Literature DB >> 27023408

Reproducibility and reliability of three-dimensional soft tissue landmark identification using three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry.

Asli Baysal, Ahmet Oguz Sahan, Mehmet Ali Ozturk, Tancan Uysal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the intraexaminer repeatability and interexaminer reproducibility of soft tissue landmarks on three-dimensional (3-D) stereophogrammetric images.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four stereophotogrammetric images were taken and 19 soft tissue points were identified. The images were obtained using the 3-DMD Face (3-DMD TM Ltd, Atlanta, Ga) system. Two examiners marked 34 images manually with a mouse-driven cursor 4 weeks apart. Intraexaminer marking differences were calculated and classified as <0.5 mm, 0.5-1 mm, and >1 mm. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for intraexaminer reliability. A paired-samples t-test was used to evaluate the difference between the examiners. Interexaminer reproducibility was evaluated by kappa analysis. Statistical significance was set at P < .05.
RESULTS: Only one landmark (labiale superior) had an intraexaminer marking difference less than 0.5 mm. Existing landmarks had an intraexaminer difference less than 1 mm, but higher than 0.5 mm. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) indicated good intraexaminer repeatability for both observers. The ICC range for examiners 1 and 2 was 0.986-1.000 and 0.990-1.000, respectively. Kappa scores showed good interexaminer agreement, especially on the z-axis.
CONCLUSIONS: Except labiale superior, the soft tissue landmarks used in this study were shown to have moderate reproducibility, but the difference between the landmarks was less than 1 mm, and they had clinically acceptable reproducibility.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-D stereophotogrammetry; Cephalometry; Computer-assisted three-dimensional imaging; Orthodontics; Reproducibility

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27023408     DOI: 10.2319/120715-833.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of soft tissue prediction accuracy for orthognathic surgery with skeletal class III malocclusion using maxillofacial regional aesthetic units.

Authors:  Lei Hou; Yang He; Biao Yi; Xiaoxia Wang; Xiaojing Liu; Yi Zhang; Zili Li
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.606

2.  Evaluating the agreement and reliability of a web-based facial analysis tool for rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Oguzhan Topsakal; Mustafa İlhan Akbaş; Bria Synae Smith; Michael Francis Perez; Ege Can Guden; Mehmet Mazhar Celikoyar
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Does Head Orientation Influence 3D Facial Imaging? A Study on Accuracy and Precision of Stereophotogrammetric Acquisition.

Authors:  Giuditta Battistoni; Diana Cassi; Marisabel Magnifico; Giuseppe Pedrazzi; Marco Di Blasio; Benedetta Vaienti; Alberto Di Blasio
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Early Orthopaedic Treatment of Hemifacial Microsomia.

Authors:  Diana Cassi; Marisabel Magnifico; Mauro Gandolfinini; Ilda Kasa; Giovanni Mauro; Alberto Di Blasio
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2017-12-14

5.  Accuracy and reliability of 2-dimensional photography versus 3-dimensional soft tissue imaging.

Authors:  Irem Ayaz; Eman Shaheen; Medhat Aly; Sohaib Shujaat; Giulia Gallo; Wim Coucke; Constantinus Politis; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2020-03-17

6.  Comparison of three-dimensional soft-tissue evaluations between skeletal and pseudo-class III malocclusions.

Authors:  Burak Kale; Muhammed Hilmi Buyukcavus
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.