Literature DB >> 27025594

Feasibility of an interactive electronic self-report tool for oral cancer therapy in an outpatient setting.

Marika Rasschaert1, Silke Helsen2, Christian Rolfo3, Ilse Van Brussel4, Jo Ravelingien4, Marc Peeters3,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The introduction of oral anti-cancer agents provides a convenient administration route for chronic cancer treatment to outpatients. Health information technology through web-based applications or other electronic tools can offer a platform to improve treatment compliance, symptom management, and patient-provider communication.
PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to test the feasibility and clinical utility of an electronic self-report device (RemeCoach) for patients or their caregivers and to register and prospectively evaluate the quality of data generated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients using Teysuno® (S-1) for advanced gastrointestinal carcinoma used a pre-programmed device in order to register compliance to treatment and six clinical parameters. Real-time data were collected onto a central platform, which processed the data by an algorithm. This algorithm stratified the data into different grades based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0).
RESULTS: From December 2013 to March 2014, 11 patients (5 men, 6 women) were enrolled. Compliance to the device was high, six patients (55 %) registered timely intake of medication (demonstrating >95 % treatment compliance). Agreement between patients' and clinicians' reported toxicity was substantial for nausea, but discrepant for fatigue, hand-foot syndrome, and mucositis.
CONCLUSION: The use of an interactive self-report tool is feasible, reliable, and acceptable to outpatients. The RemeCoach and the algorithm devised will be further developed as an interactive patient-reported outcome (PRO) system, to improve early detection of side effects in an outpatient setting. Further studies are needed to confirm these data and to explore the relationship between optimal patient support and efficacy of treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic care model; Oral anti-cancer agents; Patient-reported outcome (PRO); Self-report

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27025594     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3186-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  17 in total

1.  Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness.

Authors:  Thomas Bodenheimer; Edward H Wagner; Kevin Grumbach
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-10-09       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Symptomatic toxicities experienced during anticancer treatment: agreement between patient and physician reporting in three randomized trials.

Authors:  Massimo Di Maio; Ciro Gallo; Natasha B Leighl; Maria Carmela Piccirillo; Gennaro Daniele; Francesco Nuzzo; Cesare Gridelli; Vittorio Gebbia; Fortunato Ciardiello; Sabino De Placido; Anna Ceribelli; Adolfo G Favaretto; Andrea de Matteis; Ronald Feld; Charles Butts; Jane Bryce; Simona Signoriello; Alessandro Morabito; Gaetano Rocco; Francesco Perrone
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Neil K Aaronson; Ali K Choucair; Thomas E Elliott; Joanne Greenhalgh; Michele Y Halyard; Rachel Hess; Deborah M Miller; Bryce B Reeve; Maria Santana
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Development of a novel form of an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative (S-1) directed to the potentiation of the tumor selective cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil by two biochemical modulators.

Authors:  T Shirasaka; Y Shimamato; H Ohshimo; M Yamaguchi; T Kato; K Yonekura; M Fukushima
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.248

5.  Multicenter phase III comparison of cisplatin/S-1 with cisplatin/infusional fluorouracil in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma study: the FLAGS trial.

Authors:  Jaffer A Ajani; Wuilbert Rodriguez; Gyorgy Bodoky; Vladimir Moiseyenko; Mikhail Lichinitser; Vera Gorbunova; Ihor Vynnychenko; August Garin; Istvan Lang; Silvia Falcon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors.

Authors:  D Howell; S Molloy; K Wilkinson; E Green; K Orchard; K Wang; J Liberty
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 7.  Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology.

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Amy P Abernethy; C Daniel Mullins; Bryce B Reeve; Mary Lou Smith; Stephen Joel Coons; Jeff Sloan; Keith Wenzel; Cynthia Chauhan; Wayland Eppard; Elizabeth S Frank; Joseph Lipscomb; Stephen A Raymond; Merianne Spencer; Sean Tunis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Adverse symptom event reporting by patients vs clinicians: relationships with clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Xiaoyu Jia; Glenn Heller; Allison Barz; Laura Sit; Michael Fruscione; Mark Appawu; Alexia Iasonos; Thomas Atkinson; Shari Goldfarb; Ann Culkin; Mark G Kris; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 9.  Recommended patient-reported core set of symptoms to measure in adult cancer treatment trials.

Authors:  Bryce B Reeve; Sandra A Mitchell; Amylou C Dueck; Ethan Basch; David Cella; Carolyn Miller Reilly; Lori M Minasian; Andrea M Denicoff; Ann M O'Mara; Michael J Fisch; Cynthia Chauhan; Neil K Aaronson; Corneel Coens; Deborah Watkins Bruner
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Collection of patient-reported outcomes;--text messages on mobile phones provide valid scores and high response rates.

Authors:  Anne Christie; Hanne Dagfinrud; Øystein Dale; Trenton Schulz; Kåre Birger Hagen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prescreening for COVID-19 in patients receiving cancer treatment using a patient-reported outcome platform.

Authors:  Marc Peeters; Peter van Dam; Marika Anna Rasschaert; Christof Vulsteke; Sven De Keersmaecker; Lieselot Croes; Ilse Van Brussel; Jo Ravelingien; Annelies Janssens; Hans Prenen
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2020-06

2.  Electronic Systems for Patients to Report and Manage Side Effects of Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lorraine Warrington; Kate Absolom; Mark Conner; Ian Kellar; Beverly Clayton; Michael Ayres; Galina Velikova
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 3.  The Extent of Engagement With Telehealth Approaches by Patients With Advanced Cancer: Systematic Review.

Authors:  William Goodman; Anne-Marie Bagnall; Laura Ashley; Desiree Azizoddin; Felix Muehlensiepen; David Blum; Michael I Bennett; Matthew Allsop
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2022-02-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.