Anton R Kiselev1, Sergey V Balashov2, Olga M Posnenkova1, Mikhail D Prokhorov3, Vladimir I Gridnev1. 1. Department of New Cardiological Informational Technologies, Research Institute of Cardiology, Saratov State Medical University n.a. V.I. Razumovsky, Saratov, Russia. 2. Center of Medical and Social Rehabilitation of Medical Unit no.64 of Russian Federal Penitentiary Service, Saratov, Russia. 3. Saratov Branch of the Institute of Radio Engineering and Electronics of Russian Academy of Sciences, Saratov, Russia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare different methods of health status assessment in organized cohort of penitentiary employees in Saratov Region, Russian Federation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 1,014 penitentiary employees (81.8% male) aged 33.4±6.8 years were included in the cohort study. All participants underwent an annual preventive health examination in the Center of Medical and Social Rehabilitation of Russian Federal Penitentiary Service in Saratov Region. The prevalence of common cardiovascular risk factors was assessed. Risk Score and the number of fulfilled health metrics proposed by American Heart Association (AHA) were calculated for each participant. RESULTS: It is shown that penitentiary staff in Saratov Region is characterized by low current risk score (1.2±0.8%), but high prevalence of such risk factors as increased body weight and obesity (51%), tobacco use or passive smoking (81%), and unhealthy diet (55%). 98.4% of participants had the Score level of ≤5%, but only 4.5% of penitentiary staff met the ideal cardiovascular health (they met all seven AHA health metrics). One fifth of the participants met three or less AHA health metrics. A statistically significant correlation between the risk Score and the number of fulfilled AHA health metrics is revealed (Chi-square = 5.1, p=0.024). The probability of fulfilment of less than 5 AHA health metrics in subjects with medium risk score is shown to be almost twofold greater than in subjects with low risk Score. However, there are a lot of differences in the assessment of cardiovascular health by risk Score and AHA health metrics. CONCLUSION: AHA health metrics are more preferable than the risk Score or assessment of separate cardiovascular risk factors for preventive management in organized cohorts with low current cardiovascular risk such as penitentiary staff in Saratov Region.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare different methods of health status assessment in organized cohort of penitentiary employees in Saratov Region, Russian Federation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 1,014 penitentiary employees (81.8% male) aged 33.4±6.8 years were included in the cohort study. All participants underwent an annual preventive health examination in the Center of Medical and Social Rehabilitation of Russian Federal Penitentiary Service in Saratov Region. The prevalence of common cardiovascular risk factors was assessed. Risk Score and the number of fulfilled health metrics proposed by American Heart Association (AHA) were calculated for each participant. RESULTS: It is shown that penitentiary staff in Saratov Region is characterized by low current risk score (1.2±0.8%), but high prevalence of such risk factors as increased body weight and obesity (51%), tobacco use or passive smoking (81%), and unhealthy diet (55%). 98.4% of participants had the Score level of ≤5%, but only 4.5% of penitentiary staff met the ideal cardiovascular health (they met all seven AHA health metrics). One fifth of the participants met three or less AHA health metrics. A statistically significant correlation between the risk Score and the number of fulfilled AHA health metrics is revealed (Chi-square = 5.1, p=0.024). The probability of fulfilment of less than 5 AHA health metrics in subjects with medium risk score is shown to be almost twofold greater than in subjects with low risk Score. However, there are a lot of differences in the assessment of cardiovascular health by risk Score and AHA health metrics. CONCLUSION: AHA health metrics are more preferable than the risk Score or assessment of separate cardiovascular risk factors for preventive management in organized cohorts with low current cardiovascular risk such as penitentiary staff in Saratov Region.
Entities:
Keywords:
Risk factors; cardiovascular risk; health metrics; penitentiary service
Authors: Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Yuling Hong; Darwin Labarthe; Dariush Mozaffarian; Lawrence J Appel; Linda Van Horn; Kurt Greenlund; Stephen Daniels; Graham Nichol; Gordon F Tomaselli; Donna K Arnett; Gregg C Fonarow; P Michael Ho; Michael S Lauer; Frederick A Masoudi; Rose Marie Robertson; Véronique Roger; Lee H Schwamm; Paul Sorlie; Clyde W Yancy; Wayne D Rosamond Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-01-20 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Lori Mosca; Allison H Linfante; Emelia J Benjamin; Kathy Berra; Sharonne N Hayes; Brian W Walsh; Rosalind P Fabunmi; Johnny Kwan; Thomas Mills; Susan Lee Simpson Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-02-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Bradley J Willcox; Qimei He; Randi Chen; Katsuhiko Yano; Kamal H Masaki; John S Grove; Timothy A Donlon; D Craig Willcox; J David Curb Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-11-15 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Rita F Redberg; Emelia J Benjamin; Vera Bittner; Lynne T Braun; David C Goff; Stephen Havas; Darwin R Labarthe; Marian C Limacher; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Samia Mora; Thomas A Pearson; Martha J Radford; Gerald W Smetana; John A Spertus; Erica W Swegler Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-09-29 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella Journal: Hypertension Date: 2003-12-01 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Honorio Silva; Rafael Hernandez-Hernandez; Raul Vinueza; Manuel Velasco; Carlos Pablo Boissonnet; Jorge Escobedo; H Elif Silva; Palmira Pramparo; Elinor Wilson Journal: Am J Ther Date: 2010 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.688
Authors: Jacqueline I Kim; Arthur Sillah; Jackie L Boucher; Abbey C Sidebottom; Thomas Knickelbine Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2013-04-25 Impact factor: 5.501