Literature DB >> 27023825

One-Year Prospective Evaluation of the Technique of Percutaneous Cortical Bone Trajectory Spondylodesis in Comparison with Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation: A Preliminary Report with Technical Note.

Sumihisa Orita1, Kazuhide Inage1, Go Kubota1, Takeshi Sainoh1, Jun Sato1, Kazuki Fujimoto1, Yasuhiro Shiga1, Junichi Nakamura1, Yusuke Matsuura1, Yawara Eguchi2, Yasuchika Aoki3, Tomoaki Toyone4, Kazuyo Yamauchi1, Yoshihiro Sakuma1, Yasuhiro Oikawa1, Takane Suzuki5, Kazuhisa Takahashi1, Richard A Hynes6, Seiji Ohtori1.   

Abstract

Background and Objective Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) spondylodesis is a novel screw fixation method in which screws are inserted through the pedicle in a caudal-medial to cephalad-lateral direction, providing a similar or more rigid spinal fixation compared with traditional pedicle screws. However, the traditional CBT technique requires invasive detaching and opening of the paraspinal muscle. In a small clinical prospective study we introduced a percutaneous CBT fixation technique by modifying the percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) technique and evaluated the short-term outcome. Materials and Methods We enrolled 40 patients with lower back pain (LBP) and limb r;adicular pain with a diagnosis of spondylolisthesis who underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery. The patients were divided into two groups according to screw trajectory: the percutaneous CBT (pCBT) and the traditional PPS arms (20 patients in each). A consecutive group of 20 patients underwent traditional PPS, and the other underwent pCBT; dorsal spondylodesis was combined with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in both groups. Perioperative data such as operative time, blood loss, duration of fluoroscopy, and total incision length were investigated. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) for LBP and leg pain at baseline, 1, 6, and 12 months. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results We observed no significant disadvantages in pCBT patients in perioperative and postoperative data compared with the PPS group. There were no complications. The pCBT patients showed a significantly shorter total incision length (p < 0.01) with a significantly shorter duration of fluoroscopy (p < 0.05). The postoperative VAS score was significantly improved in the pCBT group, especially 6 months after the surgery (p < 0.05). Conclusion The pCBT spondylodesis provided an outcome comparable with PPS fixation with a tendency for improvement 1 year postsurgery. This technique can be used in appropriate cases, combined with lumbar interbody fusion. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27023825     DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1566118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg        ISSN: 2193-6315            Impact factor:   1.268


  8 in total

Review 1.  Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of cortical bone trajectory screw fixation and traditional pedicle screw fixation in posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jizhou Wang; Xiaoqi He; Tianwei Sun
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Lumbar foraminal stenosis, the hidden stenosis including at L5/S1.

Authors:  Sumihisa Orita; Kazuhide Inage; Yawara Eguchi; Go Kubota; Yasuchika Aoki; Junichi Nakamura; Yusuke Matsuura; Takeo Furuya; Masao Koda; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-06-18

Review 3.  Systematic review of cortical bone trajectory versus pedicle screw techniques for lumbosacral spine fusion.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Vignesh Ramachandran; Tommy M Tran; Kevin P Shah; Matthew Fadhil; Alan Lackey; Nicholas Chang; Ai-Min Wu; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12

Review 4.  Review of Cortical Bone Trajectory: Evidence of a New Technique.

Authors:  Juan Delgado-Fernandez; Maria Ángeles García-Pallero; Guillermo Blasco; Paloma Pulido-Rivas; Rafael G Sola
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-10-11

5.  Comparison of outcomes between cortical screws and traditional pedicle screws for lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tingxin Zhang; Nana Guo; Tiantian Chen; Jinglong Yan; Wei Zhao; Gongping Xu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Salvage Strategy for Failed Spinal Fusion Surgery Using Lumbar Lateral Interbody Fusion technique: A Technical Note.

Authors:  Sumihisa Orita; Takao Nakajima; Kenta Konno; Kazuhide Inage; Takeshi Sainoh; Kazuki Fujimoto; Jun Sato; Yasuhiro Shiga; Hirohito Kanamoto; Koki Abe; Masahiro Inoue; Hideyuki Kinoshita; Masaki Norimoto; Tomotaka Umimura; Yasuchika Aoki; Junichi Nakamura; Yusuke Matsuura; Go Kubota; Yawara Eguchi; Richard A Hynes; Tsutomu Akazawa; Miyako Suzuki; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-01-27

Review 7.  Comparison of cortical bone trajectory versus pedicle screw techniques in lumbar fusion surgery: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing-Nan Hu; Xiao-Feng Yang; Chuan-Ming Li; Xin-Xin Li; Yun-Zhi Ding
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Screws Fixation for Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OL-LIF): A Finite Element Study.

Authors:  Qinjie Ling; Huanliang Zhang; Erxing He
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.