Yu-Cong Zou1, Xian-Wen Yang2, Shi-Guo Yuan1, Pei Zhang1, Yi-Kai Li1. 1. School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guang Zhou, People's Republic of China. 2. The Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guang Zhou, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Heterotopic ossification on the enthesis, which develops after subsequent inflammation, is one of the most distinctive features in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Prostaglandin E2 (PGE-2) serves as a key mediator of inflammation and bone remodeling in AS. Celastrol, a well-known Chinese medicinal herb isolated from Tripterygium wilfordii, is widely used in treating inflammatory diseases, including AS. It has been proven that it can inhibit lipopolysac-charide-induced expression of various inflammation mediators, such as PGE-2. However, the mechanism by which celastrol inhibits inflammation-induced bone forming in AS is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether celastrol could inhibit isolated AS fibroblast osteogenesis induced by PGE-2. METHODS: Hip synovial tissues were obtained from six AS patients undergoing total hip replacement in our hospital. Fibroblasts were isolated, primarily cultured, and then treated with PGE-2 for osteogenic induction. Different doses of celastrol and indometacin were added to observe their effects on osteogenic differentiation. Cell proliferation, osteogenic markers, alizarin red staining as well as the activity of alkaline phosphatase were examined in our study. RESULTS: Celastrol significantly inhibits cell proliferation of isolated AS fibroblasts and in vitro osteogenic differentiation compared with control groups in a time- and dose-dependent manner. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that celastrol could inhibit isolated AS fibroblast proliferation and in vitro osteogenic differentiation. The interaction of PI3K/AKT signaling and Wnt protein may be involved in the process. Further studies should be performed in vivo and animal models to identify the potential effect of celastrol on the bone metabolism of AS patients.
BACKGROUND: Heterotopic ossification on the enthesis, which develops after subsequent inflammation, is one of the most distinctive features in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Prostaglandin E2 (PGE-2) serves as a key mediator of inflammation and bone remodeling in AS. Celastrol, a well-known Chinese medicinal herb isolated from Tripterygium wilfordii, is widely used in treating inflammatory diseases, including AS. It has been proven that it can inhibit lipopolysac-charide-induced expression of various inflammation mediators, such as PGE-2. However, the mechanism by which celastrol inhibits inflammation-induced bone forming in AS is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether celastrol could inhibit isolated AS fibroblast osteogenesis induced by PGE-2. METHODS: Hip synovial tissues were obtained from six AS patients undergoing total hip replacement in our hospital. Fibroblasts were isolated, primarily cultured, and then treated with PGE-2 for osteogenic induction. Different doses of celastrol and indometacin were added to observe their effects on osteogenic differentiation. Cell proliferation, osteogenic markers, alizarin red staining as well as the activity of alkaline phosphatase were examined in our study. RESULTS:Celastrol significantly inhibits cell proliferation of isolated AS fibroblasts and in vitro osteogenic differentiation compared with control groups in a time- and dose-dependent manner. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that celastrol could inhibit isolated AS fibroblast proliferation and in vitro osteogenic differentiation. The interaction of PI3K/AKT signaling and Wnt protein may be involved in the process. Further studies should be performed in vivo and animal models to identify the potential effect of celastrol on the bone metabolism of AS patients.
Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), an inflammatory and immune disease that mainly affects axial joints,1 is characterized by a strong correlation between chronic inflammation and abnormal new bone formation.2 However, it is not entirely understood.As an important mediator of inflammation, prostaglandin E2 (PGE-2) modulates the anabolic/catabolic process, which occurs in the bone forming and absorption,3 and is the most abundant among prostaglandins in osteoblasts.4 PGE-2 promotes bone remodeling through inducing osteoblast cell differentiation5,6 and is widely involved in the heterotopic ossification.7,8 Moreover, PGE-2 plays a more essential role in the development of heterotopic ossification than other prostaglandins in the rabbit model.9 PGE-2 could exert antiapoptotic effects on bone marrow stem cells, leading to an increase in the number of cells and subsequent osteoblastic cell differentiation.10 Beside this, PGE-2 is commonly used for osteogenic induction via upregulation of bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2),11 which has the ability to induce osteoblastic precursor cell differentiation and in vitro osteogenesis.12,13To date, the possibility of PGE-2 involvement in the pathophysiogenesis and AS progression has been investigated.14 Genome-wide association studies on AS recently reported that gene prostaglandin E receptor 4, one of the four genes that encode the PGE-2 receptors (EP1–EP4),15 was associated with AS.16 Indeed, EP4-knockout mice exhibited a marked reduction in bone resorption, causing impaired formation of osteoclasts, matrix metalloproteinase MMP-2 and MMP-13.17,18 Furthermore, PGE-2 downregulated Wnt/β-catenin inhibitors, including dickkopf-1 and sclerostin, which have been proven to be two crucial negative regulated factors in AS bone forming,19,20 through AKT/PI3K and Wnt signaling cross-interactions.21 Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were frequently used for patients with AS to inhibit heterotopic ossification over the years, which supports the possibility that prostaglandins were local mediators of inflammation and bone remodeling involved in this process.22–24Although NSAIDs are generally used for AS patients, common side effects associated with the long-term use of NSAIDs include gastrointestinal and cardiovascular toxicities.25,26 Searching for new drugs with low side effects to target AS inflammation and new bone formation are thus urgent tasks.As complementary and alternative medications, traditional Chinese medicine not only has a long history of therapeutic use but also is acceptable and tolerated by patients.27 In People’s Republic of China, Tripterygium wilfordii, which is a medicinal herb, has been used in the treatment of inflammatory and rheumatic diseases for thousands of years. T. wilfordii is reported to improve physical activity and relieve symptoms in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)28 and AS.29 Celastrol, one of the active compounds present in T. wilfordii, has been identified to have strong anti-inflammatory activity30,31 and reduce the severity of clinical arthritis.32,33 Previous reports demonstrated that celastrol strongly suppressed lipopolysaccharide-induced expression of PGE-2 at low concentrations,34 via the downregulation of COX-1 and -2 activation.35 This provided a theoretical basis for understanding the inhibitory effects of celastrol against PGE-2-induced osteogenesis.So far, most studies related to celastrol in inflammatory disease were mainly focused on RA.36 However, the effects of celastrol on AS bone forming have not been documented before. Therefore, our study was carried out to investigate the effect of celastrol on the proliferation and osteogenesis of isolated AS fibroblasts induced by PGE-2 for the first time. To elucidate the mechanisms, we examined the inhibitory role of celastrol on isolated AS fibroblast proliferation and in vitro osteogenic differentiation by using different modern techniques.
