Carlos Cassiano Denipotti Veronezi1, Priscyla Waleska Targino de Azevedo Simões2, Robson Luiz Dos Santos3, Edroaldo Lummertz da Rocha4, Suelen Meláo5, Merisandra Côrtes de Mattos6, Cristian Cechinel7. 1. Undergraduate Student in Medicine - Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense (UNESC), SC, Brazil. 2. PhD Student in Health Sciences - Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense (UNESC), Master's Degree in Computer Science - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Professor in Medical Informatics at the Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense (UNESC), SC, Brazil. 3. Specialist in Orthopedics and Traumatology- Hospital Regional de São José, Specialist in Surgery of the Hand and Microsurgery at the Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Professor of Orthopedics at the Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense (UNESC), SC, Brazil. 4. Master's Degree in Electrical Engineering - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Bachelor's Degree in Computer Science - Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense (UNESC), SC, Brazil. 5. Undergraduate Student in Medicine - Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense (UNESC). 6. PhD Student in Biomedical Engineering - Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Master's Degree in Computer Science - Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Professor of Artificial Intelligence at the Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense (UNESC), SC, Brazil. 7. PhD Student in Information, Documentation and Knowledge - Universidade de Alcalá (UAH) - Spain; Master's Degree in Computer Sciences - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), SC, Brazil.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the advantages of applying artificial neural networks to recognize patterns on lumbar spine radiographies in order to aid in the process of diagnosing primary osteoarthritis. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional descriptive analytical study with a quantitative approach and an emphasis on diagnosis. The training set was composed of images collected between January and July 2009 from patients who had undergone lateral-view digital radiographies of the lumbar spine, which were provided by a radiology clinic located in the municipality of Criciúma (SC). Out of the total of 260 images gathered, those with distortions, those presenting pathological conditions that altered the architecture of the lumbar spine and those with patterns that were difficult to characterize were discarded, resulting in 206 images. The image data base (n = 206) was then subdivided, resulting in 68 radiographies for the training stage, 68 images for tests and 70 for validation. A hybrid neural network based on Kohonen self-organizing maps and on Multilayer Perceptron networks was used. RESULTS: After 90 cycles, the validation was carried out on the best results, achieving accuracy of 62.85%, sensitivity of 65.71% and specificity of 60%. CONCLUSIONS: Even though the effectiveness shown was moderate, this study is still innovative. The values show that the technique used has a promising future, pointing towards further studies on image and cycle processing methodology with a larger quantity of radiographies.
OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the advantages of applying artificial neural networks to recognize patterns on lumbar spine radiographies in order to aid in the process of diagnosing primary osteoarthritis. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional descriptive analytical study with a quantitative approach and an emphasis on diagnosis. The training set was composed of images collected between January and July 2009 from patients who had undergone lateral-view digital radiographies of the lumbar spine, which were provided by a radiology clinic located in the municipality of Criciúma (SC). Out of the total of 260 images gathered, those with distortions, those presenting pathological conditions that altered the architecture of the lumbar spine and those with patterns that were difficult to characterize were discarded, resulting in 206 images. The image data base (n = 206) was then subdivided, resulting in 68 radiographies for the training stage, 68 images for tests and 70 for validation. A hybrid neural network based on Kohonen self-organizing maps and on Multilayer Perceptron networks was used. RESULTS: After 90 cycles, the validation was carried out on the best results, achieving accuracy of 62.85%, sensitivity of 65.71% and specificity of 60%. CONCLUSIONS: Even though the effectiveness shown was moderate, this study is still innovative. The values show that the technique used has a promising future, pointing towards further studies on image and cycle processing methodology with a larger quantity of radiographies.
Entities:
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence; Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted; Medical Informatics; Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a joint disorder characterized by pain and functional limitations. An X-ray of osteoarthritis reveals osteophytes and narrowing of the joint spaces, and in the histological tests, changes to the integrity of cartilage and subchondral bone can be observed. This is one of the most common diseases affecting the joints, including the lumbar region. It is of great economic importance, in terms of both productivity and cost of treatment1, 2, 3. In the United States, it is the second largest cause of occupational disability in men aged over 50, after coronary heart disease. In Brazil, it accounts for about 18% of the benefits granted by the INSS – the National Institute of Social Security. Although its etiology is not yet clearly understood, some risk factors are already known, such as age, weight and occupation4, 5. Studies suggest further research on treatment, which currently only offers relief of pain and improvement of joint function, but does not enable the pathological process to be reversed6, 7, 8.Therefore, by seeking alternative options for aiding the diagnosis, medical informatics aims to assist doctors in routine diagnoses, and has proven increasingly effective, helping in some clinical tasks, such as warning signs, therapeutic judgments, agents for information retrieval, and image recognition and interpretation, among other models9, 10, 11, 12.Among the areas of application of medical informatics, artificial intelligence (AI) uses artificial neural networks (ANN) to search for a computational model based on biological neurons which, by means of mathematical models, generates an artificial neuron, and through interconnections of various artificial neurons, generates an ANN. Its importance lies in solving problems that are not easily solved by conventional techniques and tools, such as pattern recognition13, 14, 15; problem solving in classification, prediction, approximation, categorization and optimization; character and voice recognition; and predictions of time series11, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19.This study introduces the training, validation and testing of a neural network for the recognition of image patterns of osteophytes of the lumbar spine, in lateral view, in order to assist the diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis of the lumbar spine through imaging techniques.
