Literature DB >> 27027419

Development and interrater reliability of the UK Mental Health Triage Scale.

Natisha Sands1, Stephen Elsom2, Robert Colgate3, Helen Haylor4, Roshani Prematunga2.   

Abstract

Mental health triage scales are clinical tools used at point of entry to specialist mental health service to provide a systematic way of categorizing the urgency of clinical presentations, and determining an appropriate service response and an optimal timeframe for intervention. The aim of the present study was to test the interrater reliability of a mental health triage scale developed for use in UK mental health triage and crisis services. An interrater reliability study was undertaken. Triage clinicians from England and Wales (n = 66) used the UK Mental Health Triage Scale (UK MHTS) to rate the urgency of 21 validated mental health triage scenarios derived from real occasions of triage. Interrater reliability was calculated using Kendall's coefficient of concordance (w) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) statistics. The average ICC was 0.997 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.996-0.999 (F (20, 1300) = 394.762, P < 0.001). The single measure ICC was 0.856 (95% CI: 0.776-0.926 (F (20, 1300) = 394.762, P < 0.001). The overall Kendall's w was 0.88 (P < 0.001). The UK MHTS shows substantial levels of interrater reliability. Reliable mental health triage scales employed within effective mental health triage systems offer possibilities for not only improved patient outcomes and experiences, but also for efficient use of finite specialist mental health services.
© 2016 The Authors International Journal of Mental Health Nursing published by Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd on behalf of Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  crisis care; mental health; psychiatric emergency; triage; triage scale

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27027419     DOI: 10.1111/inm.12197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs        ISSN: 1445-8330            Impact factor:   3.503


  4 in total

1.  Assessment of Psychiatric Disorders in Consultation-Liaison Setting.

Authors:  Malay Kumar Ghosal; Anindya Kumar Ray
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Exploring patients' experience of peer-supported open dialogue and standard care following a mental health crisis: qualitative 3-month follow-up study.

Authors:  Sailaa Sunthararajah; Katherine Clarke; Russell Razzaque; Marta Chmielowska; Benjamin Brandrett; Stephen Pilling
Journal:  BJPsych Open       Date:  2022-07-22

3.  The Chinese Mandarin Version of the Crisis Triage Rating Scale for Taiwanese with Mental Illness to Compulsory Hospitalization.

Authors:  Shuo-Yen Ting; Tsuo-Hung Lan; Lih-Jong Shen; Chun-Yuan Lin; Shih-Kai Lee; Wei-Fen Ma
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Open Dialogue compared to treatment as usual for adults experiencing a mental health crisis: Protocol for the ODDESSI multi-site cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Stephen Pilling; Katherine Clarke; Georgie Parker; Kirsty James; Sabine Landau; Timothy Weaver; Russell Razzaque; Thomas Craig
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 2.226

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.