| Literature DB >> 27022235 |
Yun-Qing Gu1, Tian-Xing Fan1, Jie-Gang Mou1, Wei-Bo Yu2, Gang Zhao3, Evan Wang4.
Abstract
In order to achieve the nonsmooth surface drag reduction structure on the inner polymer coating of oil and gas pipelines and improve the efficiency of pipeline transport, a structural model of the machining robot on the pipe inner coating is established. Based on machining robot, an experimental technique is applied to research embossing and coating problems of rolling-head, and then the molding process rules under different conditions of rolling temperatures speeds and depth are analyzed. Also, an orthogonal experiment analysis method is employed to analyze the different effects of hot-rolling process apparatus on the embossed pits morphology and quality of rolling. The results also reveal that elevating the rolling temperature or decreasing the rolling speed can also improve the pit structure replication rates of the polymer coating surface, and the rolling feed has little effect on replication rates. After the rolling-head separates from the polymer coating, phenomenon of rebounding and refluxing of the polymer coating occurs, which is the reason of inability of the process. A continuous hot-rolling method for processing is used in the robot and the hot-rolling process of the processing apparatus is put in a dynamics analysis.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27022235 PMCID: PMC4770325 DOI: 10.1155/2016/4915974
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Bionics Biomech ISSN: 1176-2322 Impact factor: 1.781
Figure 1The model of processing module gear drive system.
Figure 2Model of hot-rolling-head: (a) the morphology of rolling-head parameter and (b) the physical hot-rolling-head.
Figure 3Curve of temperature versus that in hot-rolling process.
Figure 4The comparison chart between actual intermediate sectional area and ideal intermediate sectional area: (1) ideal pit morphology and (2) actual pit morphology.
Figure 5The changing chart in which replication rate changed with rolling temperature.
Figure 6A changing chart in which replication rate changed with rolling depth.
Three factors and 3 horizontal test tables.
| Horizontal | Factors | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
| 1 | 0.2 | 2 | 140 |
| 2 | 0.4 | 1 | 145 |
| 3 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 150 |
The coupling test analysis table of three factors A, B, and C.
| Factors | Results | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number |
|
|
| Replication rate/% | |||
|
|
|
| Average | ||||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 38.7 | 39.4 | 38.4 | 38.8 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 61.7 | 59.6 | 59.7 | 60.3 |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 83.2 | 84.3 | 83.8 | 83.8 |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 41.3 | 42.1 | 45.7 | 43.0 |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 68.6 | 67.6 | 68.5 | 68.2 |
| 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 73.8 | 74.6 | 73.7 | 74.0 |
| 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 49.0 | 50.6 | 51.2 | 50.3 |
| 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 57.3 | 57.6 | 57.4 | 57.4 |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 78.2 | 78.6 | 78.7 | 78.5 |
|
| 182.9 | 132.1 | 170.2 | ||||
|
| 185.2 | 185.9 | 181.8 | ||||
|
| 186.2 | 236.3 | 202.3 | ||||
|
| 61.0 | 44.0 | 56.7 | ||||
|
| 61.7 | 62.0 | 60.6 | ||||
|
| 62.1 | 78.8 | 67.4 | ||||
| Value | 1.1 | 34.8 | 10.7 | ||||
| Rank | 3 | 1 | 2 | ||||
| Best program |
|
|
| ||||