Materials and methods
Isolation and culture of hip synovial fibroblasts
Six AS patients with hip joint involved received total hip replacement in our hospital. In this study, patients were referred to a rheumatologist if they were: 1) age ≤45 years, 2) symptoms duration ≥3 months, and 3) asymmetrical arthritis pain plus more than one spondyloarthritis (SpA) feature (Table 1). All the surgical procedures and experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee, Southern Medical University, People’s Republic of China. All patients signed the informed consent. Briefly, the hip capsule synovium tissues were excised from the hip synovial tissue. Synovium was minced and digested with 3 mg/mL collagenase (type I; Sigma-aldrich, Shanghai, China) in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 2.5 hours at 37°C. The isolated tissues were passed through a 70 mm cell strainer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) to form a single-cell suspension. The released cells were washed with PBS, centrifuged at 300× g for 5 minutes, and subsequently resuspended in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), a medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, and supplemented with 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 mg/mL streptomycin, and 2 mM l-glutamine (all of them from Thermo Fisher Scientific). The isolated cells were incubated at 37°C under 5% CO2 to form colonies. The old culture medium was removed and PBS was used to wash the cells one to two times. Then trypsin–EDTA (1 mL/25 cm2) was added to wash the bottom of the culture dish. Then trypsin–EDTA was removed and the culture dish was put into the 37°C cell incubator for 2–3 minutes. Trypsin was inhibited by adding a medium containing 10% FBS. Fresh medium was added and cells were transferred into a new culture dish with normal conditions. The cultured medium with PGE-2 was changed every 2 days throughout the experiments. Flow cytometry was used for fibroblast sorting and identification marked by CD90 and CD106 as previously described.37,38
Table 1
Basic clinical data for AS patients
Patient number
1
2
3
4
5
6
Diagnosis
AS
AS
AS
AS
AS
AS
Age, in years
43
39
35
41
37
26
Sex (male or female)
M
F
M
M
M
M
BMI
20.2
21.3
20.7
21.9
19.7
18.5
HLA-B27
+
+
+
+
+
+
BASDAI
4.1
3.7
4.5
5.6
5.5
4.9
NSAIDs used
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
DMARDs used
MTX + SSZ
MTX + SSZ
MTX + SSZ
MTX + SSZ
MTX + SSZ
MTX + SSZ
Corticosteroids used
No
No
No
No
No
No
TNF-blockade used
No
No
No
No
No
No
mSASS scores
42
33
39
48
55
22
New York grading
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
Note: + is HLA-B27 positive and − is HLA-B27 negative.
Cultured fibroblasts were stimulated with PGE-2 (Sigma) at concentrations of 10−7 M as previously described39 and then incubated in 3 mL of Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium supplemented with antibiotics and fungizone. PGE-2 was added for proliferation and osteogenesis in the whole cell culture process. The medium was changed every 2 days throughout the experiments.
Preparation of celastrol and indometacin
A stock solution of celastrol (20 mg in 0.6 mL of dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO]) was prepared and stored as small aliquots at −20°C until used (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St Louis, MO, USA). Different doses of celastrol (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 μM) used in vitro in this study were based on that used in a previous study.34 Celastrol stock was diluted in PBS, and PBS–DMSO (1.2%) served as its negative control. Indometacin (1.0 μM) was selected as a positive control. DMSO, 1.0 μM of nonselective NSAIDs–indometacin, and the indicated concentrations of celastrol (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 μM) were added on day 12.
Proliferation assay
Cells were seeded in 24-well plates at a density of 1×105 cells/well. Cell proliferation was investigated using an MTS assay on days 12, 14, 17, and 20, respectively. In brief, cells were added to 500 μL of MTS solution and incubated for 4 hours. After that, cells were washed with PBS and added to 500 μL of DMSO to remove the MTS solution. The optical density was measured at 570 nm using a Sunrise absorbance reader (Tecan Group Ltd., Shanghai, People’s Republic of China).
