Silencing of Prrx1b suppresses cellular proliferation, migration, invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in triple-negative breast cancer.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly aggressive tumour subtype associated with poor prognosis. The mechanisms involved in TNBC progression remains largely unknown. To date, there are no effective therapeutic targets for this tumour subtype. Paired-related homeobox 1b (Prrx1b), one of major isoforms of Prrx1, has been identified as a new epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) inducer. However, the function of Prrx1b in TNBC has not been elucidated. In this study, we found that Prrx1b was significantly up-regulated in TNBC and associated with tumour size and vascular invasion of breast cancer. Silencing of Prrx1b suppressed the proliferation, migration and invasion of basal-like cancer cells. Moreover, silencing of Prrx1b prevented Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and induced the mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET). Taken together, our data indicated that Prrx1b may be an important regulator of EMT in TNBC cells and a new therapeutic target for interventions against TNBC invasion and metastasis.

Introduction

Triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an invasive type of breast carcinoma that lacks expression of the oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) as well as human epidermal growth factor receptor‐2 (HER‐2) amplification. TNBC constitutes approximately 10–17% of all invasive breast carcinomas and tend to more frequently affect younger patients 1, 2. TNBC tumours are also generally larger in size, of a higher grade, present lymph node involvement at the time of diagnosis, and are biologically more aggressive 3. As a result of the heterogeneity of this disease and the absence of well‐defined molecular targets, the treatment of TNBC has remained challenging. Indeed, less than 30% of women with metastatic TNBC survive for 5 years despite normative adjuvant chemotherapy 4. Clearly, there is an urgent need for useful biomarkers that can predict the metastatic potential of TNBC and serve as prognostic indicators or targets for treatment.

As we all know, metastasis is a complex process including a succession of changes, mesenchymal transition of local cancer cells, reorganization of actin cytoskeleton, microenvironment formation and colonization formation 5. Among them, mesenchymal transition of cancer cells, termed as epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), has drawn much attention in breast cancer metastasis research 6, 7. During EMT, epithelial cells lose polarity and E‐cadherin mediated adhesion at the adherens junctions. Subsequent to these morphological and biochemical changes, cells acquire the motile and invasive phenotype characteristics of mesenchymal cells 8. These cells express the mesenchymal markers, such as vimentin, fibronectin, N‐cadherin, twist and snail 9. However, the molecular mechanisms that govern the overarching framework of EMT plasticity have yet to be elucidated.

Paired‐related homeobox 1 (Prrx1) has recently been observed to promote EMT in breast, pancreatic, and colon cancers 10, 11, 12. In some tumours such as breast cancer, however, low Prrx1 levels were associated with metastasis and poor prognosis in clinical samples 10, whereas in colorectal adenocarcinomas abundant Prrx1 expression was associated with metastasis and poor prognosis 13. Those results may suggest that Prrx1 expression is associated with different phenotypes in different types of cancer cells. Prrx1b is one of major isoforms of Prrx1 encodes for a 217‐amino acid product that is identical from the N terminus to amino acid 199 14. Studies have found that Prrx1b fosters ductal cell proliferation and self‐renewal. Importantly, Prrx1b appears to be critical for regeneration after cerulein‐induced pancreatitis and annotates a subpopulation of ductal cells with self‐renewal capacity. Furthermore, Prrx1b positively regulates Sox9 gene expression and binds the Sox9 promoter. The Sox9 transcriptional factor is associated with acinar‐ductal metaplasia and regulates a transcriptional program in pancreatic progenitor cells during development 15. Obviously, most of our knowledge on Prrx1b functions derives from cell biology studies, much less is known about the role of Prrx1b in human diseases. Most recently, Takano et al. 16 reported that Prrx1b promotes EMT, tumour invasion and tumour dedifferentiation in pancreatic cancer. However, the function of Prrx1b in TNBC remains largely unknown. It is meaningful to understand the role of Prrx1b in breast carcinogenesis.

