| Literature DB >> 27023539 |
Sadullah Öztürk1, Arif Kösemen2,3, Zafer Şen4, Necmettin Kılınç5, Mika Harbeck6.
Abstract
Poly(3-methylthiophene) (PMeT) thin films were electrochemically deposited on quartz crystal microbalance QCM transducers to investigate their volatile organic compound (VOC) sensing properties depending on ambient conditions. Twelve different VOCs including alcohols, ketones, chlorinated compounds, amines, and the organosphosphate dimethyl methylphosphonate (DMMP) were used as analytes. The responses of the chemical sensors against DMMP were the highest among the tested analytes; thus, fabricated chemical sensors based on PMeT can be evaluated as potential candidates for selectively detecting DMMP. Generally, detection limits in the low ppm range could be achieved. The gas sensing measurements were recorded at various humid air conditions to investigate the effects of the humidity on the gas sensing properties. The sensing performance of the chemical sensors was slightly reduced in the presence of humidity in ambient conditions. While a decrease in sensitivity was observed for humidity levels up to 50% r.h., the sensitivity was nearly unaffected for higher humidity levels and a reliable detection of the VOCs and DMMP was possible with detection limits in the low ppm range.Entities:
Keywords: DMMP; QCM; VOCs; chemical gas sensor; electrochemical deposition; humid air; poly(3-methylthiophene)
Year: 2016 PMID: 27023539 PMCID: PMC4850937 DOI: 10.3390/s16040423
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1SEM images of the electrochemically deposited polymer thin films on QCM transducers in (a) 5 s; (b) 10 s; and (c) 15 s.
Figure 2(a) Frequency shifts of the PMeT-based QCM sensors P1 to P5 in response to 200 ppm o-xylene vapor in dry air (0% r.h.) and (b) the time-transient frequency response of P1 during exposure to methanol vapors in increasing concentrations (0% r.h.).
Figure 3PMeT QCM sensor calibration curves for the analytes in dry air (0% r.h.); (a) ethylacetate; and (b) chlorobenzene.
Figure 4Mean sensitivity in dry air (0% r.h.) of the PMeT sensors for (a) all tested analytes and (b) all analytes excluding DMMP.
Mean Sensitivity (in Hz/ppm), LOD values (in ppm) of the PMeT-based QCM sensors and TLV (in ppm) of the test analytes.
| Analytes/Sensitive Materials | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | TLV | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOD | LOD | LOD | LOD | LOD | |||||||
| 0.4 | 12.5 | 0.39 | 12 | 0.337 | 15 | 0.72 | 7 | 0.536 | 10 | 10 | |
| 0.069 | 72 | 0.104 | 48 | 0.09 | 55 | 0.09 | 55 | 0.076 | 66 | 400 | |
| 0.193 | 26 | 0.318 | 16 | 0.247 | 20 | 0.32 | 16 | 0.277 | 18 | 25 | |
| 0.629 | 8 | 1.092 | 4.5 | 0.405 | 12 | 1.025 | 5 | 0.916 | 6 | 100 | |
| 0.132 | 38 | 0.188 | 26 | 0.085 | 60 | 0.233 | 22 | 0.192 | 26 | 50 | |
| 0.641 | 8 | 0.609 | 8 | 0.884 | 6 | 1.059 | 5 | 0.831 | 6 | 30 | |
| 0.068 | 75 | 0.080 | 62 | 0.055 | 90 | 0.167 | 30 | 0.159 | 30 | 20 | |
| 0.058 | 86 | 0.075 | 66 | 0.027 | 185 | 0.14 | 36 | 0.133 | 38 | 200 | |
| 0.198 | 25 | 0.281 | 18 | 0.147 | 35 | 0.46 | 10 | 0.354 | 15 | 200 | |
| 0.033 | 150 | 0.045 | 110 | 0.035 | 145 | 0.064 | 78 | 0.053 | 95 | 400 | |
| 0.019 | 263 | 0.043 | 116 | 0.058 | 86 | 0.024 | 210 | 0.020 | 250 | 1 | |
| 11.65 | 0.42 | 8.054 | 0.62 | 20.90 | 0.24 | 48.39 | 0.1 | 38.14 | 0.13 | 0.1 | |
* Tetrachloroethylene.
Figure 5(a) Transient signal of the P1 to humid air; (b) time-transient of the P1 versus ethylbenzene in 25% r.h.; (c) sensor responses of the P1 exposed to three test concentrations of ethylbenzene at various test conditions; and (d) the calibration curves of the P1 against toluene under varying humidity.