Talha Shaikh1, Thomas M Churilla1, Pooja Monpara1, Walter J Scott2, Steven J Cohen3, Joshua E Meyer4. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 2. Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 3. Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: Joshua.Meyer@fccc.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: There are limited data regarding clinical and treatment factors associated with radiation pneumonitis (RP) in patients receiving taxane-based trimodality therapy for esophageal cancer. The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of RP in patients undergoing trimodality therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy between 2006 and 2011. The association between clinical and dosimetric factors with RP was assessed using χ2 test and Mann-Whitney U test. Multivariable regression was used to assess the relationship between grade 2+ RP and clinical/dosimetric factors. Receiver operator curves were generated to identify threshold doses for RP. RESULTS: A total of 139 patients were included; 19 (13.7%) patients experienced grade 2+ RP. Patients with upper/middle thoracic tumors (P = .038) and receiving higher radiation doses (P = .038) were more likely to develop grade 2+ RP. There was no association between taxane-based therapy and grade 2+ RP (P = .728). The percent volume of lung receiving 5 Gy (V5; P < .001), 10 Gy (P < .001), 20 Gy (V20; P < .001), and 30 Gy (P < .001) was associated with an increased risk of grade 2+ RP. On multivariable regression, the lung V5 (odds ratio, 1.101; 95% confidence interval, 1.1014-1.195) and V20 (odds ratio, 1.149; 95% confidence interval, 1.1015-1.301) remained associated with grade 2+ RP. A V5 ≤65% and V20 ≤25% were identified as optimal thresholds for increased grade 2+ RP. CONCLUSIONS: Dosimetric parameters are strong predictors of symptomatic RP in patients undergoing trimodality therapy for esophageal cancer. Mitigating the risk of RP in these patients should be an important consideration during treatment planning.
PURPOSE: There are limited data regarding clinical and treatment factors associated with radiation pneumonitis (RP) in patients receiving taxane-based trimodality therapy for esophageal cancer. The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of RP in patients undergoing trimodality therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy between 2006 and 2011. The association between clinical and dosimetric factors with RP was assessed using χ2 test and Mann-Whitney U test. Multivariable regression was used to assess the relationship between grade 2+ RP and clinical/dosimetric factors. Receiver operator curves were generated to identify threshold doses for RP. RESULTS: A total of 139 patients were included; 19 (13.7%) patients experienced grade 2+ RP. Patients with upper/middle thoracic tumors (P = .038) and receiving higher radiation doses (P = .038) were more likely to develop grade 2+ RP. There was no association between taxane-based therapy and grade 2+ RP (P = .728). The percent volume of lung receiving 5 Gy (V5; P < .001), 10 Gy (P < .001), 20 Gy (V20; P < .001), and 30 Gy (P < .001) was associated with an increased risk of grade 2+ RP. On multivariable regression, the lung V5 (odds ratio, 1.101; 95% confidence interval, 1.1014-1.195) and V20 (odds ratio, 1.149; 95% confidence interval, 1.1015-1.301) remained associated with grade 2+ RP. A V5 ≤65% and V20 ≤25% were identified as optimal thresholds for increased grade 2+ RP. CONCLUSIONS: Dosimetric parameters are strong predictors of symptomatic RP in patients undergoing trimodality therapy for esophageal cancer. Mitigating the risk of RP in these patients should be an important consideration during treatment planning.
Authors: Bhupesh Parashar; Alison Edwards; Rajeev Mehta; Mark Pasmantier; A Gabriella Wernicke; Albert Sabbas; Roger S Kerestez; Dattatreyudu Nori; K S Clifford Chao Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Lawrence B Marks; Soren M Bentzen; Joseph O Deasy; Feng-Ming Spring Kong; Jeffrey D Bradley; Ivan S Vogelius; Issam El Naqa; Jessica L Hubbs; Joos V Lebesque; Robert D Timmerman; Mary K Martel; Andrew Jackson Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: K Hayashi; Y Fujiwara; M Nomura; M Kamata; H Kojima; M Kohzai; K Sumita; N Tanigawa Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2014-11-27 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: J F Bosset; M Gignoux; J P Triboulet; E Tiret; G Mantion; D Elias; P Lozach; J C Ollier; J J Pavy; M Mercier; T Sahmoud Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1997-07-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David A Palma; Suresh Senan; Kayoko Tsujino; Robert B Barriger; Ramesh Rengan; Marta Moreno; Jeffrey D Bradley; Tae Hyun Kim; Sara Ramella; Lawrence B Marks; Luigi De Petris; Larry Stitt; George Rodrigues Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-06-09 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Bryan H Burmeister; B Mark Smithers; Val Gebski; Lara Fitzgerald; R John Simes; Peter Devitt; Stephen Ackland; David C Gotley; David Joseph; Jeremy Millar; John North; Euan T Walpole; James W Denham Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: M V Graham; J A Purdy; B Emami; W Harms; W Bosch; M A Lockett; C A Perez Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1999-09-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Annemarie F Shepherd; Michelle Iocolano; Jonathan Leeman; Brandon S Imber; Aaron T Wild; Michael Offin; Jamie E Chaft; James Huang; Andreas Rimner; Abraham J Wu; Daphna Y Gelblum; Narek Shaverdian; Charles B Simone; Daniel R Gomez; Ellen D Yorke; Andrew Jackson Journal: Pract Radiat Oncol Date: 2020-10-14
Authors: Wei Song; Hong Lu; Jie Liu; Di Zhao; Jun Ma; Biyun Zhang; Dahai Yu; Xinchen Sun; Jinkai Li Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2019-08-28 Impact factor: 2.102