| Literature DB >> 27029046 |
Kate E Callister1, Peter A Griffioen2, Sarah C Avitabile1, Angie Haslem1, Luke T Kelly3, Sally A Kenny1, Dale G Nimmo3, Lisa M Farnsworth1, Rick S Taylor1, Simon J Watson1, Andrew F Bennett3, Michael F Clarke1.
Abstract
Understanding the age structure of vegetation is important for effective land management, especially in fire-prone landscapes where the effects of fire can persist for decades and centuries. In many parts of the world, such information is limited due to an inability to map disturbance histories before the availability of satellite images (~1972). Here, we describe a method for creating a spatial model of the age structure of canopy species that established pre-1972. We built predictive neural network models based on remotely sensed data and ecological field survey data. These models determined the relationship between sites of known fire age and remotely sensed data. The predictive model was applied across a 104,000 km(2) study region in semi-arid Australia to create a spatial model of vegetation age structure, which is primarily the result of stand-replacing fires which occurred before 1972. An assessment of the predictive capacity of the model using independent validation data showed a significant correlation (rs = 0.64) between predicted and known age at test sites. Application of the model provides valuable insights into the distribution of vegetation age-classes and fire history in the study region. This is a relatively straightforward method which uses widely available data sources that can be applied in other regions to predict age-class distribution beyond the limits imposed by satellite imagery.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27029046 PMCID: PMC4814043 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150808
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1False colour composite Landsat MSS image from near-infrared (0.8–1.1 μm) bands of three images (1977, 1980 and 1985), highlighting fires in the Murray-Sunset National Park between 1977 to 1980 (red) and 1980 to 1985 (yellow).
Older fire scars are also apparent in shades of blue, grey and green.
The final set of input spatial layers selected for a neural network model to predict fire age, and the sensitivity of each variable.
| Variable | Sensitivity |
|---|---|
| Mallee vegetation (3 classes) | 1.72 |
| 1985 Band 3 Visible (0.63–0.69 μm) | 1.12 |
| 1985 Band 4 Near-Infrared (0.76–0.90 μm) | 1.07 |
| 2005 Band 5 Near-Infrared (1.55–1.75 μm) | 1.05 |
| 2005 Band 1 Visible (0.45–0.52 μm) | 1.05 |
| 2007 Band 3 Visible (0.63–0.69 μm) | 1.04 |
| 2005 Band 2 Visible (0.52–0.60 μm) | 1.04 |
| 2007 Band 5 Near-Infrared (1.55–1.75 μm) | 1.03 |
| 2005 Band 7 Mid-Infrared (2.08–2.35 μm) | 1.03 |
| 2007 Band 6 Thermal (10.40–12.50 μm) | 1.01 |
| 2007 Band 7 Mid-Infrared (2.08–2.35 μm) | 1.01 |
| 2007 Band 2 Visible (0.52–0.60 μm) | 0.99 |
| 2007 Band 1 Visible (0.45–0.52 μm) | 0.99 |
Number of sites from each decade selected for model training, testing and validation.
| Decade | Train | Test | Validation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970–77 | 146 | 47 | 47 |
| 1960–69 | 35 | 16 | 15 |
| 1950–59 | 50 | 19 | 15 |
| 1940–49 | 34 | 12 | 9 |
| 1930–39 | 42 | 9 | 12 |
| 1920–29 | 14 | 9 | 7 |
| 1910–19 | 39 | 10 | 10 |
| 1900–09 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| 1800s | 9 | 2 | 4 |
| 374 | 124 | 124 |
Fig 2Relationship between the vegetation age at sites as determined from field data or of known age (x axis, predicted from stem diameter model [72 sites] and points of known fire history [52 sites]) and as predicted from remotely sensed data by using an ANN model.
The mean is shown in bold, with 95% prediction errors. Also shown is the line of a 1:1 relationship.
Fig 3Map of the distribution of age-classes (attributed to fire) of mallee vegetation in the Murray Mallee region as predicted from the artificial neural network model.
Fig 4Zoomed in section of the map of the distribution of vegetation age-classes as predicted from the neural network model.
This area in north-west Victoria shows the age classes of mallee vegetation along roadsides, and the east-west, dune-swale system.
Fig 5Age-class distribution of mallee stems comparing known fire history based on a) light shading—satellite imagery since 1972 (with all mallee vegetation greater than 1972 grouped together as ‘old’); and b) solid shading—a combination of mapping from 1972–2011 plus modelling of stem age from 1975 to pre-1900.