METHODS
A cross-sectional, descriptive, analytical study was conducted using a quantitative approach, with diagnostic emphasis. The study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee under protocol number 355/2008.The training set consisted of images of patients who underwent digital radiographies of the lumbar spine in lateral view from January 1st to July 1st, 2009, from a radiology service in the municipality of Criciúma (SC). The study consisted of a convenience sample totaling 260 images. Distorted radiographies, pathologies that alter the architecture of the lumbar spine, and patterns that were difficult to characterize were excluded, resulting in 206 images, taken in digital medium in jpg format (so it was not necessary to scan the images). The images were authorized in a term of consent, signed by the person responsible for the company that took the images. The image data base (n = 206) was then subdivided, resulting in 68 radiographies used in the training, 68 in the tests, and 70 in the validation.After collection, the images were processed one by one, as follows: first the contrast was enhanced, and after the use of the first filter, the Euclidean metric was applied. This process was performed for each image. Figure 1 illustrates the results obtained with the use of each filter.
Figure 1
Image processing.
Following this processing, the use of the neural network began; this phase is divided into training, testing and validation. In this phase, an application developed by the Research Group in Applied Computational Intelligence of Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense was used, the interface of which can be seen in Figure 2. This software offers a hybrid neural network based on Kohonen's self-organizing maps* and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) networks.
Figure 2
Application used.
For the training on Kohonen's network, 68 images were used, corresponding to a subregion of 64 × 64 pixels directly selected in the software from the original image; of these, 34 images showed the presence of osteoarthritis and 34 did not. The same image proportions were also used for the testing and validation.The architecture of the Kohonen's network used for the training consisted of 64 neurons in the input layer and a two-dimensional 8 × 8 neuron structure in the Kohonen's layer. The output of this training was then used as input for the trained MLP network, using a backpropagation algorithm, the purpose of which is to classify the resulting map of characteristics as belonging to the group of images with the pattern of osteoarthritis (class 1), or to the group of images without this pattern (class 2).The architecture of the MLP network used for training and classification of these patterns was set to 64 neurons in the input layer, 45 neurons in the intermediate layer and one neuron in the output layer, a learning rate of 0.2 and a momentum of 0.8 with 500 iterations. The structure of the Kohonen's network had an initial learning rate of 0.2 and neighborhood size of 20, decremented by 20 and final neighborhood size of 0.10 with 300 iterations.In the statistical analysis, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and accuracy of the ANN validation were calculated using the application Microsoft Excel® 2002.
RESULTS
The image data base consisted of 206 images that comprised the set used for the training, testing and validation. For the final ANN result, 90 cycles were performed in the training; the validation was performed using the test of greatest accuracy, which was of 62.85%, with a standard deviation of 4.04, and the neural network parameters cited in the methodology.Figure 3 illustrates the variation in accuracy in the top 30 tests.
Figure 3
Variation in accuracy.
In a comparison between the test of greatest accuracy and the validation, an increase was observed in the number of accurate validations (Figure 4).
Figure 4
Comparison between test and validation of neural network.
ANN sensitivity was 65.71% and specificity 60%; positive predictive value was 62.16% and negative predictive value 63.63%. The calculations showed a positive likelihood ratio of 1.62 and a negative likelihood ratio of 1.72.
DISCUSSION
Imaging is very important for the diagnosis of osteoarthritis, conventional radiographies being a simple, inexpensive and well-suited method for the identification of that disease, enabling the extent and severity of the disease to be determined, and its progression to be monitored. For this article, studies on neural networks from various medical applications were used, including studies using electroencephalograms (EEG); surgical planning; and x-rays of the chest, breast and others.The accuracy demonstrated by the ANN in this study was 62.85%, which is below the average found in the literature (around 85%)16, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25. An example is the study carried on in São Luiz (MA), in 2009, on the surgical planning of strabismus, which had an accuracy of 83%. This result may be due to the characterization of the images since, because they are digital radiographies, a wide variation can be found in their patterns.Sensitivity (65.71%) and specificity (60%) were also lower compared to previous ANN studies, as in the study carried on at the Universidade Federal do Paraná in 2009, which showed an average sensitivity and specificity of 90% in EEG patterns. The high false-positive rate (14) and false-negative rate (12) can be explained by the limited number of images used for the network training (n = 68), even though some studies present higher accuracy with the same number of images.PPV and NPV were 62.16% and 63.63%, respectively, with values lower than those of literature, which resulted in an average of 90% in these calculations.The likelihood ratio evaluates the quality of a diagnostic test; however, no studies addressing this calculation for pattern recognition in images using artificial neural networks have been found to date. The present study shows an PLR of 1.62, which means that the positive result obtained for the network is 1.62 times more likely to be actually positive compared with the negative cases.
CONCLUSIONS
This article addresses the use of a support system for the diagnosis of osteoarthritis of the lumbar spine, based on images from digital radiographies of the lumbar spine in lateral view. Sensitivity and specificity were around 63%. Therefore further tests with a larger amount of images of patients with or without OA should be performed, and the methodology used in image processing should be improved, aiming to obtain greater accuracy of the system. Although the neural network presented an average efficacy, because this was an innovative study, its results show a potential for the use of computer-based artificial neural networks to assist and support practitioners.It should be highlighted that the use of computers to assist in the analysis of x-ray images has proven effective for diagnosis in different medical specialties, therefore high accuracy is not initially required but rather, a performance closer to that of experts, to support them, not to replace them, seeking also to help in the process of medical education.
Authors: Stephen R Pye; David M Reid; Mark Lunt; Judith E Adams; Alan J Silman; Terence W O'Neill Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2006-10-06 Impact factor: 19.103