Li-Qiang Wei1, Yong-Gang Liang2, Yong Zhao1, Hui-Tao Liang3, Dong-Chun Qin4, Ming-Cong She1. 1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China. 2. Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated with Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China. 3. Red Cross Blood Center of He'nan Province, Zhengzhou, Henan, China. 4. Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China. Electronic address: qindongchun2011@126.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The treatment of belimumab plus standard therapy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been studied extensively in recent years. Our aim was to estimate the efficacy and safety of this therapy compared with placebo plus standard therapy in patients with SLE. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM, Chinese), and Wanfang Database (Chinese) were searched for all randomized clinical trials that mainly studied the efficacy and safety of belimumab plus standard therapy before June 2015. We extracted or calculated the rate of the SLE Response Index and adverse event rate at 52 weeks in all the included studies. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI between the 2 groups in this meta-analysis was conducted by using a random-effects model. Sensitivity and publication bias analyses were also performed. All statistical tests were performed by using Stata software version 12.0 (StataCorp., College Station, Texas). FINDINGS: In the overall samples (4 studies, N = 4692 ), a significantly higher SLE Response Index rate at 52 weeks was found in belimumab plus standard therapy group compared with the placebo plus standard therapy group in all studies (OR = 1.49; 95% CI, 1.26-1.77 ; P < 0.001 ). When assessed with the incidence of serious adverse events, the data revealed that there was no significant difference between the 2 groups, with pooled OR = 1.08; 95% CI, 0.83-1.39; P = 0.573; OR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02-1.48; P = 0.029; and OR = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.88-1.29; P = 0.506. IMPLICATIONS: The results suggest that treatment with belimumab plus standard therapy is more effective than placebo plus standard therapy in SLE patients, which represents major progress in the treatment of SLE. Regardless of the statistical analyses, further research is necessary to optimize treatment effects.
PURPOSE: The treatment of belimumab plus standard therapy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been studied extensively in recent years. Our aim was to estimate the efficacy and safety of this therapy compared with placebo plus standard therapy in patients with SLE. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM, Chinese), and Wanfang Database (Chinese) were searched for all randomized clinical trials that mainly studied the efficacy and safety of belimumab plus standard therapy before June 2015. We extracted or calculated the rate of the SLE Response Index and adverse event rate at 52 weeks in all the included studies. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI between the 2 groups in this meta-analysis was conducted by using a random-effects model. Sensitivity and publication bias analyses were also performed. All statistical tests were performed by using Stata software version 12.0 (StataCorp., College Station, Texas). FINDINGS: In the overall samples (4 studies, N = 4692 ), a significantly higher SLE Response Index rate at 52 weeks was found in belimumab plus standard therapy group compared with the placebo plus standard therapy group in all studies (OR = 1.49; 95% CI, 1.26-1.77 ; P < 0.001 ). When assessed with the incidence of serious adverse events, the data revealed that there was no significant difference between the 2 groups, with pooled OR = 1.08; 95% CI, 0.83-1.39; P = 0.573; OR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02-1.48; P = 0.029; and OR = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.88-1.29; P = 0.506. IMPLICATIONS: The results suggest that treatment with belimumab plus standard therapy is more effective than placebo plus standard therapy in SLEpatients, which represents major progress in the treatment of SLE. Regardless of the statistical analyses, further research is necessary to optimize treatment effects.