In this study, we investigated the expression of Prrx1b in TNBC and silencing of Prrx1b could inhibit the proliferation, migration, invasion and EMT in both MDA‐MB‐231 and MDA‐MB‐468 cells for the first time. Meanwhile, we further verified that the underlying mechanisms during the process might be associated with the Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway.

Materials and methods

Clinical samples

A total of 141 pairs of TNBC and adjacent non‐cancerous tissue samples were obtained from patients who underwent modified radical mastectomy in the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University. The matched non‐cancerous adjacent tissues were harvested at least 5 cm away from the tumour site. None of patients had received chemotherapy, radiotherapy and other related anti‐tumour therapies before surgery. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, and research protocols for the use of human tissue were approved by and conducted in accordance with the policies of the Institutional Review Boards at Qingdao University. The histological subtype was determined according to the World Health Organization classification. The Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) stage was determined post‐operatively according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (7th edition), and the histological grade was determined according to the Scarff–Bloom–Richardson grading system.

Cell culture

Three breast cancer cell lines with a basal‐like transcriptional profile (MDA‐MB‐468, MDA‐MB‐231 and HCC‐1937) and a human breast epithelial cell line (MCF‐10A) were obtained from the Cancer Research Institute of Beijing, China. These cells were cultivated in T75 tissue culture flasks in DMEM supplemented with 10% foetal calf serum, 100 IU/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 2 mM L‐glutamine and 20 mM hydroxyethyl piperazine ethanesulfonic acid, and incubated in humidified incubator containing 5% CO2 at 37°C.

RNA interference‐based gene silencing experiment

Lentivirus plasmid containing short hairpin RNA (shRNA) of Prrx1b and negative control were designed and produced by Genechem (Shanghai, China). For the transfection, MDA‐MB‐468 and MDA‐MB‐231 cells were seeded in 6‐well plates and allowed to attach overnight; then, the culture medium was replaced with transfection enhancing solution with 30 moi lentivirus and 50 μg/ml polybrene, respectively. After 16 h of transfection, we replaced the transfection medium with the normal one. Cells were harvested for passage or testing when they occupied 80% of the plate.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Briefly, tissue samples were fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin. Sections were dewaxed in xylene and rehydrated through graded alcohols and water, and endogenous peroxidases were inactivated with 3% hydrogen peroxide in PBS, followed by incubation with the primary antibody overnight at 4°C and with the biotinylated secondary antibody at room temperature for 1 h. Omission of the primary antibody was used as a negative control. Then, the sections were detected with a streptavidin‐peroxidase complex. Scoring was conducted according to the ratio and intensity of positive‐staining cells: 0–5% scored 0; 6–35% scored 1; 36–70% scored 2; more than 70% scored 3. The final score of Prrx1b expression was designated as low or high expression group as follows: low expression: score 0–1; high expression: score 2–3. All the scores of Prrx1b expression were done in a blinded manner and determined independently by two senior pathologists.

RNA extraction and qRT‐PCR analysis

Total RNAs were extracted from cells using RNAiso Plus (Takara, Dalian, China). Reverse transcription was performed with PrimeScript™ Master Mix (Takara, Dalian, China) according to its product manual. Then, the qRT‐PCR was performed with SYBR Premix EX Taq™ II (Takara, Dalian, China) according to its product manual on the real‐time PCR detection system Bio‐Rad IQ5 (Bio‐Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Using β‐actin as the reference, the data were analysed with a normalized gene expression method (ddCt) through the IQ5 Optical System Software.

Western blotting analysis

Tissues or cells were lysed in RIPA buffer supplemented with protease inhibitor mixture for 30 min. at 4°C. The cell lysates were then sonicated briefly and centrifuged (14,000 ×g at 4°C) for 15 min. to remove insoluble materials. Equal amounts of protein were separated by SDS‐PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane. Membranes were blocked with 5% non‐fat dry milk and then incubated with first antibody, followed by horseradish peroxidase‐conjugated secondary antibody.

