Hayri Elicabuk1, Serpil Yaylacı2, Atakan Yilmaz1, Celile Hatipoglu3, F Gokhan Kaya4, Mustafa Serinken1. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Pamukkale University School of Medicine, Denizli, Turkey. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Acıbadem University Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey. 3. Rize Provincial Directorate of Public Health, Rize, Turkey. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In this study, the reliability of Turkish cardiac massage and Basic Life Support (BLS) videos, which have already been downloaded from three website such as YouTube, Google, Yahoo following the publication of 2010 cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guideline and their suitability to the same guideline were researched. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The videos uploaded to the three web-site to search videos on internet were queried by using the keywords "cardiac massage" and "basic life support". Videos that had been uploaded between January 2011 and July 2014 were analyzed and scored by two experienced emergency specialists. RESULTS: A total of 1126 videos were obtained. 1029 of the videos (91.4%) were excluded by researchers. 97 videos were detected to accord with study criteria. Despite most of the videos were found on Google website by keywords, the enormous part of videos proper to criteria were sourced from YouTube website (n=65, 67.0%). One fourth of the videos (24.7%) were observed to not be suitable for 2010 CPR guideline. AED usage was mentioned slightly in the videos (14.4%). Median score of the videos is 5 (IQR: 4-6). The rate and scores of the videos uploaded by official institution or association were significantly higher than others (p=0.007 and 0.006, respectively). Moreover, scores of the videos compatible with guidelines uploaded by official institution or association and medical personal were also found higher (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Eventually, all the data obtained in this study support that Turkish videos were not reliable on the subject of BLS and cardiac massage. It is promising that videos with high follow-up rates also have been scored higher.
OBJECTIVE: In this study, the reliability of Turkish cardiac massage and Basic Life Support (BLS) videos, which have already been downloaded from three website such as YouTube, Google, Yahoo following the publication of 2010 cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guideline and their suitability to the same guideline were researched. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The videos uploaded to the three web-site to search videos on internet were queried by using the keywords "cardiac massage" and "basic life support". Videos that had been uploaded between January 2011 and July 2014 were analyzed and scored by two experienced emergency specialists. RESULTS: A total of 1126 videos were obtained. 1029 of the videos (91.4%) were excluded by researchers. 97 videos were detected to accord with study criteria. Despite most of the videos were found on Google website by keywords, the enormous part of videos proper to criteria were sourced from YouTube website (n=65, 67.0%). One fourth of the videos (24.7%) were observed to not be suitable for 2010 CPR guideline. AED usage was mentioned slightly in the videos (14.4%). Median score of the videos is 5 (IQR: 4-6). The rate and scores of the videos uploaded by official institution or association were significantly higher than others (p=0.007 and 0.006, respectively). Moreover, scores of the videos compatible with guidelines uploaded by official institution or association and medical personal were also found higher (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Eventually, all the data obtained in this study support that Turkish videos were not reliable on the subject of BLS and cardiac massage. It is promising that videos with high follow-up rates also have been scored higher.
Authors: John M Field; Mary Fran Hazinski; Michael R Sayre; Leon Chameides; Stephen M Schexnayder; Robin Hemphill; Ricardo A Samson; John Kattwinkel; Robert A Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Diana M Cave; Edward C Jauch; Peter J Kudenchuk; Robert W Neumar; Mary Ann Peberdy; Jeffrey M Perlman; Elizabeth Sinz; Andrew H Travers; Marc D Berg; John E Billi; Brian Eigel; Robert W Hickey; Monica E Kleinman; Mark S Link; Laurie J Morrison; Robert E O'Connor; Michael Shuster; Clifton W Callaway; Brett Cucchiara; Jeffrey D Ferguson; Thomas D Rea; Terry L Vanden Hoek Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Burak Katipoğlu; İlker Akbaş; Abdullah Osman Koçak; Muhammet Furkan Erbay; Engin İhsan Turan; Kamber Kasali Journal: Emerg Med Int Date: 2019-05-02 Impact factor: 1.112
Authors: J Sterz; P R Tückmantel; L Bepler; M C Stefanescu; Y Gramlich; A Flinspach; M Rüsseler Journal: Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 1.552