Alkaline phosphatase activity
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity was examined according to a published protocol.13 Culture medium was aspirated from AS fibroblasts that were incubated in plates. The plates were rinsed with 150 mM NaCl and 1 mL of reaction buffer containing 0.25 M 2-methyl-2-amino propanol and 1 mM magnesium chloride. An amount of 2.5 mg/mL of p-nitrophenyl phosphate (Sigma) at pH 10.3 was added to each well at 37°C, respectively. The reaction was stopped after 30 minutes by adding 0.5 mL of 0.3 M Na3PO4 at pH 12.3. ALP activity was assessed by measuring the absorbance of light at 410 nm and comparing the experimental samples with standard solutions of p-nitrophenol and a blank group. ALP was normalized for protein concentration using BCA Protein Assay Reagent (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA), compared with the standard protein, and measured by spectrophotometry at 562 nm.
RNA isolation and quantitative real-time PCR
Total RNA was isolated from the cells by using Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). cDNA was synthesized from 4 μg of total RNA using 200 U of reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The gene expression was normalized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as a housekeeping gene. The sequences of forward and reverse primers used were as follows: BMP-2, 5′-CAGCTTCCACCATGAAGAAT-3′ (F), and 5′-CCAACCTGGTGTCCAAAAGT-3′ (R); runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx-2), 5′-CTCCCTGAACTCTGCACCAA-3′ (F), and 5′-GTTCTGAAGCACCTGAAATGCG-3′ (R); collagen type I alpha 1, 5′-CCTGGATGCCATCAAAGTCT-3′ (F), and 5′-ACTGCAACTGGAATCCATCG-3′ (R); osteocalcin, 5′-ATGAGAGCCCTCACACTCCT-3′ (F), and 5′-CTTGGACACAAAGGCTGCAC-3′ (R); and GAPDH, 5′-CCATGGAGAAGGCTGGGG-3′ (F), and 5′-CAAAGTTGTCATGGATGACC-3′ (R).
Alizarin red staining
For Alizarin red staining, the cells were fixed for 1 hour using 70% ethanol at 4°C. After washing with distilled water for three times, Alizarin red solution (40 mM) was added for 10 minutes. Cells were rinsed with distilled water and subsequently washed with PBS. The stained cells were observed under an inverted microscope. Photomicrographs were obtained by using a charge-coupled device camera. Thereafter, Alizarin red was eluted with 10% cetylpyridinium chloride, and the optical density value was read at 510 nm for quantified analysis of ossification activity.
Western blot analysis
Whole cells were lysed using RIPA buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 0.15 M NaCl, 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 1% NP-40, 1% Na-deoxycholate, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, 1 μg/mL of pepstatin, and 1 μg/mL of leupeptin). Secretory protein was extracted by precipitation with trichloroacetic acid. Western blot analysis was performed with anti-PGE-2, anti-AKT, anti-PI3K, anti-GSK-3β, anti-β-catenin, anti-DKK-1, anti-SOST, or anti-β-actin antibodies (all from Abcam, Cambridge, UK).
Statistical analysis
Data in each group were shown as the mean ± standard deviation calculated from the results of the six samples. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way analysis of variance, and multiple comparison tests were employed by Scheffe’s method. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Effect of celastrol on proliferation of isolated AS fibroblasts
Hip synovial fibroblasts were successfully primary cultured (Figure 1). In order to investigate the potential effect of celastrol on proliferation of isolated AS fibroblasts, we conducted various concentrations of celastrol, indometacin 1.0 μM, normal and DMSO control, and cell viability was determined using MTS assay. Treatment with 2.0 μM celastrol most greatly decreased cell viability, in comparison with other controls (Figures 2 and 3). To further explore the effect of celastrol on cells, we monitored cell proliferation on day 14 using EdU incorporation assay (Figure 4). It was also shown that treatment with 2.0 μM celastrol greatly decreased cell viability, and cells treated with 2.0 μM celastrol led to a significant percentage reduction of EdU-positive AS fibroblasts. An amount of 1.0 μM celastrol exhibited stronger ability to suppress AS fibroblast proliferation compared with 1.0 μM indometacin determined by MTS and EdU analysis (Figures 2–4). The treatment with 1.0 μM indometacin showed slightly more decreased cell viability as well as percentage reduction of EdU-positive AS fibroblasts and was not statistically significant as compared with that in 0.5 μM celastrol (Figures 2–4).
Figure 1
Fibroblasts were successfully cultured and subcultured regularly by changing the culture medium.
Notes: (A) Fibroblasts were isolated from the hip synovium tissue. (B) third generation of cultured fibroblasts. Scale bar is 100 μm and magnification is 1010. (C) and (D) indicates CD90-FITC-positive cells and self control, respectively. The line is the gate that contains wanted CD90-FITC-positive cells. R2 is the classification of CD90-FITC-positive cells. (E) and (F) indicates CD 106-negative and CD90-positive cells, respectively.
Figure 2
Cell proliferation growth curve treated by various doses of Celastrol, 1.0 μM Indometacin as well as negative controls.
Note: This experiment was repeated six times.
Abbreviation: DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide.
Figure 3
Celastrol inhibits cell proliferation by an MTS assay.
