Timothy P Pearman1,2,3, Jennifer L Beaumont4, David Cella4,5, Maureen P Neary6, James Yao7. 1. Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. t-pearman@northwestern.edu. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. t-pearman@northwestern.edu. 3. Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. t-pearman@northwestern.edu. 4. Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. 5. Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. 6. Department of Worldwide Health Outcomes, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA. 7. Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are malignant solid tumors arising in hormone-secreting tissue. They have historically been very difficult to treat, and advanced NETs are considered incurable. Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment option, though research is ongoing, investigating the efficacy of targeted therapies combined with more traditional chemotherapies. Frequent bowel movements and episodes of flushing are the most common symptoms. METHODS: The present study reports data from an anonymous patient survey of 663 eligible NET patients, identified with the assistance of patient advocacy groups. This study investigated the impact of treatment (surgery alone; surgery plus somatostatin analogue; other treatments) on quality of life (QOL). Finally, we investigate whether recurrent disease results in poorer QOL compared to disease treated curatively with surgery and remaining in remission. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Results suggest that increased frequency of bowel movements and presence of any flushing symptoms are correlated with decreased quality of life. Treatment groups differed on most Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) global health and PROMIS-29 scores, including physical function, fatigue, pain, social function, and general physical and mental health, with the surgery group reporting significantly better scores than the other groups (effect size of differences ranged from 0.28 to 0.54). This may be possibly due to effective symptom control reached for these patients through surgery alone. After adjustment for carcinoid syndrome, the association with the treatment group disappeared for all domains except physical functioning. In terms of disease status, patients with recurrent disease reported poorer physical, social, and mental functions. Depression scores were similar between groups; however, patients with recurrent disease reported significantly higher anxiety compared to those with no current NET. Physical functioning was even more markedly different between groups, with recurrent NET patients reporting significantly impaired overall physical function, impaired sleep, and significant fatigue compared to those with no current NET. To our knowledge, this is the first study to comprehensively examine the effect of treatment group, disease status, and symptom burden on the quality of life in NET patients in a large sample. Limitations and future research directions are discussed.
INTRODUCTION:Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are malignant solid tumors arising in hormone-secreting tissue. They have historically been very difficult to treat, and advanced NETs are considered incurable. Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment option, though research is ongoing, investigating the efficacy of targeted therapies combined with more traditional chemotherapies. Frequent bowel movements and episodes of flushing are the most common symptoms. METHODS: The present study reports data from an anonymous patient survey of 663 eligible NET patients, identified with the assistance of patient advocacy groups. This study investigated the impact of treatment (surgery alone; surgery plus somatostatin analogue; other treatments) on quality of life (QOL). Finally, we investigate whether recurrent disease results in poorer QOL compared to disease treated curatively with surgery and remaining in remission. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Results suggest that increased frequency of bowel movements and presence of any flushing symptoms are correlated with decreased quality of life. Treatment groups differed on most Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) global health and PROMIS-29 scores, including physical function, fatigue, pain, social function, and general physical and mental health, with the surgery group reporting significantly better scores than the other groups (effect size of differences ranged from 0.28 to 0.54). This may be possibly due to effective symptom control reached for these patients through surgery alone. After adjustment for carcinoid syndrome, the association with the treatment group disappeared for all domains except physical functioning. In terms of disease status, patients with recurrent disease reported poorer physical, social, and mental functions. Depression scores were similar between groups; however, patients with recurrent disease reported significantly higher anxiety compared to those with no current NET. Physical functioning was even more markedly different between groups, with recurrent NET patients reporting significantly impaired overall physical function, impaired sleep, and significant fatigue compared to those with no current NET. To our knowledge, this is the first study to comprehensively examine the effect of treatment group, disease status, and symptom burden on the quality of life in NET patients in a large sample. Limitations and future research directions are discussed.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bowel movement; Health-related quality of life; Neuroendocrine tumor
Authors: A H G Davies; G Larsson; J Ardill; E Friend; L Jones; M Falconi; R Bettini; M Koller; O Sezer; C Fleissner; B Taal; J M Blazeby; J K Ramage Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2006-01-18 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Emmanuel Mitry; Thomas Walter; Eric Baudin; Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz; Philippe Ruszniewski; Sophie Dominguez-Tinajero; Leïla Bengrine-Lefevre; Guillaume Cadiot; Clarisse Dromain; Françoise Farace; Philippe Rougier; Michel Ducreux Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2014-10-18 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: James C Yao; Manal Hassan; Alexandria Phan; Cecile Dagohoy; Colleen Leary; Jeannette E Mares; Eddie K Abdalla; Jason B Fleming; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Asif Rashid; Douglas B Evans Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: D F Cella; D S Tulsky; G Gray; B Sarafian; E Linn; A Bonomi; M Silberman; S B Yellen; P Winicour; J Brannon Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1993-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Felix Fischer; Chris Gibbons; Joël Coste; Jose M Valderas; Matthias Rose; Alain Leplège Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Daniel M Halperin; Chan Shen; Arvind Dasari; Ying Xu; Yiyi Chu; Shouhao Zhou; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; James C Yao Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2017-02-24 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Rosaria M Ruggeri; Barbara Altieri; Erika Grossrubatcher; Roberto Minotta; Maria Grazia Tarsitano; Virginia Zamponi; Andrea MIsidori; Antongiulio Faggiano; Anna Maria Colao Journal: Rev Endocr Metab Disord Date: 2022-03-16 Impact factor: 6.514
Authors: Adam J Rose; Elizabeth Bayliss; Wenjing Huang; Lesley Baseman; Emily Butcher; Rosa-Elena García; Maria Orlando Edelen Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Caroline Martini; Eva-Maria Gamper; Lisa Wintner; Bernhard Nilica; Barbara Sperner-Unterweger; Bernhard Holzner; Irene Virgolini Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2016-09-10 Impact factor: 3.186