Literature DB >> 27028661

Increased distractibility in schizotypy: Independent of individual differences in working memory capacity?

John E Marsh1,2, François Vachon3, Patrik Sörqvist2.   

Abstract

Individuals with schizophrenia typically show increased levels of distractibility. This has been attributed to impaired working memory capacity (WMC), since lower WMC is typically associated with higher distractibility, and schizophrenia is typically associated with impoverished WMC. Here, participants performed verbal and spatial serial recall tasks that were accompanied by to-be-ignored speech tokens. For the few trials wherein one speech token was replaced with a different token, impairment was produced to task scores (a deviation effect). Participants subsequently completed a schizotypy questionnaire and a WMC measure. Higher schizotypy scores were associated with lower WMC (as measured with operation span, OSPAN), but WMC and schizotypy scores explained unique variance in relation to the mean magnitude of the deviation effect. These results suggest that schizotypy is associated with heightened domain-general distractibility, but that this is independent of its relationship with WMC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distraction; Domain-specificity; Schizophrenia; Schizotypy; Verbal working memory; Visuo-spatial working memory; Working memory capacity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27028661     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1172094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  4 in total

1.  Association of Schizotypy With Dimensions of Cognitive Control: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Maria Steffens; Inga Meyhöfer; Kaja Fassbender; Ulrich Ettinger; Joseph Kambeitz
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 2.  Linking RDoC and HiTOP: A new interface for advancing psychiatric nosology and neuroscience.

Authors:  Giorgia Michelini; Isabella M Palumbo; Colin G DeYoung; Robert D Latzman; Roman Kotov
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2021-03-24

3.  Are individual differences in auditory processing related to auditory distraction by irrelevant sound? A replication study.

Authors:  Emily M Elliott; John E Marsh; Jenna Zeringue; Corey I McGill
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-01

4.  How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Tom A Campbell; François Vachon; Paul J Taylor; Robert W Hughes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.