Literature DB >> 27028576

A Comparison of Inverse-Wishart Prior Specifications for Covariance Matrices in Multilevel Autoregressive Models.

N K Schuurman1, R P P P Grasman2, E L Hamaker1.   

Abstract

Multilevel autoregressive models are especially suited for modeling between-person differences in within-person processes. Fitting these models with Bayesian techniques requires the specification of prior distributions for all parameters. Often it is desirable to specify prior distributions that have negligible effects on the resulting parameter estimates. However, the conjugate prior distribution for covariance matrices-the Inverse-Wishart distribution-tends to be informative when variances are close to zero. This is problematic for multilevel autoregressive models, because autoregressive parameters are usually small for each individual, so that the variance of these parameters will be small. We performed a simulation study to compare the performance of three Inverse-Wishart prior specifications suggested in the literature, when one or more variances for the random effects in the multilevel autoregressive model are small. Our results show that the prior specification that uses plug-in ML estimates of the variances performs best. We advise to always include a sensitivity analysis for the prior specification for covariance matrices of random parameters, especially in autoregressive models, and to include a data-based prior specification in this analysis. We illustrate such an analysis by means of an empirical application on repeated measures data on worrying and positive affect.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inverse-Wishart; covariance matrix; hierarchical Bayesian modeling; multilevel autoregressive model; noninformative prior; time series

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27028576     DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1065398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res        ISSN: 0027-3171            Impact factor:   5.923


  8 in total

1.  A Multiprocess Item Response Model for Not-Reached Items due to Time Limits and Quitting.

Authors:  Esther Ulitzsch; Matthias von Davier; Steffi Pohl
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.821

2.  Fitting Multilevel Vector Autoregressive Models in Stan, JAGS, and Mplus.

Authors:  Yanling Li; Julie Wood; Linying Ji; Sy-Miin Chow; Zita Oravecz
Journal:  Struct Equ Modeling       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 6.181

3.  A Lasso and a Regression Tree Mixed-Effect Model with Random Effects for the Level, the Residual Variance, and the Autocorrelation.

Authors:  Steffen Nestler; Sarah Humberg
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  Environmental coupling of heritability and selection is rare and of minor evolutionary significance in wild populations.

Authors:  Jip J C Ramakers; Antica Culina; Marcel E Visser; Phillip Gienapp
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 15.460

5.  On the Use of Mixed Markov Models for Intensive Longitudinal Data.

Authors:  S de Haan-Rietdijk; P Kuppens; C S Bergeman; L B Sheeber; N B Allen; E L Hamaker
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  A Two-Stage Approach for Bayesian Joint Models of Longitudinal and Survival Data: Correcting Bias with Informative Prior.

Authors:  Valeria Leiva-Yamaguchi; Danilo Alvares
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 2.524

7.  An investigation of emotion dynamics in major depressive disorder patients and healthy persons using sparse longitudinal networks.

Authors:  Stijn de Vos; Klaas J Wardenaar; Elisabeth H Bos; Ernst C Wit; Mara E J Bouwmans; Peter de Jonge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Discrete- vs. Continuous-Time Modeling of Unequally Spaced Experience Sampling Method Data.

Authors:  Silvia de Haan-Rietdijk; Manuel C Voelkle; Loes Keijsers; Ellen L Hamaker
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.