Notes: The results of the MTS assay indicated that celastrol inhibits fibroblast proliferation in a time- and dose-dependent manner. This experiment was repeated six times. Values are shown as mean ± standard deviation. The error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 versus normal control group. OD Value (%) = (mean OD value at different time + mean OD value at baseline) ×100% (the same sample).
Cell proliferation is measured by performing an EdU incorporation assay on day 14.
Notes: Positive DAPI staining was in blue in the nucleus, showing the numbers of cells as the control. Red fluorescence revealed the number of EdU-positive cells (all ×100). Histogram indicates the positive rates of EdU-positive cells (*P<0.05). *P<0.05, **P<0.01 versus normal control group. The scale bar is 50 μm.
Abbreviation: DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide.
Effect of celastrol on PGE-2-induced osteogenesis in isolated AS fibroblasts
We performed several assays to assess the effect of celastrol on the osteogenesis of AS fibroblasts.
ALP activity
The results demonstrated that large, medium, and small doses of celastrol as well as indometacin had significant inhibitory effects on the ALP activity of PGE-2-induced AS fibroblasts at 2, 3, and 4 weeks (Figure 5). The ALP activity was inhibited by celastrol in a dose-dependent manner. As shown in Figure 5, its activity decreased gradually when stimulated with increasing doses of celastrol. Similarly, data obtained from the medium dose of celastrol and indometacin had a similar effect on the ALP activity.
Figure 5
Effect of different doses of celastrol on ALP activity in isolated ankylosing spondylitis fibroblasts compared with indometacin and negative control.
Notes: ALP activity was shown as a specific activity (unit/g protein). The concentration of ALP in each chamber was plotted as the mean ± standard deviation in six replicated experiments. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 versus normal control group. Data from indometacin (1.0 μM) and different doses of celastrol as well as negative controls were compared at the same time duration and evaluated by one-way analysis of variance. Multiple comparisons were performed by Scheffe’s method.
The results demonstrated that large, medium, and small doses of celastrol as well as indometacin had a significant inhibitory effect on the alizarin red staining activity of PGE-2-induced AS fibroblasts on days 14, 21, and 28. Mineralization had the largest decline in 2.0 μM celastrol. The medium dose of celastrol and indometacin had a similar effect on the ARS activity. Celastrol 2.0 μM exhibited stronger inhibition effects of mineralization than indometacin 1.0 μM (Figure 6).
Figure 6
Effect of different doses of celastrol on Alizarin red staining in isolated ankylosing spondylitis fibroblasts compared with indometacin and negative control.
Notes: Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 1.0 μM of nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs–indometacin, and the indicated concentrations of celastrol (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 μM) were added on day 12. Representative images of Alizarin red staining were demonstrated on days 14, 21, and 28. The area of mineral deposit in each well was calculated by randomly choosing from four microscopic fields. The Alizarin red was eluted with 10% cetylpyridinium chloride, and the OD value was read at 510 nm for quantification. Each bar represents the mean ± standard deviation in six replicated experiments. Data from cultured fibroblasts treated with different drugs were compared at the same time duration and evaluated by one-way analysis of variance. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 versus control group. The scale bar is 100 μm.
Abbreviation: OD, optical density.
Real-time PCR
The mRNA expressions of BMP-2, type I collagen, Runx-2, and osteocalcin were involved in PGE-2-induced AS fibroblasts. Therefore, to investigate whether celastrol could inhibit PGE-2-induced AS fibroblasts, mRNA levels of BMP-2, type I collagen, Runx-2, and osteocalcin were assessed by real-time PCR on days 14, 21, and 28. Treatment with 1.0 μM celastrol suppressed mRNA and protein expression in a time-dependent manner (Figure 7). The results indicated that the group with 1.0 μM celastrol had a significantly higher mRNA expression of BMP-2, type I collagen, Runx-2, and osteocalcin than the normal group. Especially, celastrol treatment significantly reduced the expression of BMP-2 on days 21 and 28 (**P<0.01). These findings indicated that the medium dose of celastrol had a significant inhibitory effect on mRNA expressions of BMP-2, type I collagen, Runx-2, and osteocalcin in PGE-2-induced AS fibroblasts compared with the normal group (*P<0.05).
Figure 7
An amount of 1.0 μM celastrol inhibits mRNA expressions of osteogenic genes in prostaglandin E2-induced ankylosing spondylitis fibroblasts compared with untreated control.
Notes: The mRNA expressions of bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2), type I collagen, Runx-2, and osteocalcin were detected by real-time PCR on days 14, 21, and 28. The relative expression level was calculated from the threshold cycle (Ct) value of each PCR product and normalized with that of GAPDH by using a comparative Ct method. *P<0.05, **P<0.01.
Effect of celastrol on PGE-2, Wnt, and AKT/PI3K signaling cross-interactions by Western blot analysis
In order to explore the potential mechanism of celastrol on osteogenesis in isolated AS fibroblasts, we performed Western blot analysis to examine the expression of related proteins pretreated with a medium dose of celastrol. The untreated bands were used as controls. The intensity of the bands was quantified by densitometric analysis and normalized against the appropriate controls. The average results from six independent experiments are shown in Figure 8 and Table S1. Accordingly, we found the expression of PGE-2, AKT, and PI3K reduced substantially. The expression of GSK-3β increased significantly, whereas the level of β-catenin decreased with time. On the other hand, the expression of DKK-1 and sclerostin, Wnt signaling inhibitors, elevated gradually.
