Literature DB >> 27023280

Fugitive methane emissions from leak-prone natural gas distribution infrastructure in urban environments.

Margaret F Hendrick1, Robert Ackley2, Bahare Sanaie-Movahed3, Xiaojing Tang4, Nathan G Phillips5.   

Abstract

Fugitive emissions from natural gas systems are the largest anthropogenic source of the greenhouse gas methane (CH4) in the U.S. and contribute to the risk of explosions in urban environments. Here, we report on a survey of CH4 emissions from 100 natural gas leaks in cast iron distribution mains in Metro Boston, MA. Direct measures of CH4 flux from individual leaks ranged from 4.0 - 2.3 × 10(4) g CH4•day(-1). The distribution of leak size is positively skewed, with 7% of leaks contributing 50% of total CH4 emissions measured. We identify parallels in the skewed distribution of leak size found in downstream systems with midstream and upstream stages of the gas process chain. Fixing 'superemitter' leaks will disproportionately stem greenhouse gas emissions. Fifteen percent of leaks surveyed qualified as potentially explosive (Grade 1), and we found no difference in CH4 flux between Grade 1 leaks and all remaining leaks surveyed (p = 0.24). All leaks must be addressed, as even small leaks cannot be disregarded as 'safely leaking.' Key methodological impediments to quantifying and addressing the impacts of leaking natural gas distribution infrastructure involve inconsistencies in the manner in which gas leaks are defined, detected, and classified. To address this need, we propose a two-part leak classification system that reflects both the safety and climatic impacts of natural gas leaks.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distribution pipelines; Greenhouse gas; Methane; Natural gas

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27023280     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.01.094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  5 in total

1.  Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain.

Authors:  Ramón A Alvarez; Daniel Zavala-Araiza; David R Lyon; David T Allen; Zachary R Barkley; Adam R Brandt; Kenneth J Davis; Scott C Herndon; Daniel J Jacob; Anna Karion; Eric A Kort; Brian K Lamb; Thomas Lauvaux; Joannes D Maasakkers; Anthony J Marchese; Mark Omara; Stephen W Pacala; Jeff Peischl; Allen L Robinson; Paul B Shepson; Colm Sweeney; Amy Townsend-Small; Steven C Wofsy; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  An open source algorithm to detect natural gas leaks from mobile methane survey data.

Authors:  Zachary D Weller; Duck Keun Yang; Joseph C von Fischer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Estimating vehicle carbon dioxide emissions from Boulder, Colorado, using horizontal path-integrated column measurements.

Authors:  Eleanor M Waxman; Kevin C Cossel; Fabrizio Giorgetta; Gar-Wing Truong; William C Swann; Ian Coddington; Nathan R Newbury
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 6.133

4.  Home is Where the Pipeline Ends: Characterization of Volatile Organic Compounds Present in Natural Gas at the Point of the Residential End User.

Authors:  Drew R Michanowicz; Archana Dayalu; Curtis L Nordgaard; Jonathan J Buonocore; Molly W Fairchild; Robert Ackley; Jessica E Schiff; Abbie Liu; Nathan G Phillips; Audrey Schulman; Zeyneb Magavi; John D Spengler
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 11.357

5.  Natural Gas Gathering and Transmission Pipelines and Social Vulnerability in the United States.

Authors:  Ryan E Emanuel; Martina A Caretta; Louie Rivers; Pavithra Vasudevan
Journal:  Geohealth       Date:  2021-06-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.