Literature DB >> 27026199

Development and Validation of Urine-based Peptide Biomarker Panels for Detecting Bladder Cancer in a Multi-center Study.

Maria Frantzi1, Kim E van Kessel2, Ellen C Zwarthoff2, Mirari Marquez3, Marta Rava3, Núria Malats3, Axel S Merseburger4, Ioannis Katafigiotis5, Konstantinos Stravodimos5, William Mullen6, Jerome Zoidakis7, Manousos Makridakis7, Martin Pejchinovski8, Elena Critselis7, Ralph Lichtinghagen9, Korbinian Brand9, Mohammed Dakna8, Maria G Roubelakis10, Dan Theodorescu11, Antonia Vlahou7, Harald Mischak12, Nicholas P Anagnou13.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Urothelial bladder cancer presents high recurrence rates, mandating continuous monitoring via invasive cystoscopy. The development of noninvasive tests for disease diagnosis and surveillance remains an unmet clinical need. In this study, validation of two urine-based biomarker panels for detecting primary and recurrent urothelial bladder cancer was conducted. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Two studies (total n = 1,357) were performed for detecting primary (n = 721) and relapsed urothelial bladder cancer (n = 636). Cystoscopy was applied for detecting urothelial bladder cancer, while patients negative for recurrence had follow-up for at least one year to exclude presence of an undetected tumor at the time of sampling. Capillary electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry (CE-MS) was employed for the identification of urinary peptide biomarkers. The candidate urine-based peptide biomarker panels were derived from nested cross-sectional studies in primary (n = 451) and recurrent (n = 425) urothelial bladder cancer.
RESULTS: Two biomarker panels were developed on the basis of 116 and 106 peptide biomarkers using support vector machine algorithms. Validation of the urine-based biomarker panels in independent validation sets, resulted in AUC values of 0.87 and 0.75 for detecting primary (n = 270) and recurrent urothelial bladder cancer (n = 211), respectively. At the optimal threshold, the classifier for detecting primary urothelial bladder cancer exhibited 91% sensitivity and 68% specificity, while the classifier for recurrence demonstrated 87% sensitivity and 51% specificity. Particularly for patients undergoing surveillance, improved performance was achieved when combining the urine-based panel with cytology (AUC = 0.87).
CONCLUSIONS: The developed urine-based peptide biomarker panel for detecting primary urothelial bladder cancer exhibits good performance. Combination of the urine-based panel and cytology resulted in improved performance for detecting disease recurrence. Clin Cancer Res; 22(16); 4077-86. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27026199     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  36 in total

1.  Bladder cancer: Noninvasive diagnosis and detection of recurrence.

Authors:  Clemens Thoma
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Current applications of capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry for the analysis of biologically important analytes in urine (2017 to mid-2021): A review.

Authors:  Hrušková Helena; Voráčová Ivona; Řemínek Roman; Foret František
Journal:  J Sep Sci       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 3.614

3.  Spectrophotometric photodynamic detection involving extracorporeal treatment with hexaminolevulinate for bladder cancer cells in voided urine.

Authors:  Yasushi Nakai; Toshiyuki Ozawa; Fumiko Mizuno; Sayuri Onishi; Takuya Owari; Syunta Hori; Yosuke Morizawa; Yosihiro Tatsumi; Makito Miyake; Nobumichi Tanaka; Daisuke Tsuruta; Kiyohide Fujimoto
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Profilin choreographs actin and microtubules in cells and cancer.

Authors:  Morgan L Pimm; Jessica Hotaling; Jessica L Henty-Ridilla
Journal:  Int Rev Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 6.813

Review 5.  Development of biomarkers of genitourinary cancer using mass spectrometry-based clinical proteomics.

Authors:  Yi-Ting Chen; Cheng-Han Tsai; Chien-Lun Chen; Jau-Song Yu; Ying-Hsu Chang
Journal:  J Food Drug Anal       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 6.157

6.  UroMark-a urinary biomarker assay for the detection of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Andrew Feber; Pawan Dhami; Liqin Dong; Patricia de Winter; Wei Shen Tan; Mónica Martínez-Fernández; Dirk S Paul; Antony Hynes-Allen; Sheida Rezaee; Pratik Gurung; Simon Rodney; Ahmed Mehmood; Felipe Villacampa; Federico de la Rosa; Charles Jameson; Kar Keung Cheng; Maurice P Zeegers; Richard T Bryan; Nicholas D James; Jesus M Paramio; Alex Freeman; Stephan Beck; John D Kelly
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 6.551

Review 7.  Ten Years of Proteomics in Bladder Cancer: Progress and Future Directions.

Authors:  Maria Frantzi; Antonia Vlahou
Journal:  Bladder Cancer       Date:  2017-01-27

8.  Meta-analysis of a 10-plex urine-based biomarker assay for the detection of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Norihiko Masuda; Osamu Ogawa; Meyeon Park; Alvin Y Liu; Steve Goodison; Yunfeng Dai; Landon Kozai; Hideki Furuya; Yair Lotan; Charles J Rosser; Takashi Kobayashi
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-01-03

9.  Proteomics analysis of bladder cancer invasion: Targeting EIF3D for therapeutic intervention.

Authors:  Agnieszka Latosinska; Marika Mokou; Manousos Makridakis; William Mullen; Jerome Zoidakis; Vasiliki Lygirou; Maria Frantzi; Ioannis Katafigiotis; Konstantinos Stravodimos; Marie C Hupe; Maciej Dobrzynski; Walter Kolch; Axel S Merseburger; Harald Mischak; Maria G Roubelakis; Antonia Vlahou
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-20

10.  Reliability of plasma polar metabolite concentrations in a large-scale cohort study using capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Sei Harada; Akiyoshi Hirayama; Queenie Chan; Ayako Kurihara; Kota Fukai; Miho Iida; Suzuka Kato; Daisuke Sugiyama; Kazuyo Kuwabara; Ayano Takeuchi; Miki Akiyama; Tomonori Okamura; Timothy M D Ebbels; Paul Elliott; Masaru Tomita; Asako Sato; Chizuru Suzuki; Masahiro Sugimoto; Tomoyoshi Soga; Toru Takebayashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.