Transcriptional reporter gene assay

Cells were seeded on white bottomed 96‐well plates at a concentration of 5000 cells per well. 200 ng TOPflash (TCF Reporter Plasmid) or FOPflash (mutant TCF binding sites) expression plasmids and 10 ng pRL‐TK were cotransfected into the cells. After 24 h, luciferase activity was measured by using Dual‐Glo Luciferase reporter Assay System according to the manufacturer's instructions. The ratio of TOPflash/FOPflash was determined each normalized to the luciferase activities of the Renilla‐TK‐luciferase vector.

MTT proliferation assay

The capability of cellular proliferation was measured by the [3‐(4, 5‐dimethylthiazol‐ 2‐yl)‐2, 5‐diphenyltetrazolium bromide] MTT assay. Approximately, 5 × 103 cells were seeded into 96‐well culture plates, then cells were incubated with 20 μl MTT (10 mg/ml) for 4 h at 37°C and 200 μl DMSO was pipetted to solubilize the formazan product for 20 min. at room temperature. The optical density was determined using a spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 570 nm. The experiment was repeated three times in triplicate.

Wound healing assay

A wound healing assay was performed to examine cell migration. Briefly, after the cells grew to 85% confluence in six‐well plates, Wound was created by scraping with a pipette tip and the debris was washed with PBS. Photographs were taken at indicated time‐points to assess the ability of the cells to migrate into the wound area. The scratch wounds were photographed using a Nikon inverted microscope with an attached digital camera, and the widths of the wounds were quantified using Image software. Experiments were carried out in triplicate at least three times.

Migration and invasion assay

Chambers (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) with or without matrigel (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) bedding were placed in 24‐well plates. Cells (1 × 104) that were starved overnight were added to the upper chamber room in 200 μl of serum‐free medium, respectively, while 500 μl of complete medium to the bottom chamber room.

After 24 h of incubation, cells in the upper room were fixed with 95% ethanol and stained for 30 min. with 4 g/L crystal violet. Cells on the underside of the chambers were counted under a 200× microscope field after the topside of the filter was wiped. Three independent invasion assays were performed in triplicate. Five random fields on average were counted using a light microscope.

Mouse xenograft model

Six‐week‐old female athymic nude (nu/nu) mice (SLAC, Shanghai, China) were injected subcutaneously in the right flank with the stable single cell clones of Prrx1/sh2 or control cells at 3 × 106 cells in 100 μl serum‐free DMEM medium for each nude mouse. Each group had eight mice. After 6 weeks, the mice were killed, necropsies were performed, and the tumours were weighed. The tumour volumes were determined according to the following formula: A × B2/2, where A is the largest diameter and B is the diameter perpendicular to A. Then, their tumours were separated after infusion and fixed in formaldehyde for haematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemistry detection. All of the animal procedures were performed in accordance with institutional guidelines.

Statistical analysis

Data were presented as means ± SD. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 17.0 software (San Rafael, CA, USA). Student's t‐test was used for comparison between groups. The relationship between Prrx1b expression and the differential expression of EMT biomarkers (E‐cadherin and vimentin) was analysed using Chi‐squared test (χ2 test) and Pearson's correlation test. Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Expression of Prrx1b protein in breast cancer tissues

We analysed the protein expression level of Prrx1b in TNBC and matched adjacent non‐cancerous tissues by IHC method. All tissues were divided into two groups: the high expression level group and the low expression level group. The IHC staining results showed that Prrx1b expression was restricted to the nucleus and the stronger Prrx1b staining was detected in TNBC samples than that in matched adjacent non‐cancerous tissues, with high expression in 62.41% (88/141) of TNBC samples and only in 12.06% (17/141) of corresponding non‐malignant tissues (Fig. 1A, Table 1). We then examined the mRNA expression level of Prrx1b in TNBC and matched adjacent non‐cancerous tissues by RT‐PCR (Fig. 1B). Through statistical analysis with relative mRNA level of Prrx1b in TNBC from 141 patients, we found that the cancer tissues expressed higher Prrx1b mRNA compared to the matched non‐cancerous adjacent tissues (Fig. 1C). Furthermore, we analysed the relevance of Prrx1b expression with patients clinicopathological parameters and found that high expression of Prrx1b was closely related with adverse clinicopathological parameters of TNBC, including tumour size (P < 0.001) and vascular invasion (P = 0.007) (Table 1).

