Literature DB >> 27027384

Anticoagulants (extended duration) for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair.

Rachel Forster1, Marlene Stewart.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal duration of thromboprophylaxis after total hip or knee replacement, or hip fracture repair remains controversial. It is common practice to administer prophylaxis using low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH) until discharge from hospital, usually seven to 14 days after surgery. International guidelines recommend extending thromboprophylaxis for up to 35 days following major orthopaedic surgery but the recommendation is weak due to moderate quality evidence. In addition, recent oral anticoagulants that exert effect by direct inhibition of thrombin or activated factor X lack the need for monitoring and have few known drug interactions. Interest in this topic remains high.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of extended-duration anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in people undergoing elective hip or knee replacement surgery, or hip fracture repair. SEARCH
METHODS: The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Specialised Register (last searched May 2015) and CENTRAL (2015, Issue 4). Clinical trials databases were searched for ongoing or unpublished studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials assessing extended-duration thromboprophylaxis (five to seven weeks) using accepted prophylactic doses of LMWH, UFH, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) compared with short-duration thromboprophylaxis (seven to 14 days) followed by placebo, no treatment or similar extended-duration thromboprophylaxis with LMWH, UFH, VKA or DOACs in participants undergoing hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We independently selected trials and extracted data. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. We performed fixed-effect model meta-analyses with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used a random-effects model when there was heterogeneity. MAIN
RESULTS: We included 16 studies (24,930 participants); six compared heparin with placebo, one compared VKA with placebo, two compared DOAC with placebo, one compared VKA with heparin, five compared DOAC with heparin and one compared anticoagulants chosen at investigators' discretion with placebo. Three trials included participants undergoing knee replacement. No studies assessed hip fracture repair.Trials were generally of good methodological quality. The main reason for unclear risk of bias was insufficient reporting. The quality of evidence according to GRADE was generally moderate, as some comparisons included a single study, low number of events or heterogeneity between studies leading to wide CIs.We showed no difference between extended-duration heparin and placebo in symptomatic VTE (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.01; 2329 participants; 5 studies; high quality evidence), symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.38; 2019 participants; 4 studies; moderate quality evidence), symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.16 to 2.33; 1595 participants; 3 studies; low quality evidence) and major bleeding (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.14 to 2.46; 2500 participants; 5 studies; moderate quality evidence). Minor bleeding was increased in the heparin group (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.81; 2500 participants; 5 studies; high quality evidence). Clinically relevant non-major bleeding was not reported.We showed no difference between extended-duration VKA and placebo (one study, 360 participants) for symptomatic VTE (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.94; moderate quality evidence), symptomatic DVT (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.62; moderate quality evidence), symptomatic PE (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.84; moderate quality evidence) and major bleeding (OR 2.89, 95% CI 0.12 to 71.31; low quality evidence). Clinically relevant non-major bleeding and minor bleeding were not reported.Extended-duration DOAC showed reduced symptomatic VTE (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.68; 2419 participants; 1 study; moderate quality evidence) and symptomatic DVT (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.81; 2459 participants; 2 studies; high quality evidence) compared to placebo. No differences were found for symptomatic PE (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.25; 1733 participants; 1 study; low quality evidence), major bleeding (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.06 to 16.02; 2457 participants; 1 study; low quality evidence), clinically relevant non-major bleeding (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.95; 2457 participants; 1 study; moderate quality evidence) and minor bleeding (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.88; 2457 participants; 1 study; moderate quality evidence).We showed no difference between extended-duration anticoagulants chosen at investigators' discretion and placebo (one study, 557 participants, low quality evidence) for symptomatic VTE (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.09 to 2.74), symptomatic DVT (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.03 to 3.21), symptomatic PE (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.06 to 16.13), and major bleeding (OR 5.05, 95% CI 0.24 to 105.76). Clinically relevant non-major bleeding and minor bleeding were not reported.We showed no difference between extended-duration VKA and heparin (one study, low quality evidence) for symptomatic VTE (OR 1.64, 95% CI 0.85 to 3.16; 1279 participants), symptomatic DVT (OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.69 to 2.68; 1279 participants), symptomatic PE (OR 9.16, 95% CI 0.49 to 170.42; 1279 participants), major bleeding (OR 3.87, 95% CI 1.91 to 7.85; 1272 participants) and minor bleeding (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.64 to 2.76; 1279 participants). Clinically relevant non-major bleeding was not reported.We showed no difference between extended-duration DOAC and heparin for symptomatic VTE (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.70; 15,977 participants; 5 studies; low quality evidence), symptomatic DVT (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.11 to 3.27; 15,977 participants; 5 studies; low quality evidence), symptomatic PE (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.94; 14,731 participants; 5 studies; moderate quality evidence), major bleeding (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.54; 16,199 participants; 5 studies; high quality evidence), clinically relevant non-major bleeding (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.28; 15,241 participants; 4 studies; high quality evidence) and minor bleeding (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.10; 11,766 participants; 4 studies; high quality evidence). AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Moderate quality evidence suggests extended-duration anticoagulants to prevent VTE should be considered for people undergoing hip replacement surgery, although the benefit should be weighed against the increased risk of minor bleeding. Further studies are needed to better understand the association between VTE and extended-duration oral anticoagulants in relation to knee replacement and hip fracture repair, as well as outcomes such as distal and proximal DVT, reoperation, wound infection and healing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27027384     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004179.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  22 in total

