Literature DB >> 27021469

Slow pathway modification in patients presenting with only two consecutive AV nodal echo beats.

Felix K Wegner1, Maria Silvano2, Nils Bögeholz1, Patrick R Leitz1, Gerrit Frommeyer1, Dirk G Dechering1, Stephan Zellerhoff1, Simon Kochhäuser1, Philipp S Lange1, Julia Köbe1, Kristina Wasmer1, Gerold Mönnig1, Lars Eckardt1, Christian Pott3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Slow pathway modification (SPM) is the therapy of choice for AV-nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT). When AVNRT is not inducible, empirical ablation can be considered, however, the outcome in patients with two AV nodal echo beats (AVNEBs) is unknown.
METHODS: Out of a population of 3003 patients who underwent slow pathway modification at our institution between 1993 and 2013, we retrospectively included 32 patients with a history of symptomatic tachycardia, lack of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (pSVT) inducibility but occurrence of two AVNEBs.
RESULTS: pSVT documentation by electrocardiography (ECG) was present in 20 patients. The procedural endpoint was inducibility of less than two AVNEBs. This was reached in 31 (97%) patients. Long-term success was assessed by a telephone questionnaire (follow-up time 63±9 months). A total 94% of the patients benefited from the procedure (59% freedom from symptoms; 34% improvement in symptoms). Among those patients in whom ECG documentation was not present, 100% benefited (58% freedom from symptoms, 42% improvement).
CONCLUSION: This is the first collective analysis of a group of patients presenting with symptoms of pSVT and inducibility of only two AVNEBs. Procedural success and clinical long-term follow-up were in the range of the reported success rates of slow pathway modification of inducible AVNRT, independent of whether ECG documentation was present. Thus, SPM is a safe and effective therapy in patients with two AVNEBs.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AV node; AV-nodal reentry tachycardia; Electrophysiology; Empirical slow pathway modification; Supraventricular tachycardia

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27021469     DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2016.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiol        ISSN: 0914-5087            Impact factor:   3.159


  4 in total

1.  Occurrence of primarily noninducible atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia after radiofrequency delivery in the slow pathway region during empirical slow pathway modulation.

Authors:  Felix Konrad Wegner; Nils Bögeholz; Patrick Leitz; Gerrit Frommeyer; Dirk Georg Dechering; Simon Kochhäuser; Philipp Sebastian Lange; Julia Köbe; Kristina Wasmer; Gerold Mönnig; Lars Eckardt; Christian Pott
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  Value of an old school approach: safety and long-term success of radiofrequency current catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children and young adolescents.

Authors:  Henrike Siebels; Christian Sohns; Jan-Hendrik Nürnberg; Jürgen Siebels; Klaus Langes; Joachim Hebe
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Prospective blinded evaluation of smartphone-based ECG for differentiation of supraventricular tachycardia from inappropriate sinus tachycardia.

Authors:  Felix K Wegner; Simon Kochhäuser; Gerrit Frommeyer; Philipp S Lange; Christian Ellermann; Patrick Leitz; Patrick Müller; Julia Köbe; Lars Eckardt; Dirk G Dechering
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Clinical impact of "pure" empirical catheter ablation of slow-pathway in patients with non-ECG documented clinical on-off tachycardia.

Authors:  Shqipe Gerguri; Nikesh Jathanna; Tina Lin; Patrick Müller; Lukas Clasen; Jan Schmidt; Muhammed Kurt; Dong-In Shin; Christian Blockhaus; Malte Kelm; Alexander Fürnkranz; Hisaki Makimoto
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.175

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.