Figure 1

The Prrx1b expression levels were frequently up‐regulated in TNBC. (A) Immunohistochemistry analysis of Prrx1b protein in TNBC and adjacent non‐cancerous tissue samples. Magnification, 200×. (B) RT‐PCR analysis demonstrated the expression of Prrx1b in TNBC and matched adjacent non‐cancerous tissues. β‐actin served as loading control. (C) Statistical analysis with relative level of Prrx1b in paired TNBC tissue samples from 141 patients. N non‐malignant breast tissues, T primary breast tissues. Prrx1b, Paired‐related homeobox 1b; TNBC, Triple‐negative breast cancer.

Table 1

Correlation of Prrx1b expression with patient's clinical and pathological characteristics

Clinicopathological variables	Cases	Prrx1b expression level		P value
		No of low expression	No of high expression
TNBC	141	53	88	0.000
Control group	141	124	17
Age(years)
≤45	79	34	45	0.132
>45	62	19	43
Tumour size(cm)
≤2	60	33	27	<0.001a
>2	81	20	61
Differentiation grade
Well‐moderate	56	18	38	0.279
Poor‐undifferentiation	85	35	50
Vascular invasion
Negative	89	41	48	0.007a
Positive	52	12	40
Lymph node status
Negative	90	37	53	0.251
Positive	51	16	35
TNM stage
I	84	29	55	0.362
II–III	57	24	33

Prrx1b, Paired‐related homeobox 1b; TNBC, Triple‐negative breast cancer.

P < 0.05.

Silencing of Prrx1b suppresses breast cancer cell proliferation in vitro and tumour growth in vivo

The expression of Prrx1b was up‐regulated in HCC‐1937, MDA‐MB‐468 and MDA‐MB‐231 cells compared to the breast epithelial cell line MCF‐10A. The highest Prrx1b expression was found in MDA‐MB‐231 (Fig. 2A). Prrx1b highly expressed cell lines MDA‐MB‐468 and MDA‐MB‐231 were transfected with Lenti‐shPrrx1b‐(1, 2), designated as Sh1 and Sh2, or a mock vector, which was labelled as control. The silencing effects of the Lenti‐shRNAs in these two cell lines were validated by western blotting (Fig. 2B and C). The results showed that Prrx1b protein expression levels were significantly decreased by RNA interference, especially Sh2. Interestingly, we found Prrx1b silenced MDA‐MB‐231 cells lost their fibroblast‐like appearance with long shape and central nucleus and acquired an epithelial morphology (Fig. 2D).

Figure 2

Silencing of Prrx1b induces morphological alterations in breast cancer cell lines. (A) The expression of Prrx1b in cell lysates from three basal‐like breast cancer cell lines (HCC‐1937, MDA‐MB‐468, and MDA‐MB‐231) and breast epithelial cell line MCF‐10A was detected by western blotting and normalized with GAPDH expression. Silencing of Prrx1b in MDA‐MB‐468 (B) and MDA‐MB‐231 (C) cells significantly decreased Prrx1b expression, detected by western blotting and normalized with GAPDH expression. (D) Cell morphology of Prrx1b silenced MDA‐MB‐231 cells and c ontrol cells. Magnification, 200×. *P < 0.05. Prrx1b, Paired‐related homeobox 1b.

To explore the effect of Prrx1b on breast cancer cell growth, MDA‐MB‐468 and MDA‐MB‐231 transfected with Sh1 and Sh2 were used to detect cell proliferation by MTT assay. The results showed that silencing of Prrx1b significantly suppressed the proliferation of the MDA‐MB‐468 and MDA‐MB‐231 cells in vitro (P < 0.01) (Fig. 3A and B). To confirm the role of Prrx1b in breast cancer cell proliferation in vivo, MDA‐MB‐231/sh2 and control cells were inoculated subcutaneously into nude mice. Six weeks later, tumours derived from the Sh2 cells were significantly smaller than those derived from the control cells (Fig. 3C). The average tumour weight and volume of MDA‐MB‐231/control mice were 0.16 ± 0.02 g and 0.13 ± 0.03 cm3, in contrast to 0.05 ± 0.01 g and 0.04 ± 0.01 cm3 in MDA‐MB‐231/sh2 mice (P < 0.01) (Fig. 3D). Prrx1b expression in the tumours was stained by IHC and the results showed that Prrx1b expression level in MDA‐MB‐231/Sh2 derived tumours was much lower than that in control (Fig. 3E).