1.  Thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin and direct oral anticoagulants in major orthopedic surgery and acutely ill medical patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claudio Cimminiello; Paolo Prandoni; Giancarlo Agnelli; Giovanni Di Minno; Hernan Polo Friz; Francesco Scaglione; Patrizia Boracchi; Giuseppe Marano; Job Harenberg
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Risk of Pulmonary Embolism More Than 6 Weeks After Surgery Among Cancer-Free Middle-aged Patients.

Authors:  Alexandre Caron; Nicolas Depas; Emmanuel Chazard; Cécile Yelnik; Emmanuelle Jeanpierre; Camille Paris; Jean-Baptiste Beuscart; Grégoire Ficheur
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 3.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after pediatric trauma.

Authors:  Christina Georgeades; Kyle Van Arendonk; David Gourlay
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Can the Caprini score predict thromboembolism and guide pharmacologic prophylaxis after primary joint arthroplasty?

Authors:  Peter A Gold; Terence Y Ng; Josephine R Coury; Luke J Garbarino; Nipun Sodhi; Michael A Mont; Giles R Scuderi
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-07-23

5.  International consensus on the prevention of venous and arterial thrombotic events in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Pablo A Olivera; Stephane Zuily; Paulo G Kotze; Veronique Regnault; Sameer Al Awadhi; Peter Bossuyt; Richard B Gearry; Subrata Ghosh; Taku Kobayashi; Patrick Lacolley; Edouard Louis; Fernando Magro; Siew C Ng; Alfredo Papa; Tim Raine; Fabio V Teixeira; David T Rubin; Silvio Danese; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 46.802

6.  Optimal preoperative timing for prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients over 60 years of age with intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  ZhiQiang Xue; WangJie Tu; JianQing Gao; ZeTao Dong; JianDong Yuan; JunZhe Lang
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in people undergoing major amputation of the lower extremity.

Authors:  David Rb Herlihy; Matthew Thomas; Quoc H Tran; Vikram Puttaswamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-21

8.  Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Anticoagulation Strategies for Postoperative Management of Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients.

Authors:  Savannah R Smith; Jeffrey N Katz; Elena Losina
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 4.794

9.  Novel venous thromboembolic disease (VTED) prophylaxis for total knee arthroplasty-aspirin and fish oil.

Authors:  Peter M Bonutti; Nipun Sodhi; Yatindra H Patel; Assem A Sultan; Anton Khlopas; Morad Chughtai; Frank R Kolisek; Nick Williams; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-12

10.  The compliance of thromboprophylaxis affects the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.

Authors:  Yuan Gao; Anhua Long; Zongyan Xie; Yutong Meng; Jing Tan; Houchen Lv; Licheng Zhang; Lihai Zhang; Peifu Tang
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-08-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.