Literature DB >> 2702442

Anastomotic leakage: an avoidable complication of Lewis-Tanner oesophagectomy.

I M Paterson1, J Wong.   

Abstract

Data were collected prospectively from 159 patients undergoing Lewis-Tanner oesophagectomy for carcinoma of the lower two-thirds of the oesophagus and analysed with regard to anastomotic leakage. The 30-day mortality rate was 3.8 per cent and none of these deaths was due to anastomotic leakage. In hospital, mortality was 7.5 per cent. Six patients (3.8 per cent) had evidence of a leak. In four patients this was from the suture line, but in the remaining two it was due to patches of gangrene in the fundus of the transposed stomach and was separate from the anastomosis. Two patients died with an unhealed leak. Anastomotic leaks were minor in three instances and healed with conservative treatment but the fourth required exploration. Gangrene of the oesophageal substitute resulted in gross leakage with mediastinitis and required exploration in both cases. An apparent predisposing cause was evident in five of the six cases with leakage and some of these might have been avoidable. Transthoracic oesophagectomy can be performed with acceptably low mortality and leak rates and may therefore be considered as the treatment of choice for most patients with oesophageal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2702442     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800760207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  7 in total

1.  Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer.

Authors:  W H Allum; S M Griffin; A Watson; D Colin-Jones
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  General surgery.

Authors:  I Taylor
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Does esophagectomy cure a resectable esophageal cancer?

Authors:  I el Nakadi; J J Houben; F Gay; J Closset; M Gelin; J P Lambilliotte
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Prognostic indicators of surgery for esophageal cancer: a 5 year experience.

Authors:  Nadim Khan; Adil Bangash; Muzaffaruddin Sadiq
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.485

5.  Prospective trial comparing contrast swallow, computed tomography and endoscopy to identify anastomotic leak following oesophagogastric surgery.

Authors:  Brian A Hogan; Desmond C Winter; Desmond Winter; David Broe; Patrick Broe; Michael J Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic partial gastric transection and devascularization in order to enhance its flow.

Authors:  Federico Cuenca-Abente; Ahmad Assalia; Gianmattia del Genio; Tomasz Rogula; David Nocca; Kazuki Ueda; Michel Gagner
Journal:  Ann Surg Innov Res       Date:  2008-07-07

7.  A single blinded randomized controlled trial comparing semi-mechanical with hand-sewn cervical anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer (SHARE-study).

Authors:  Nina Nederlof; Hugo W Tilanus; Tahnee de Vringer; Jan J B van Lanschot; Sten P Willemsen; Wim C J Hop; Bas P L Wijnhoven
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.454

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.