD and calcium supplementation or a 6-month high-dose oral vitD regimen tailored on the deficiency (T) and a conventional calcium supplementation. The primary end point was the 6-month percentage of 25OHD serum level normalization. RESULTS: A total of 215 patients including 197 patients with vitD deficiency were recruited, and 195 patients were randomized (T, 100; C, 95). Compliance to the daily oral supplementation was 68.4% and 67% in the C and T arms, respectively. Discontinuous high-dose vitD compliance appeared higher in the T arm (77%). At 6 months, more patients presented with a normalized vitD level in the T arm (30% versus 12.6%; P = 0.003). Supplementation was well tolerated, and no significant difference in the treatment-related toxicity between the two arms was reported. Fifty-two patients without vitD normalization from the C arm switched to the T arm after 6 months. At 12 months, 44% of these patients achieved vitD normalization. CONCLUSION: A tailored high-dose oral vitD supplementation safely allows a higher percentage of the serum 25OHD level normalization compared with a conventional regimen in chemotherapy-treated EBC patients. As compliance to a daily oral supplementation remains poor in this setting, an adaptation of the treatment schedule is warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT01480869.
Authors: Akiko Chiba; Rachna Raman; Alexandra Thomas; Pierre-Jean Lamy; Marie Viala; Stephane Pouderoux; Sarah L Mott; Mary C Schroeder; Simon Thezenas; William Jacot Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2017-12-11 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Marissa B Savoie; Alan Paciorek; Li Zhang; Erin L Van Blarigan; Nilli Sommovilla; Donald Abrams; Chloe E Atreya; Emily K Bergsland; Hueylan Chern; Robin K Kelley; Andrew Ko; Angela Laffan; Ankit Sarin; Madhulika G Varma; Alan P Venook; Katherine Van Loon Journal: J Gastrointest Cancer Date: 2019-12
Authors: J G Sfeir; M T Drake; B R LaPlant; M J Maurer; B K Link; T J Berndt; T D Shanafelt; J R Cerhan; T M Habermann; A L Feldman; T Witzig Journal: Blood Cancer J Date: 2017-02-03 Impact factor: 11.037
Authors: Marie Viala; Akiko Chiba; Simon Thezenas; Laure Delmond; Pierre-Jean Lamy; Sarah L Mott; Mary C Schroeder; Alexandra Thomas; William Jacot Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-07-30 Impact factor: 4.430