Literature DB >> 27026243

Cranial fixation plates in cerebral magnetic resonance imaging: a 3 and 7 Tesla in vivo image quality study.

Bixia Chen1,2, Tobias Schoemberg3,4, Oliver Kraff3, Philipp Dammann3,4, Andreas K Bitz3,5, Marc Schlamann6,7, Harald H Quick3,8, Mark E Ladd3,5, Ulrich Sure4, Karsten H Wrede3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses and quantifies impairment of postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 7 Tesla (T) after implantation of titanium cranial fixation plates (CFPs) for neurosurgical bone flap fixation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group comprised five patients who were intra-individually examined with 3 and 7 T MRI preoperatively and postoperatively (within 72 h/3 months) after implantation of CFPs. Acquired sequences included T1-weighted magnetization-prepared rapid-acquisition gradient-echo (MPRAGE), T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo (TSE) imaging, and susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI). Two experienced neurosurgeons and a neuroradiologist rated image quality and the presence of artifacts in consensus reading.
RESULTS: Minor artifacts occurred around the CFPs in MPRAGE and T2 TSE at both field strengths, with no significant differences between 3 and 7 T. In SWI, artifacts were accentuated in the early postoperative scans at both field strengths due to intracranial air and hemorrhagic remnants. After resorption, the brain tissue directly adjacent to skull bone could still be assessed. Image quality after 3 months was equal to the preoperative examinations at 3 and 7 T.
CONCLUSION: Image quality after CFP implantation was not significantly impaired in 7 T MRI, and artifacts were comparable to those in 3 T MRI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  7 Tesla; Craniotomy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Postoperative; Titanium cranial fixation plates

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27026243     DOI: 10.1007/s10334-016-0548-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  21 in total

1.  Caudal image contrast inversion in MPRAGE at 7 Tesla: problem and solution.

Authors:  Karsten H Wrede; Sören Johst; Philipp Dammann; Lale Umutlu; Marc U Schlamann; Ibrahim E Sandalcioglu; Ulrich Sure; Mark E Ladd; Stefan Maderwald
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Evaluation of 39 medical implants at 7.0 T.

Authors:  David X Feng; Joseph P McCauley; Fea K Morgan-Curtis; Redoan A Salam; David R Pennell; Mary E Loveless; Adrienne N Dula
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Fast 3D radiofrequency field mapping using echo-planar imaging.

Authors:  F Jiru; U Klose
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Non-Enhanced MR Imaging of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations at 7 Tesla.

Authors:  Karsten H Wrede; Philipp Dammann; Sören Johst; Christoph Mönninghoff; Marc Schlamann; Stefan Maderwald; I Erol Sandalcioglu; Mark E Ladd; Michael Forsting; Ulrich Sure; Lale Umutlu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Longitudinal brain imaging of five malignant glioma patients treated with bevacizumab using susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 7 T.

Authors:  Günther Grabner; Iris Nöbauer; Katarzyna Elandt; Claudia Kronnerwetter; Adelheid Woehrer; Christine Marosi; Daniela Prayer; Siegfried Trattnig; Matthias Preusser
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 6.  MRI at 7 Tesla and above: demonstrated and potential capabilities.

Authors:  Oliver Kraff; Anja Fischer; Armin M Nagel; Christoph Mönninghoff; Mark E Ladd
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 7.  Advanced magnetic resonance imaging of the physical processes in human glioblastoma.

Authors:  Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Kyrre E Emblem; Ovidiu Andronesi; Bruce Rosen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Perspectives of 3 T magnetic resonance imaging in radiosurgical treatment planning.

Authors:  Patrik Zamecnik; Marco Essig
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2013

9.  Three-dimensional susceptibility-weighted imaging at 7 T using fractal-based quantitative analysis to grade gliomas.

Authors:  Antonio Di Ieva; Sabine Göd; Günther Grabner; Fabio Grizzi; Camillo Sherif; Christian Matula; Manfred Tschabitscher; Siegfrid Trattnig
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  MR safety assessment of potential RF heating from cranial fixation plates at 7 T.

Authors:  Oliver Kraff; Karsten H Wrede; Tobias Schoemberg; Philipp Dammann; Yacine Noureddine; Stephan Orzada; Mark E Ladd; Andreas K Bitz
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  [Safety of implants in high field and ultrahigh field MRI].

Authors:  O Kraff; H H Quick
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  From ultrahigh to extreme field magnetic resonance: where physics, biology and medicine meet.

Authors:  Thoralf Niendorf; Markus Barth; Frank Kober; Siegfried Trattnig
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 3.  Application of 7T MRS to High-Grade Gliomas.

Authors:  L McCarthy; G Verma; G Hangel; A Neal; B A Moffat; J P Stockmann; O C Andronesi; P Balchandani; C G Hadjipanayis
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.966

4.  Development and evaluation of a numerical simulation approach to predict metal artifacts from passive implants in MRI.

Authors:  Tobias Spronk; Oliver Kraff; Jakob Kreutner; Gregor Schaefers; Harald H Quick
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 2.533

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.