OBJECTIVES: To describe medium- to long-term follow-up of patients undergoing device closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) for stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). BACKGROUND: Transcatheter device closure of PFO continues to be used for secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke or TIA, but data are lacking regarding long-term outcomes. METHODS: We reviewed the Mayo Clinic Rochester PFO database for patients who underwent device closure of PFO for secondary prevention of stroke/TIA from December 2001 to June 2012. Demographic, clinical, procedural, and follow-up data were reviewed. Recurrence rate of stroke/TIA were calculated. Data were analyzed to identify risk factors of recurrent neurologic events. RESULTS: Seven hundred and thirty patients (mean age 53 years; 40% female) were included in our study. Most patients (72%) had cryptogenic stroke as their qualifying event for PFO closure. There were no procedure-related deaths or strokes. The most commonly used device was the Amplatzer Septal Occluder (82%). Median follow-up was 6 years. A 3.9% of patients had documented residual right-to-left shunting at last echocardiogram. Recurrent stroke and/or TIA were reported in 45 patients, (6.3% of patients with follow-up data). Patients who experienced recurrent stroke/TIA were older and had a higher rate of diabetes and hypertension than those who did not. The presence of residual shunt did not correlate with risk of recurrent events. CONCLUSIONS: Device closure of PFO can be performed safely with very good long-term resolution of atrial shunting. Recurrent neurologic events after PFO closure may reflect additional comorbid risk factors unrelated to the potential for paradoxical embolism.
OBJECTIVES: To describe medium- to long-term follow-up of patients undergoing device closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) for stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). BACKGROUND: Transcatheter device closure of PFO continues to be used for secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke or TIA, but data are lacking regarding long-term outcomes. METHODS: We reviewed the Mayo Clinic Rochester PFO database for patients who underwent device closure of PFO for secondary prevention of stroke/TIA from December 2001 to June 2012. Demographic, clinical, procedural, and follow-up data were reviewed. Recurrence rate of stroke/TIA were calculated. Data were analyzed to identify risk factors of recurrent neurologic events. RESULTS: Seven hundred and thirty patients (mean age 53 years; 40% female) were included in our study. Most patients (72%) had cryptogenic stroke as their qualifying event for PFO closure. There were no procedure-related deaths or strokes. The most commonly used device was the Amplatzer Septal Occluder (82%). Median follow-up was 6 years. A 3.9% of patients had documented residual right-to-left shunting at last echocardiogram. Recurrent stroke and/or TIA were reported in 45 patients, (6.3% of patients with follow-up data). Patients who experienced recurrent stroke/TIA were older and had a higher rate of diabetes and hypertension than those who did not. The presence of residual shunt did not correlate with risk of recurrent events. CONCLUSIONS: Device closure of PFO can be performed safely with very good long-term resolution of atrial shunting. Recurrent neurologic events after PFO closure may reflect additional comorbid risk factors unrelated to the potential for paradoxical embolism.
Authors: Alexander E Merkler; Gino Gialdini; Shadi Yaghi; Peter M Okin; Costantino Iadecola; Babak B Navi; Hooman Kamel Journal: Stroke Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Elisabetta Mariucci; Andrea Donti; Luisa Salomone; Marta Marcia; Marta Guidarini; Roberto Formigari; Daniela Prandstraller; Anna Balducci; Gabriele Bronzetti; Marco Bonvicini Journal: Cardiol Res Pract Date: 2017-12-21 Impact factor: 1.866
Authors: Sibylle Wilfling; Mustafa Kilic; Blagovesta Tsoneva; Martin Freyer; David Olmes; Christina Wendl; Ralf A Linker; Felix Schlachetzki Journal: Brain Circ Date: 2022-03-21