Literature DB >> 27025548

Bacterial and fungal contamination risks in human oocyte and embryo cryopreservation: open versus closed vitrification systems.

Inmaculada Molina1, Miquel Mari1, Juan Vicente Martínez1, Edurne Novella-Maestre2, Nuria Pellicer3, Javier Pemán4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the contamination risk in open and closed vitrification devices for oocyte/embryo cryopreservation by evaluating the contaminants present (bacteria and fungi) in the thaw medium and in liquid nitrogen (LN) storage containers.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Human reproduction unit. PATIENT(S): None. INTERVENTION(S): Retrospective study of vitrification device safety and LN sterility performed from July to October 2014. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): From each bank container, both open and closed vitrification devices, devitrification media and LN in the containers and as supplied by the company were evaluated for contaminants. An automated system and the corresponding susceptibility to antibiotics were used for bacteria identification. Fungus detection was performed by evaluating the colony morphology and their microscopic characteristics. RESULT(S): No bacteria or fungi were observed in any of the devitrification media regardless of the type of device used, nor in the LN supplied by the company. No fungi were observed in any of the LN samples tested. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Bacillus spp. were found in all oocyte/embryo bank LN containers. There was no relationship between the number of samples or the time that each container had been used and the presence of microbiologic contaminants in the LN. At the container's bottom, Acinetobacter lwoffii, Alcaligenes faecalis ssp. faecalis, and Sphingomonas paucimobilis were found. CONCLUSION(S): Bacteria cross-contamination may not occur in oocyte/embryo banking in either open or closed storage devices. However, microorganisms can survive in LN. The bacteria cross-contamination risk is no greater for open than for closed containers. Storage containers should be cleaned periodically owing to the risk of lost straws or small particles of contaminated material.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cross-contamination; bacteria; fungi; liquid nitrogen; open and closed devices; vitrification systems

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27025548     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  6 in total

Review 1.  Vitrification of human immature oocytes before and after in vitro maturation: a review.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Khalili; Abbas Shahedi; Sareh Ashourzadeh; Stefania Annarita Nottola; Guido Macchiarelli; Maria Grazia Palmerini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  An antibacterial and biocompatible piperazine polymer.

Authors:  Maolan Zhang; Guoming Zeng; Xiaoling Liao; Yuanliang Wang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.036

3.  Open versus closed vitrification system of human oocytes and embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis of embryologic and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Hongcai Cai; Jean Damascene Niringiyumukiza; Yamin Li; Qiaohong Lai; Yinzhao Jia; Ping Su; Wenpei Xiang
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 4.  Microbial occurrence in liquid nitrogen storage tanks: a challenge for cryobanking?

Authors:  Felizitas Bajerski; Manuela Nagel; Joerg Overmann
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  Human sperm vitrification: the state of the art.

Authors:  Yong Tao; Erika Sanger; Arpornrad Saewu; Marie-Claude Leveille
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 6.  Recent advances in oncofertility care worldwide and in Japan.

Authors:  Yasushi Takai
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2018-06-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.