Figure 8
Celastrol (1.0 μM) impacts the expression of related proteins in isolated fibroblasts.
Notes: Cultured fibroblasts were pretreated with 1.0 μM celastrol. The protein levels were detected by Western blot analysis. The bands of Western blot analysis were digitally detected and normalized with that of β-actin. Each bar represents the mean ± standard deviation in six replicated experiments. Data were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance, and multiple comparisons were performed by Scheffe’s method. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 versus normal control group.
Abbreviation: PGE-2, prostaglandin E2.
Discussion
In terms of AS, inflammation is frequently on the sacroiliac joints,40 anterior and posterior vertebral corners of the spine,41 and hip joints42 where syndesmophytes develop. Previous studies have proposed a positive association between vertebral corner inflammation of baseline magnetic resonance imaging and subsequent development of new syndesmophytes,43–45 which supports a hypothesis that inflammation is implicated in new bone formation of patients with AS. In recent years, the inflammation biomarkers related to AS bone turnover have been mostly focused on tumornecrosis factor-α. Nevertheless, interventions targeting tumornecrosis factor-α were not expected to obtain favorable prognosis on AS radiographic progression.46,47 To date, NSAIDs acted as the most effective drugs to prevent structural damage in AS patients22–24 by inhibiting COX-1 and -2 to reduce the production of PGE-2. This fact indicated that PGE-2 may play a crucial role in the interplay between inflammation and new bone formation in AS.This study was aimed to investigate the underlying mechanism by which celastrol exerts its activity on AS fibroblast proliferation and osteogenesis, thus finding new potential ways for the treatment of AS.Celastrol is one of the remedial ingredients isolated from the root of the Thunder God Vine, also named “Lei Gong Teng” in Chinese. The Thunder God Vine is a perennial vine of Celastraceae family (bittersweet), which has been widely used in People’s Republic of China for the treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases for centuries.48 The plant is poisonous, but its root pulp contains several therapeutically active compounds. Moreover, celastrol is the most widely studied and promising compound isolated from the Thunder God Vine.28 Celastrol contains electrophilic sites within the rings of quinone methide structure and it can react with the nucleophilic thiol groups of cysteine residues and form covalent Michael adducts.49 Its inhibitory effects against COX-1, COX-2, and PGE-2 have been identified,33,34 which are similar with NSAIDs. The difference is that celastrol is also endowed with cytotoxic-like function and could exhibit anticancer effects.49–51In the present study, results showed that celastrol effectively inhibited proliferation and bone formation of PGE-2-induced AS fibroblasts. Notably, to elucidate the potential mechanism of antibone forming action of celastrol, we found that cross-interactions of Wnt, BMP-2, and AKT/PI3K signaling pathways were involved in this process.We selected AS fibroblasts as target cells. In addition to mesenchymal stem cells, fibroblast are another category with osteogenic potentials, especially in pathological conditions.52 Fibroblasts are the most common cells in connective tissues around joints. Fibroblasts and osteoblasts all originate from mesenchymal stem cells with overlapping phenotypes and similar differentiation pathways, which enables possible mutual biological transformation.53 Fibroblasts could also provide surroundings for calcium deposition and bone formation by producing extracellular matrix vesicles and type I collagen, which plays a crucial role in trauma repair and ectopic ossification in certain pathophysiologic processes.54,55 In addition, fibroblasts also express osteogenic markers Runx-2 and osteocalcin (OCN). It has been reported that NIH3T3 cells (a fibroblast cell line derived from mouse) could express osteogenic markers and develop mineralization deposits in vitro induced by dexamethasone and 1,25(OH)2D3.56 Human derived ligament fibroblasts could also develop osteogenic differentiation in conditioned medium.57 Previous studies also identified that activities of fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis could be enhanced by inflammatory mediators in vitro, which develop bone formation, proliferation of the connective tissues, or fibrosis.58,59 An early immunohistochemistry analysis by Ono et al60 found four cell types are present in the ossified ligament tissues: