Literature DB >> 27022600

An analytic approach for describing and prioritizing health inequalities at the local level in Canada: a descriptive study.

Cory Neudorf1, Daniel Fuller1, Jennifer Cushon1, Riley Glew1, Hollie Turner1, Cristina Ugolini1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We present the health inequalities analytic approach used by the Saskatoon Health Region to examine health equity. Our aim was to develop a method that will enable health regions to prioritize action on health inequalities.
METHODS: Data from admissions to hospital, physician billing, reportable diseases, vital statistics and childhood immunizations in the city of Saskatoon were analyzed for the years ranging from 1995 to 2011. Data were aggregated to the dissemination area level. The Pampalon deprivation index was used as the measure of socioeconomic status. We calculated annual rates per 1000 people for each outcome. Rate ratios, rate differences, area-level concentration curves and area-level concentration coefficients quantified inequality. An Inequalities Prioritization Matrix was developed to prioritize action for the outcomes showing the greatest inequality. The outcomes measured were cancer, intentional self-harm, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, mental illness, heart disease, diabetes, injury, stroke, chlamydia, tuberculosis, gonorrhea, hepatitis C, high birth weight, low birth weight, teen abortion, teen pregnancy, infant mortality and all-cause mortality.
RESULTS: According to the Inequalities Prioritization Matrix, injuries and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were the first and second priorities, respectively, that needed to be addressed related to inequalities in admissions to hospital. For physician billing, mental disorders and diabetes were high-priority areas. Differences in teen pregnancy and all-cause mortality were the most unequal in the vital statistics data. For communicable diseases, hepatitis C was the highest priority.
INTERPRETATION: Our findings show that health inequalities exist at the local level and that a method can be developed to prioritize action on these inequalities. Policies should consider health inequalities and adopt population-based and targeted actions to reduce inequalities.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 27022600      PMCID: PMC4701660          DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20150049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ Open        ISSN: 2291-0026


  22 in total

1.  Sick individuals and sick populations.

Authors:  G Rose
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  The contribution of primary care systems to health outcomes within Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries, 1970-1998.

Authors:  James Macinko; Barbara Starfield; Leiyu Shi
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Measures of health inequalities: part 1.

Authors:  Enrique Regidor
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Advancing the population health agenda: encouraging the integration of social theory into population health research and practice.

Authors:  Katherine L Frohlich; Eric Mykhalovskiy; Fiona Miller; Mark Daniel
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct

Review 5.  Contribution of primary care to health systems and health.

Authors:  Barbara Starfield; Leiyu Shi; James Macinko
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  Health disparity by neighbourhood income.

Authors:  Mark Lemstra; Cory Neudorf; Johnmark Opondo
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec

7.  Commentary: Individual, ecological and multilevel fallacies.

Authors:  J Michael Oakes
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 7.196

8.  A comparison of individual and area-based socio-economic data for monitoring social inequalities in health.

Authors:  Robert Pampalon; Denis Hamel; Philippe Gamache
Journal:  Health Rep       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.796

9.  Can we reduce health inequalities? An analysis of the English strategy (1997-2010).

Authors:  Johan P Mackenbach
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Variation in health and health care use by socioeconomic status in Winnipeg, Canada: does the system work well? Yes and no.

Authors:  N P Roos; C A Mustard
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.911

View more
  1 in total

1.  Socioeconomic gradients of adverse birth outcomes and related maternal factors in rural and urban Alberta, Canada: a concentration index approach.

Authors:  Maria Ospina; Álvaro Román Osornio-Vargas; Charlene C Nielsen; Susan Crawford; Manoj Kumar; Khalid Aziz; Jesus Serrano-Lomelin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-02       Impact factor: 2.692

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.