Figure 3

Silencing of Prrx1b suppresses breast cancer cell proliferation in vitro and tumour growth in vivo. The cell proliferation of control and sh1, sh2 groups in MDA‐MB‐468 (A) and MDA‐MB‐231 (B) was determined by MTT assay at 0, 24, 48, 72, 96 h, respectively. (C) Morphologic characteristics of tumours from mice inoculated with MDA‐MB‐231/Control and MDA‐MB‐231/sh2 cells. (D) Tumour volumes and weights of control and Sh2 groups from C. (E) Decreased Prrx1b expression in xenograft tumours from the Prrx1b silenced group compared with the control group, detected by immunohistochemistry staining. Each group had eight mice. Magnification, 100×. Prrx1b, Paired‐related homeobox 1b.

Silencing of Prrx1b suppresses breast cancer cell invasion and migration in vitro

To further investigate the functional role of Prrx1b in breast cancer, we examined the effects of Prrx1b on breast cancer cell migration and invasion in vitro. Compared to the control group, silencing of Prrx1b significantly inhibited MDA‐MB‐468 and MDA‐MB‐231 cells migration in vitro by wound healing assay and transwell migration assay. Moreover, silencing of Prrx1b also suppressed breast cancer cell invasion in vitro by transwell invasion assay (Fig. 4). Our data showed that silencing of Prrx1b by shRNA significantly suppressed the migration and invasion of MDA‐MB‐468 and MDA‐MB‐231 cells.

Figure 4

Silencing of Prrx1b suppresses breast cancer migration and invasion in vitro. (A) Representative wound healing images of MDA‐MB‐231. Quantification of wound healing rates was analysed in MDA‐MB‐468 (B) cells and MDA‐MB‐231 (C) cells. (D) Representative migration images of MDA‐MB‐468 and MDA‐MB‐231 silenced and control cells. (E) Representative invasion images of MDA‐MB‐468 and MDA‐MB‐231 silenced and control cells. (F, G) Quantifications of cells on the lower surface of the membrane. *P <0.05. Prrx1b, Paired‐related homeobox 1b.

Silencing of Prrx1b induces mesenchymal‐epithelial transition (MET) in breast cancer cells

We further examined the expression of EMT‐related proteins in MDA‐MB‐231 cells, including E‐cadherin, cytokeratin and vimentin by western blotting and the results revealed that epithelium‐specific E‐cadherin and cytokeratin expression ware significantly elevated by silencing of Prrx1b, whereas the intensity of mesenchyme‐specific vimentin was decreased significantly in Prrx1b silenced cells. (Fig. 5A,B,C). Since matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)‐2 and MMP‐9 have been demonstrated to be closely associated with invasion and migration in many tumour cells, we then assessed whether Prrx1b knockdown in breast cancer cells had an effect on the expression of MMP‐2 and MMP‐9. Western blotting was carried out, and the results showed that the knockdown of Prrx1b significantly decreased the level of MMP‐2 and MMP‐9 in MDA‐MB‐231 cells.

Figure 5

Silencing of Prrx1b induces mesenchymal‐epithelial transition in MDA‐MB‐231. Silencing of Prrx1b decreased the expression of vimentin (A), but increased the expression of E‐cadherin (B) and cytokeratin (C) detected by western blotting and analysed by normalizing to GAPDH expression. (D) The level of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)‐2 and MMP‐9 in MDA‐MB‐231 cells were determined by western blotting. *P < 0.05. Prrx1b, Paired‐related homeobox 1b.

