Amber D Rochette1, Mary Beth Spitznagel, Lawrence H Sweet, Ronald A Cohen, Richard Josephson, Joel Hughes, John Gunstad. 1. Amber D. Rochette, BA Graduate Student, Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Ohio. Mary Beth Spitznagel, PhD Assistant Professor, Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, and Clinical Psychologist, Department of Psychiatry, Summa Health System, Akron, Ohio. Lawrence H. Sweet, PhD Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens. Ronald A. Cohen, PhD Professor, Department of Aging & Geriatric Research, University of Florida, Gainesville. Richard Josephson, PhD Professor of Medicine, Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, and Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio. Joel Hughes, PhD Professor, Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Ohio. John Gunstad, PhD Professor, Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Ohio.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cognitive deficits are found in up to 73% of persons with heart failure (HF) and are associated with increased mortality and other poor clinical outcomes. It is known that women have better memory test performance than men do in healthy samples, but gender differences in cognitive performance in the context of HF are not well understood and may have important clinical implications. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine possible gender differences in cognitive function in a sample of individuals with HF (98.9% New York Heart Association class II and III). METHODS: A total of 183 adults with HF (116 men and 67 women) completed a neuropsychological test battery as part of a larger project. Measures were chosen to assess functioning in attention/executive function and memory. RESULTS: After controlling for demographic and medical factors, multivariate analysis of covariance revealed that men and women differed on memory test performance (λ = 0.90, F4, 169 = 4.76, P = .001). Post hoc comparisons revealed that women performed better on California Verbal Learning Test Learning, Short Recall, and Delayed Recall. No differences emerged on tests of attention/executive function (λ = 0.97, F5, 168 = 0.96, P = .44). CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of persons with HF, men exhibited poorer performance on memory measures than women did. Future studies are needed to determine the underlying mechanisms for this pattern and its possible influence on daily function.
BACKGROUND:Cognitive deficits are found in up to 73% of persons with heart failure (HF) and are associated with increased mortality and other poor clinical outcomes. It is known that women have better memory test performance than men do in healthy samples, but gender differences in cognitive performance in the context of HF are not well understood and may have important clinical implications. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine possible gender differences in cognitive function in a sample of individuals with HF (98.9% New York Heart Association class II and III). METHODS: A total of 183 adults with HF (116 men and 67 women) completed a neuropsychological test battery as part of a larger project. Measures were chosen to assess functioning in attention/executive function and memory. RESULTS: After controlling for demographic and medical factors, multivariate analysis of covariance revealed that men and women differed on memory test performance (λ = 0.90, F4, 169 = 4.76, P = .001). Post hoc comparisons revealed that women performed better on California Verbal Learning Test Learning, Short Recall, and Delayed Recall. No differences emerged on tests of attention/executive function (λ = 0.97, F5, 168 = 0.96, P = .44). CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of persons with HF, men exhibited poorer performance on memory measures than women did. Future studies are needed to determine the underlying mechanisms for this pattern and its possible influence on daily function.
Authors: Caitlin S Moore; Ivy N Miller; Renee L Andersen; Stephan Arndt; William G Haynes; David J Moser Journal: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol Date: 2010-05-28 Impact factor: 2.475
Authors: S A H van Hooren; A M Valentijn; H Bosma; R W H M Ponds; M P J van Boxtel; J Jolles Journal: Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn Date: 2007-01
Authors: Michael L Alosco; Mary Beth Spitznagel; Manfred van Dulmen; Naftali Raz; Ronald Cohen; Lawrence H Sweet; Lisa H Colbert; Richard Josephson; Joel Hughes; Jim Rosneck; John Gunstad Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2012-10-31 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Karen Harkness; George A Heckman; Noori Akhtar-Danesh; Catherine Demers; Elizabeth Gunn; Robert S McKelvie Journal: Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs Date: 2013-06-03 Impact factor: 3.908
Authors: Victoria E Sanborn; Mary-Beth Spitznagel; Ross Crosby; Kristine Steffen; James Mitchell; John Gunstad Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 4.734