Eimad Shotar1, Alexis Guédon1, Nader Sourour1, Federico Di Maria1, Joseph Gabrieli1,2, Aurélien Nouet3, Jacques Chiras1,2, Frédéric Clarençon4,5. 1. Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 47, Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France. 2. Paris VI University, Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France. 4. Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 47, Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France. fredclare5@msn.com. 5. Paris VI University, Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France. fredclare5@msn.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the superficial middle cerebral vein (SMCV) is frequently absent or fails to connect with the cavernous sinus (CS) in the presence of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), a frequently reported argument for the congenital origin of brain AVMs. METHODS: The SMCV was retrospectively compared between patients with a brain AVM and a control group. The presence or absence of the SMCV, its direct or indirect connection to the CS and its termination in a laterocavernous sinus (LCS), paracavernous sinus (PCS), or directly in the CS was studied on digital subtraction angiography. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-five left or right side carotid angiograms from 70 patients with a brain AVM were compared to 125 angiograms from 74 controls. The SMCV was present in 88 (70.4 %) cases in the brain AVM group and 96 (76.8 %) cases in controls (p = 0.25). The SMCV was connected directly or indirectly to the CS in 65 (52 %) cases in the brain AVM group and 65 (52 %) cases in controls (p = 1). When comparing the subgroup of carotid angiograms ipsilateral to a supratentorial AVM, no statistically significant difference was found with controls. In three of six cases in which a SMCV drained an AVM, the vein terminated directly or indirectly in the CS. CONCLUSIONS: No difference of SMCV presence and direct or indirect connection to the CS was found between patients with AVM and a control group. SMCV anatomy does not support the congenital origin of brain AVMs.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the superficial middle cerebral vein (SMCV) is frequently absent or fails to connect with the cavernous sinus (CS) in the presence of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), a frequently reported argument for the congenital origin of brain AVMs. METHODS: The SMCV was retrospectively compared between patients with a brain AVM and a control group. The presence or absence of the SMCV, its direct or indirect connection to the CS and its termination in a laterocavernous sinus (LCS), paracavernous sinus (PCS), or directly in the CS was studied on digital subtraction angiography. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-five left or right side carotid angiograms from 70 patients with a brain AVM were compared to 125 angiograms from 74 controls. The SMCV was present in 88 (70.4 %) cases in the brain AVM group and 96 (76.8 %) cases in controls (p = 0.25). The SMCV was connected directly or indirectly to the CS in 65 (52 %) cases in the brain AVM group and 65 (52 %) cases in controls (p = 1). When comparing the subgroup of carotid angiograms ipsilateral to a supratentorial AVM, no statistically significant difference was found with controls. In three of six cases in which a SMCV drained an AVM, the vein terminated directly or indirectly in the CS. CONCLUSIONS: No difference of SMCV presence and direct or indirect connection to the CS was found between patients with AVM and a control group. SMCV anatomy does not support the congenital origin of brain AVMs.
Authors: Rustam Al-Shahi; Jo J Bhattacharya; David G Currie; Vakis Papanastassiou; Vaughn Ritchie; Richard C Roberts; Robin J Sellar; Charles P Warlow Journal: Stroke Date: 2003-04-17 Impact factor: 7.914