Literature DB >> 27028537

The influence of different maternal pushing positions on birth outcomes at the second stage of labor in nulliparous women.

Ozlem Moraloglu1, Hatice Kansu-Celik1, Yasemin Tasci1, Burcu Kısa Karakaya1, Yasar Yilmaz1, Ebru Cakir1, Halil Ibrahim Yakut2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects on neonatal and maternal outcomes of different pushing positions during the second stage of labor in nulliparous women.
METHODS: This prospective study included 102 healthy, pregnant, nulliparous women who were randomly allocated to either of two positions: a squatting using bars (n = 51), or a supine position modified to 45 degree of semi-fowler (n = 51) during the second stage of labor. Duration of the second stage of labor, maternal pain, postpartum blood loss, abnormal fetal heart rate patterns that required intervention, and newborn outcomes were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: The trial showed that women who adopted the squatting position using bars experienced a significant reduction in the duration of the second stage of labor; they were less likely to be induced, and their Visual Analog Scale score was lower than those who were allocated the supine position modified to 45 degree of semi-fowler during second stage of labor (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences with regard to postpartum blood loss, neonatal birth weight, Apgar score at one and five minutes, or admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.
CONCLUSIONS: In healthy nulliparous women, adopting a squatting position using bars was associated with a shorter second stage of labor, lower Visual Analog Scale score, more satisfaction, and a reduction in oxytocin requirements compared with adopting the supine position. For Turkish women, the squatting position is easy to adopt as it is more appropriate in terms of Turkish social habits and traditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pushing; second stage of labor; squatting position; supine position; visual Analog Scale

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27028537     DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2016.1169525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  10 in total

Review 1.  Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour.

Authors:  Andrea Lemos; Melania Mr Amorim; Armele Dornelas de Andrade; Ariani I de Souza; José Eulálio Cabral Filho; Jailson B Correia
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-26

2.  A Hospital-Based Randomized Controlled Trial-Comparing the Outcome of Normal Delivery Between Squatting and Lying Down Positions During Labour.

Authors:  Priyanka Vijay Shedmake; S R Wakode
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-03-13

3.  Redefining Second Stage of Labor: Number of Pushing Contractions.

Authors:  Serin M Bok; Gabriela E Pena Carmona; Jake Crawford; Ramy Eskander; Mina Desai; Michael G Ross
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2020-06-19

4.  Response to concerns about the use of delivery table shield in the vaginal delivery of the pregnant women with suspected/diagnosed COVID-19.

Authors:  Dilek Sahin; Atakan Tanacan; Ozlem Moraloglu Tekin
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 5.  A review and comparison of common maternal positions during the second-stage of labor.

Authors:  Jing Huang; Yu Zang; Li-Hua Ren; Feng-Juan Li; Hong Lu
Journal:  Int J Nurs Sci       Date:  2019-06-20

6.  Effect of maternal birth positions on duration of second stage of labor: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marta Berta; Helena Lindgren; Kyllike Christensson; Sollomon Mekonnen; Mulat Adefris
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Comprehensive pregnancy monitoring with a network of wireless, soft, and flexible sensors in high- and low-resource health settings.

Authors:  Dennis Ryu; Dong Hyun Kim; Joan T Price; Jong Yoon Lee; Ha Uk Chung; Emily Allen; Jessica R Walter; Hyoyoung Jeong; Jingyue Cao; Elena Kulikova; Hajar Abu-Zayed; Rachel Lee; Knute L Martell; Michael Zhang; Brianna R Kampmeier; Marc Hill; JooHee Lee; Edward Kim; Yerim Park; Hokyung Jang; Hany Arafa; Claire Liu; Maureen Chisembele; Bellington Vwalika; Ntazana Sindano; M Bridget Spelke; Amy S Paller; Ashish Premkumar; William A Grobman; Jeffrey S A Stringer; John A Rogers; Shuai Xu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Effect of Flexible Sacrum Position on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Public Health Facilities, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

Authors:  Marta Berta Badi; Solomon Mekonnen Abebe; Mulat Adefris Weldetsadic; Kyllike Christensson; Helena Lindgren
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.614

9.  Factors Associated With Normal Physiologic Birth for Women Who Labor In Water: A Secondary Analysis of A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Jane Carpenter; Ethel Burns; Lesley Smith
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.891

10.  Exploring the perspective of nursing staff or caregivers on birthing positions in Central India.

Authors:  Anita Yadav; Anusha Kamath; Shuchita Mundle; Jyoti Baghel; Charu Sharma; Avinash Prakash
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2021-04-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.