To further confirm the relationship between Prrx1b and EMT in breast cancer, we investigated the expression level of Prrx1b, E‐cadherin and vimentin in the tissue microarray that contained 115 TNBC samples. Breast cancer tissues with high Prrx1b expression generally expressed high levels of vimentin and lost E‐cadherin expression, whereas low Prrx1b expressed tissues exhibited high E‐cadherin and low vimentin expression profile. Majority of Prrx1b highly expressed breast cancer tissues exhibited low E‐cadherin expression (63/85) and high vimentin expression (62/85). Pearson correlation analysis showed that Prrx1b expression negatively correlated with the expression of E‐cadherin (P = 0.003), and positively correlated with the expression of vimentin (P = 0.009). Obviously, Prrx1b was closely associated with decreased epithelial characteristics and increased mesenchymal traits (Table 2).

Table 2

Pearson's correlation analysis to evaluate the association between Prrx1b, ‐cadherin and vimentin expression in 115 breast cancer tissues

Variable expression	Cases (n = 115)	Prrx1b expression level		P value
		No of low expression	No of high expression
E‐cadherin
Low	76	63	13	0.003a
High	39	22	17
Vimentin
Low	41	23	18	0.009a
High	74	62	12

Prrx1b, Paired‐related homeobox 1b.

P < 0.05.

Silencing of Prrx1b inhibits Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway

It has been reported that EMT‐transcription factors can regulate E‐cadherin expression in specific cellular contexts and coordinately control the EMT program. Therefore, the mRNA levels of Zinc Finger E‐boxbinding homeobox1 (ZEB1), ZEB2, snail, twist and slug, the key transcription factors that promote EMT, were determined by Real‐time PCR. The results showed that ZEB1, ZEB2, snail and twist were significantly decreased in Prrx1b silenced cells (P < 0.05), while Slug remained unchanged (Fig. 6A). It was reported that Wnt/β‐catenin played an important role in the process of EMT in breast cancer cells. To uncover the potential mechanism of MET induced by silencing of Prrx1b, we first used cell fractionation method to examine β‐catenin distribution in the nucleus and cytoplasm; the western blotting results showed that nuclear β‐catenin was significantly decreased in Prrx1b silenced cells compared to that in control (Fig. 6B and C). Second, we further examined the activation of the canonical Wnt pathway with a Wnt/β‐catenin reporter plasmid and negative control counterpart plasmid in the MDA‐MB‐231 cells. After transfection with the plasmids for 24 h, the luciferase activity of breast cancer cells was determined. Our results showed that silencing of Prrx1b can significantly inhibit Wnt/β‐catenin signaling (Fig. 6D). The down‐stream target gene cyclin‐D1 of the Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway was down‐regulated after Prrx1b was silenced (Fig. 6E). These data indicated that silencing of Prrx1 suppressed Wnt/β‐catenin pathway activation.

Figure 6

Silencing of Prrx1b inhibits the Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway. (A) Relative mRNA expression levels of ZEB1, ZEB2, snail, twist and slug in MDA‐MB‐231 and MDA‐MB‐231 cells compared with control cells. Immunoblotting of β‐catenin in cytosolic (B) and nuclear (C) extracts of MDA‐MB‐468 and MDA‐MB‐231 cells was carried out, expression of histone H3 was used as a loading control. (D) Silencing of Prrx1b decreased TOPflash activity by TOP/FOPflash report gene assay. (E) Silencing of Prrx1b induced a reduction in cyclin‐D1 expression, one of Wnt/β‐catenin target genes. Densitometric analysis of cyclin‐D1 is shown below, normalized to GAPDH. *P < 0.05. Prrx1b, Paired‐related homeobox 1b.

Discussion

TNBC is a highly aggressive tumour subtype associated with poor prognosis. Current treatment modalities for TNBC are limited to surgery, radiation and systemic chemotherapy because of the lack of more specific therapeutic targets 17. Over the past few decades, tremendous efforts have been expended in searching for a molecular targeted therapy for TNBC and with limited success 18. In this study, we found that high expression of Prrx1b was closely related with adverse clinicopathological parameters of TNBC, including tumour size and vascular invasion, indicating that Prrx1b might participate in the development of TNBC. Our study also showed that the proliferative capacity of TNBC cells significantly decreased in vitro and in vivo, and the invasion and migration of the cancer cells also significantly decreased after Prrx1b was silenced in vitro. The results indicated that silencing of Prrx1b suppresses cellular proliferation, migration and invasion in TNBC.