chondrocytes, chondrocyte-like cells, fibroblast-like cells, and fibroblasts. According to the distribution of cells, the authors believed that chondrocytes are derived from fibroblasts. In addition, chondrocyte-like cells and fibroblast-like cells are the same cell types, both originating from fibroblasts.56 Other experimental and animal studies have also proved that fibroblasts have osteogenic potential in certain conditions.61,62 All these findings suggest fibroblasts in AS may convert to osteoblast-like type cells and express osteogenic makers under certain conditions.Fibroblasts isolated from AS patients were significantly affected by PGE-2-induced expression of osteogenic phenotype. The results of our study highlighted a marked reduction in cell proliferation and distinctive attenuation of osteogenic activity of celastrol-treated AS fibroblasts compared to negative controls in a time- and dose-dependent manner. In addition, a medium dose of celastrol exhibited similar effects in both ARS staining and ALP activity, as indometacin. As mentioned above, we hypothesized that this protection against abnormal new bone formation may be mediated via the cross-interactions of PGE-2 and different signaling pathways, such as Wnt, BMP-2, and AKT/PI3K. The Wnt pathway and PGE-2 have mutual cross-interactions. Especially, canonical Wnt proteins promoted PI3K/Akt activity, resulting in GSK-3β phosphorylation and the growth of free β-catenin levels.63 On the other hand, PGE-2 activated the trimetric G-protein by binding to its EP2 receptor. The Gβγ subunits activated PI3-kinase which in turn activated Akt. After that, Akt phosphorylated GSK-3β leading to inhibiting its phosphorylation of β-catenin.64 All in all, the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway is involved in PGE-2-induced osteogenic differentiation. Besides, PGE-2 exerted its anabolic effects to induce BMP-2 and COX-2 via activating osteoblastic EP2 and EP4 receptors.65 BMP-2 in turn induced COX-2 expression, resulting in accelerating the production of PGE-2.66Previous studies widely reported the effect of celastrol on osteoclasts in RA models. Nanjundaiah et al67 found celastrol could inhibit inflammation-induced osteoclasto-genesis in arthritic rats via stimulating RANKL production and increasing RANKL/OPG ratio. Moreover, Gan et al68 observed that celastrol not only directly suppressed the formation and function of osteoclasts, but also reduced the RANKL-induced expression of osteoclastic genes and transcriptional factors. In our study, celastrol inhibited fibroblast proliferation and osteogenesis, which implicated that celastrol performed “complete inhibition” of osteoblasts, fibroblasts, and osteoclasts. This was why celastrol impaired their further activities and functions.AS damages bone in the same way as RA in the initial stage of the disease. Nevertheless, some cases are followed by abnormal bone formation, which is probably linked with the subtle modulation via inflammation and bone metabolism on the different stages of disease. Although the underlying mechanism has not been clearly delineated, we hypothesize that it is associated with the attenuation of PGE-2. Our results supported this proposition. A low dose of exogenous PGE-2 (<0.5 mg) stimulated bone apposition. Instead, high doses caused bone resorption, which is expected to be identified in a further study.In our study, several limitations should be taken into account. First, we only took in vitro AS fibroblasts as study samples. Therefore, animal models or other in vivo models should be performed to substantiate these results. Second, we only demonstrated the role of celastrol on PGE-2 and downstream proteins of PGE-2. Despite all this, other inflammation markers related to bone metabolism are worthy of further in-depth study. Last, we only obtained tissues from AS patients due to ethical reasons. Additional tissue samples from healthy controls, RA, OA patients, and so on would be helpful to identify whether the findings are specific to AS.In conclusion, our study provided a novel insight regarding the inhibitory effect of celastrol on the proliferation of AS fibroblasts and PEG-2-induced osteogenesis. We demonstrated for the first time that celastrol inhibited PGE-2-induced osteogenic differentiation in AS fibroblasts. Meanwhile, celastrol could also reduce the number of fibroblasts in a time- and dose-dependent manner. These results revealed that celastrol inhibits further differentiation of fibroblasts into osteogenic phenotype. In future studies, application of celastrol might be a promising approach in the treatment of new bone formation in AS by performing pharmacokinetic and toxicological analyses in animals and humans as well as randomized control studies.Raw Data Of Western Blot Analysis Results with 1.0 μM celastrol compared with untreated groupNote: The bolding indicates that P<0.05 was regarded as significant.Abbreviations: PGE-2, prostaglandin E2; w, weeks.
