Getachew Kassa1, Dejana Selenic2, Maria Lahuerta3, Tendani Gaolathe4, Yang Liu2, Garegole Letang4, Cari Courtenay-Quirk2, Nelson Kiama Mwaniki5, Sarah Gaolekwe6, Naomi Bock2. 1. Mailman School of Public Health, ICAP-Columbia University, New York, NY. Electronic address: gechbel@gmail.com. 2. Division of Global HIV/AIDS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. 3. Mailman School of Public Health, ICAP-Columbia University, New York, NY; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY. 4. Botswana Harvard AIDS Institute Partnerships, Gaborone, Botswana. 5. Ministry of Health Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana. 6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study assessed reporting behavior and satisfaction with postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) systems among health care workers (HCWs) at risk for occupational bloodborne pathogen exposure (BPE) in 3 public hospitals in Botswana. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey among HCWs provided information on perceptions, attitudes, and experiences with occupational exposures, reporting, and postexposure care. HCWs potentially in contact with blood or body fluids were surveyed using audio computer-assisted self-interview. RESULTS: Between August 2012 and April 2013, 1,624 HCWs completed the survey; most were women (72%), and almost half (48%) were nurses. Sixty-seven percent of them had ever received training related to BPE management; 62% perceived themselves to be at high risk for BPE. Among the 426 HCWs who were exposed to sharps injuries or splashes in the last 6 months, 160 (37%) reported the exposure. Of these, 111 of the 160 (69%) received PEP, and 79 of the 111 (71%) completed their medication. Whereas >92% of the total HCWs had ever been tested for HIV, only 557 (37%) were tested in their own health facility. Most HCWs (87%, n = 1,406) reported they would be interested in testing themselves. Of HCWs who reported an exposure, less than half (49%, n = 78) were satisfied with existing reporting systems. CONCLUSIONS: Underreporting of occupational exposures and dissatisfaction with PEP management is common among HCWs. Improved PEP management strategies and regular monitoring are needed.
BACKGROUND: This study assessed reporting behavior and satisfaction with postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) systems among health care workers (HCWs) at risk for occupational bloodborne pathogen exposure (BPE) in 3 public hospitals in Botswana. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey among HCWs provided information on perceptions, attitudes, and experiences with occupational exposures, reporting, and postexposure care. HCWs potentially in contact with blood or body fluids were surveyed using audio computer-assisted self-interview. RESULTS: Between August 2012 and April 2013, 1,624 HCWs completed the survey; most were women (72%), and almost half (48%) were nurses. Sixty-seven percent of them had ever received training related to BPE management; 62% perceived themselves to be at high risk for BPE. Among the 426 HCWs who were exposed to sharps injuries or splashes in the last 6 months, 160 (37%) reported the exposure. Of these, 111 of the 160 (69%) received PEP, and 79 of the 111 (71%) completed their medication. Whereas >92% of the total HCWs had ever been tested for HIV, only 557 (37%) were tested in their own health facility. Most HCWs (87%, n = 1,406) reported they would be interested in testing themselves. Of HCWs who reported an exposure, less than half (49%, n = 78) were satisfied with existing reporting systems. CONCLUSIONS: Underreporting of occupational exposures and dissatisfaction with PEP management is common among HCWs. Improved PEP management strategies and regular monitoring are needed.
Authors: Asa Auta; Emmanuel O Adewuyi; Amom Tor-Anyiin; David Aziz; Esther Ogbole; Brian O Ogbonna; Davies Adeloye Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2017-10-13 Impact factor: 9.408