EMT has been a focus in studies on the pathogenesis of breast cancer in recent years 19, 20. Cytoskeletal proteins generally induce the EMT of cells to promote the proliferation, migration and invasion of cells through reorganization of the cytoskeleton 21. The main characteristics of EMT are the following: epithelial cells lose their epithelial characteristics and acquire properties of mesenchymal cells; weakening of the intercellular junctions; facilitating migration and invasion abilities of the cells and the morphology after gaining the properties of mesenchymal cells is more advantageous to the motility, migration and expansion of the cells 22, 23. In this study, we showed the breast cancer cells acquired epithelial properties and lost mesenchymal characteristics by silencing of Prrx1b. Western blotting revealed that silencing of Prrx1b significantly decreased the expression of vimentin while increasing the expression of E‐cadherin, which led to strengthening cell–cell junctions. We also found the expression of Prrx1b in TNBC patients’ tissues negatively correlates with the expression of E‐cadherin and positively correlates with the expression of vimentin. Since MMP‐2 and MMP‐9 have been demonstrated to be closely associated with invasion and migration in many tumour cells. Accordingly, our data indicated knockdown of Prrx1b significantly decreased the invasion of TNBC cells, which might be caused by the decreased expression of MMP‐2 and MMP‐9.

Transcriptional factors such as twist1, snail1, snail2, ZEB1 and ZEB2 are also governing EMT 24. This dynamic process could be stimulated by the signals and forms the microenvironment like TGF‐β, Wnt and TNFα 25. Our current study observed that after Prrx1b was silenced in TNBC cells, the expression of the transcription factors snail, twist, ZEB1 and ZEB2 decreased significantly. They are the key transcription factors that promote EMT. In particular, ZEB1 expression was reported to be closely linked with EMT in various cancer cells, including breast cancer. Increasing studies have demonstrated that the Wnt is the major signaling pathway that involved in EMT 26, 27. It is a critical developmental pathway involved in differentiation, migration, invasion and adhesion; these cellular processes are key components of tumorigenesis and metastasis 28. To our knowledge, β‐catenin is a key regulator of Wnt pathway, and recently putative target genes of the Wnt/β‐catenin signal were identified as c‐myc and cyclin‐D1 29. In this study, we found that the expression of β‐catenin in the nucleus significantly decreased after Prrx1b was silenced. Using the luciferase reporter assay system, we revealed that the activity of the classical Wnt/β‐catenin pathway was significantly decreased after Prrx1b was silenced. Cyclin‐D1 is one of the important target genes down‐stream of the Wnt/β‐catenin pathway; silencing Prrx1b could significantly inhibit the expression of cyclin‐D1. The above experiments confirmed that the activity of the Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway was significantly decreased after Prrx1b was silenced. Thus, Prrx1b may participate in the EMT of TNBC cells through the Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway.

Taken together, we consistently showed that Prrx1b knockdown inhibited the proliferation, migration and invasive capacities of TNBC cells by reversing the EMT phenotypes of TNBC, which might be because of the repression of Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway. Our findings not only enrich the current understanding of Prrx1b's regulation of the EMT but also suggest that this molecule plays an important role in both maintaining the mesenchymal phenotype and participating in TNBC dissemination.

Author contributions

Z.D.L., Y.Z.C., B.K. and X.P.L. participated in and performed the in vivo assays. Z.D.L., L.Y.J. and Q.D. and Z.J.J. performed the western blotting assays and qRT‐PCR assays. L.Y.J., F.N.L. and S.J. performed the pathological assessment of tumours. Z.D.L. and H.B.W. conceived the study and participated in its design and coordination, Z.D.L., F.N.L. and H.B.W. drafted the manuscript. All of the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests exist.