Table S1
Raw Data Of Western Blot Analysis Results with 1.0 μM celastrol compared with untreated group
Integral optical density
Sample
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mean ± standard deviation
Student’s t-test
Mean
Standard deviation
PGE-2
Untreated
77,962.000
121,535.000
154,375.000
172,965.000
209,880.000
259,912.000
166,104.833
64,274.925
2w
80,463.000
108,513.393
137,790.179
152,916.071
183,369.643
230,414.286
148,911.095
53,454.639
3w
50,277.000
102,007.143
97,456.429
142,857.000
138,725.000
184,820.000
119,357.095
46,401.450
4w
19,529.339
46,443.388
58,524.380
68,235.124
79,473.967
99,511.983
61,953.030
27,601.439
AKT
Untreated
75,130.000
121,535.000
154,467.000
173,849.000
271,412.000
300,198.000
182,765.167
87,021.237
2w
73,375.000
89,588.000
95,846.000
138,928.000
161,910.000
208,731.000
128,063.000
51,536.457
3w
35,984.000
67,491.765
98,782.000
88,292.000
113,370.588
176,478.000
96,733.059
47,448.950
4w
16,084.074
40,302.222
51,192.593
60,956.667
70,521.852
88,330.000
54,564.568
25,024.513
PI3K
Untreated
100,313.000
125,077.000
156,274.000
175,708.000
211,910.000
281,901.000
175,197.167
65,133.028
2w
55,197.391
103,168.696
131,959.130
147,187.826
176,207.826
221,958.261
139,279.855
57,774.388
3w
59,597.924
89,402.076
103,023.529
115,707.958
134,275.433
169,376.471
111,897.232
37,786.666
4w
23,267.000
55,707.500
69,714.500
82,346.500
96,014.500
120,000.000
74,508.333
33,453.162
GSK-3β
Untreated
73,265.000
125,363.000
156,274.000
180,334.000
212,244.000
306,148.000
175,604.667
79,721.611
2w
95,143.179
146,213.078
141,615.558
198,020.000
241,396.843
326,957.159
191,557.636
83,312.457
3w
108,984.286
168,448.571
192,251.429
226,865.714
276,860.000
403,350.000
229,460.000
102,090.639
4w
148,190.987
210,502.146
283,343.348
303,182.403
343,927.039
550,534.335
306,613.376
138,403.780
β-catenin
Untreated
81,591.000
127,190.000
158,698.000
183,174.000
212,998.000
281,072.000
174,120.500
69,331.209
2w
82,537.963
111,828.704
140,525.000
157,359.259
187,846.296
286,344.444
161,073.611
71,328.128
3w
74,752.381
102,926.984
119,524.603
153,410.317
158,575.397
218,142.063
137,888.624
50,309.480
4w
15,518.519
38,137.037
50,235.185
60,865.926
69,654.074
86,392.222
534,67.160
24,845.021
DKK-1
Untreated
83,856.000
127,417.000
159,792.000
185,990.000
213,286.000
299,094.000
178,239.167
74,465.589
2w
158,499.200
211,062.400
260,292.800
299,499.200
354,587.200
508,168.000
298,684.800
123,136.173
3w
17,6312.281
234,470.175
285,489.474
328,710.526
406,571.930
574,935.088
334,414.912
141,752.052
4w
217,241.379
270,662.562
322,753.695
366,940.887
454,352.217
626,766.010
376,452.791
147,131.875
SOST
Untreated
913,43.000
129,557.000
159,792.000
186,066.000
213,286.000
351,542.000
188,597.667
90,488.470
2w
153,626.362
178,861.656
200,989.924
254,365.468
282,563.998
420,596.405
248,500.635
96,870.683
3w
204,862.000
270,450.000
325,814.000
375,354.000
463,492.000
683,864.000
387,306.000
170,068.344
4w
231,531.429
313,048.571
368,368.571
413,237.143
514,397.143
721,402.857
426,997.619
172,702.782
β-actin
Untreated
86,493.000
124,619.000
148,869.000
171,025.000
202,315.000
296,635.000
171,659.333
72,862.317
2w
86,493.000
123,294.000
148,208.000
169,948.000
202,173.000
296,319.000
171,072.500
72,958.144
3w
85,229.000
121,535.000
147,596.000
169,017.000
199,805.000
294189.000
169,561.833
72,591.980
4w
85,659.000
122,272.000
148,145.000
169,266.000
200,881.000
294,312.000
170,089.167
72,493.597
PGE-2/β-actin
Untreated
0.901
0.975
1.037
1.011
1.037
0.876
0.97±0.07
0.973
0.070
2w
0.930
0.880
0.930
0.900
0.907
0.778
0.89±0.06
0.015
0.887
0.057
3w
0.590
0.839
0.660
0.845
0.694
0.628
0.71±0.11
0.015
0.710
0.108
4w
0.228
0.380
0.395
0.403
0.396
0.338
0.36±0.07
0.000
0.357
0.067
AKT/β-actin
Untreated
0.869
0.975
1.038
1.017
1.342
1.012
1.04±0.16
1.042
0.159
2w
0.848
0.727
0.647
0.817
0.801
0.704
0.76±0.08
0.011
0.757
0.077
3w
0.422
0.555
0.669
0.522
0.567
0.600
0.56±0.08
0.025
0.556
0.082
4w
0.188
0.330
0.346
0.360
0.351
0.300
0.31±0.06
0.000
0.312
0.065
PI3K/β-actin
Untreated
1.160
1.004
1.050
1.027
1.047
0.950
1.04±0.07
1.040
0.069
2w
0.638
0.837
0.890
0.866
0.872
0.749
0.81±0.1
0.011
0.809
0.097
3w
0.699
0.736
0.698
0.685
0.672
0.576
0.68±0.05
0.024
0.678
0.054
4w
0.272
0.456
0.471
0.486
0.478
0.408
0.43±0.08
0.001
0.428
0.082
GSK-3β/β-actin
Untreated
0.847
1.006
1.050
1.054
1.049
1.032
1.01±0.08
1.006
0.080
2w
