Vicki S Conn1, Todd M Ruppar2, Maithe Enriquez2, Pamela S Cooper2. 1. School of Nursing, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA. Electronic address: conn@missouri.edu. 2. School of Nursing, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Using meta-analytic procedures to synthesize changes in patient-centered outcomes after medication adherence interventions. METHODS: Strategies to locate studies included online searches of 13 databases and 19 research registries, hand searches of 57 journals, and author and ancestry searches of all eligible studies. Search terms included patient compliance, medication adherence, and related terms. Searches were conducted for all studies published since 1960. Eligible published or unpublished primary studies tested medication adherence interventions and reported medication knowledge, quality of life, physical function, and symptom outcomes. Primary study attributes and outcome data were reliably coded. Overall standardized mean differences (SMDs) were analyzed using random-effects models. Dichotomous and continuous moderator analyses and funnel plots were used to explore risks of bias. RESULTS: Thorough searching located 141 eligible reports. The reports included 176 eligible comparisons between treatment and control subjects across 23,318 subjects. Synthesis across all comparisons yielded statistically significant SMDs for medication knowledge (d = 0.449), quality of life (d = 0.127), physical function (d = 0.142), and symptoms (d = 0.182). The overall SMDs for studies focusing on subsamples of patients with specific illnesses were more modest but also statistically significant. Of specific symptoms analyzed (depression, anxiety, pain, energy/vitality, cardiovascular, and respiratory), only anxiety failed to show a significant improvement after medication adherence interventions. Most SMDs were significantly heterogeneous, and risk of bias analyses suggested links between study quality and SMDs. CONCLUSIONS: Modest but significant improvements in patient-centered outcomes were observed after medication adherence interventions.
OBJECTIVE: Using meta-analytic procedures to synthesize changes in patient-centered outcomes after medication adherence interventions. METHODS: Strategies to locate studies included online searches of 13 databases and 19 research registries, hand searches of 57 journals, and author and ancestry searches of all eligible studies. Search terms included patient compliance, medication adherence, and related terms. Searches were conducted for all studies published since 1960. Eligible published or unpublished primary studies tested medication adherence interventions and reported medication knowledge, quality of life, physical function, and symptom outcomes. Primary study attributes and outcome data were reliably coded. Overall standardized mean differences (SMDs) were analyzed using random-effects models. Dichotomous and continuous moderator analyses and funnel plots were used to explore risks of bias. RESULTS: Thorough searching located 141 eligible reports. The reports included 176 eligible comparisons between treatment and control subjects across 23,318 subjects. Synthesis across all comparisons yielded statistically significant SMDs for medication knowledge (d = 0.449), quality of life (d = 0.127), physical function (d = 0.142), and symptoms (d = 0.182). The overall SMDs for studies focusing on subsamples of patients with specific illnesses were more modest but also statistically significant. Of specific symptoms analyzed (depression, anxiety, pain, energy/vitality, cardiovascular, and respiratory), only anxiety failed to show a significant improvement after medication adherence interventions. Most SMDs were significantly heterogeneous, and risk of bias analyses suggested links between study quality and SMDs. CONCLUSIONS: Modest but significant improvements in patient-centered outcomes were observed after medication adherence interventions.
Authors: Kristina M Cordasco; Steven M Asch; Doug S Bell; Jeffrey J Guterman; Sandra Gross-Schulman; Lois Ramer; Uri Elkayam; Idalid Franco; Cianna L Leatherwood; Carol M Mangione Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: A J Farmer; A N Wade; D P French; J Simon; P Yudkin; A Gray; A Craven; L Goyder; R R Holman; D Mant; A-L Kinmonth; H A W Neil Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: J T Hanlon; M Weinberger; G P Samsa; K E Schmader; K M Uttech; I K Lewis; P A Cowper; P B Landsman; H J Cohen; J R Feussner Journal: Am J Med Date: 1996-04 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Sheri L Maddigan; Sumit R Majumdar; Lisa M Guirguis; Richard Z Lewanczuk; T K Lee; Ellen L Toth; Jeffrey A Johnson Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: David Alejandro González-Chica; Robert Adams; Eleonora Dal Grande; Jodie Avery; Phillipa Hay; Nigel Stocks Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2017-02-11 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Nanette K Wenger; Anita Arnold; C Noel Bairey Merz; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff; Keith C Ferdinand; Jerome L Fleg; Martha Gulati; Ijeoma Isiadinso; Dipti Itchhaporia; KellyAnn Light-McGroary; Kathryn J Lindley; Jennifer H Mieres; Mary L Rosser; George R Saade; Mary Norine Walsh; Carl J Pepine Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Margaret Bevans; Areej El-Jawahri; D Kathryn Tierney; Lori Wiener; William A Wood; Flora Hoodin; Erin E Kent; Paul B Jacobsen; Stephanie J Lee; Matthew M Hsieh; Ellen M Denzen; Karen L Syrjala Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2016-09-19 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Ignacio Aznar-Lou; Ana Fernández; Montserrat Gil-Girbau; Ramón Sabés-Figuera; Marta Fajó-Pascual; María Teresa Peñarrubia-María; Antoni Serrano-Blanco; Patricia Moreno-Peral; Albert Sánchez-Niubó; Marian March-Pujol; Maria Rubio-Valera Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2017-07-31 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Kyriakos Souliotis; Theodoros V Giannouchos; Chistina Golna; Evangelos Liberopoulos Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2021-06-22 Impact factor: 3.440