1.100
1.186
0.956
1.165
1.194
1.103
1.12±0.09
0.070
1.117
0.089
3w
1.279
1.386
1.303
1.342
1.386
1.371
1.34±0.05
0.000
1.344
0.045
4w
1.730
1.722
1.913
1.791
1.712
1.871
1.79±0.08
0.000
1.790
0.085
β-catenin/β-actin
Untreated
0.943
1.021
1.066
1.071
1.053
0.948
1.02±0.06
1.017
0.058
2w
0.954
0.907
0.948
0.926
0.929
0.966
0.94±0.02
0.047
0.938
0.022
3w
0.877
0.847
0.810
0.908
0.794
0.742
0.83±0.06
0.015
0.829
0.060
4w
0.181
0.312
0.339
0.360
0.347
0.294
0.31±0.07
0.000
0.305
0.065
DKK1/β-actin
Untreated
0.970
1.022
1.073
1.088
1.054
1.008
1.04±0.04
1.036
0.044
2w
1.833
1.712
1.756
1.762
1.754
1.715
1.76±0.04
0.000
1.755
0.044
3w
2.069
1.929
1.934
1.945
2.035
1.954
1.98±0.06
0.000
1.978
0.059
4w
2.536
2.214
2.179
2.168
2.262
2.130
2.25±0.15
0.001
2.248
0.148
SOST/β-actin
Untreated
1.056
1.040
1.073
1.088
1.054
1.185
1.08±0.05
1.083
0.053
2w
1.776
1.451
1.356
1.497
1.398
1.419
1.48±0.15
0.002
1.483
0.151
3w
2.404
2.225
2.207
2.221
2.320
2.325
2.28±0.08
0.000
2.284
0.078
4w
2.703
2.560
2.487
2.441
2.561
2.451
2.53±0.1
0.000
2.534
0.098
Relative PGE-2/β-actin
Untreated
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1±0
1.000
0.000
2w
1.032
0.902
0.897
0.890
0.874
0.887
0.91±0.06
0.016
0.914
0.059
3w
0.654
0.861
0.637
0.836
0.669
0.717
0.73±0.1
0.016
0.729
0.096
4w
0.253
0.389
0.381
0.399
0.381
0.386
0.36±0.06
0.000
0.365
0.055
Relative AKT/β-actin
Untreated
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1±0
1.000
0.000
2w
0.977
0.745
0.623
0.804
0.597
0.696
0.74±0.14
0.006
0.740
0.139
3w
0.486
0.569
0.645
0.514
0.423
0.593
0.54±0.08
0.036
0.538
0.080
4w
0.216
0.338
0.333
0.354
0.262
0.297
0.3±0.05
0.000
0.300
0.053
Relative PI3K/β-actin
Untreated
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1±0
1.000
0.000
2w
0.550
0.834
0.848
0.843
0.832
0.788
0.78±0.12
0.006
0.783
0.116
3w
0.603
0.733
0.665
0.666
0.642
0.606
0.65±0.05
0.021
0.652
0.048
4w
0.234
0.454
0.448
0.474
0.456
0.429
0.42±0.09
0.001
0.416
0.090
Relative GSK-3β/β-actin
Untreated
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1±0
1.000
0.000
2w
1.299
1.179
0.910
1.105
1.138
1.069
1.12±0.13
0.077
1.117
0.128
3w
1.510
1.378
1.241
1.273
1.321
1.328
1.34±0.09
0.000
1.342
0.095
4w
2.042
1.711
1.822
1.699
1.632
1.812
1.79±0.14
0.000
1.786
0.145
Relative β-catenin/β-actin
Untreated
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1±0
1.000
0.000
2w
1.012
0.889
0.889
0.865
0.883
1.020
0.93±0.07
0.049
0.926
0.070
3w
0.930
0.830
0.760
0.847
0.754
0.783
0.82±0.07
0.017
0.817
0.067
4w
0.192
0.306
0.318
0.336
0.329
0.310
0.3±0.05
0.000
0.298
0.053
Relative DKK1/β-actin
Untreated
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1±0
1.000
0.000
2w
1.890
1.674
1.636
1.621
1.664
1.701
1.7±0.1
0.000
1.698
0.098
3w
2.134
1.887
1.802
1.788
1.930
1.938
1.91±0.13
0.000
1.913
0.125
4w
2.616
2.165
2.030
1.993
2.145
2.112
2.18±0.23
0.002
2.177
0.225
Relative SOST/β-actin
Untreated
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1±0
1.000
0.000
2w
1.682
1.395
1.263
1.376
1.326
1.198
1.37±0.17
0.003
1.373
0.168
3w
2.276
2.140
2.057
2.041
2.200
1.962
2.11±0.12
0.000
2.113
0.115
4w
2.559
2.463
2.317
2.244
2.429
2.068
2.35±0.18
0.001
2.347
0.176
PGE-2
AKT
PI3K
GSK-3β
β-catenin
DKK1
SOST
Untreated
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
2w
0.914
0.740
0.783
1.117
0.926
1.698
1.373
3w
0.729
0.538
0.652
1.342
0.817
1.913
2.113
4w
0.365
0.300
0.416
1.786
0.298
2.177
2.347
Untreated
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
2w
0.059
0.139
0.116
0.128
0.070
0.098
0.168
3w
0.096
0.080
0.048
0.095
0.067
0.125
0.115
4w
0.055
0.053
0.090
0.145
0.053
0.225
0.176
Note: The bolding indicates that P<0.05 was regarded as significant.
Authors: Y Sakuma; K Tanaka; M Suda; Y Komatsu; A Yasoda; M Miura; A Ozasa; S Narumiya; Y Sugimoto; A Ichikawa; F Ushikubi; K Nakao Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Daichi Chikazu; Xiaodong Li; Hiroshi Kawaguchi; Yoko Sakuma; Olga S Voznesensky; Douglas J Adams; Manshan Xu; Kazuto Hoshio; Vedran Katavic; Harvey R Herschman; Lawrence G Raisz; Carol C Pilbeam Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Désirée van der Heijde; Robert Landewé; Xenofon Baraliakos; Harry Houben; Astrid van Tubergen; Paul Williamson; Weichun Xu; Daniel Baker; Neil Goldstein; Jürgen Braun Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2008-10
Authors: Charlotte Klasen; Anja Meyer; Paula S Wittekind; Iris Waqué; Schafiq Nabhani; David M Kofler Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2019-06-28 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Cong Ma; Bo Wen; Qin Zhang; Pei-Pei Shao; Wen Gu; Kun Qu; Yang Shi; Bei Wang Journal: Drug Des Devel Ther Date: 2019-02-11 Impact factor: 4.162