Literature DB >> 27020950

Low-frequency brain stimulation to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex increases the negative impact of social exclusion among those high in personal distress.

Bernadette Mary Fitzgibbon1, Melissa Kirkovski1,2, Neil Wayne Bailey1, Richard Hilton Thomson1, Naomi Eisenberger3, Peter Gregory Enticott2, Paul Bernard Fitzgerald1.   

Abstract

The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is thought to play a key role in the cognitive control of emotion and has therefore, unsurprisingly, been implicated in the regulation of physical pain perception. This brain region may also influence the experience of social pain, which has been shown to activate similar neural networks as seen in response to physical pain. Here, we applied sham or active low-frequency (1 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the left DLPFC, previously shown to exert bilateral effects in pain perception, in healthy participants. Following stimulation, participants played the "Cyberball Task"; an online ball-tossing game in which the subject participant is included or excluded. Compared to sham, rTMS did not modulate behavioural response to social exclusion. However, within the active rTMS group only, greater trait personal distress was related to enhanced negative outcomes to social exclusion. These results add further support to the notion that the effect of brain stimulation is not homogenous across individuals, and indicates the need to consider baseline individual differences when assessing response to brain stimulation. This seems particularly relevant in social neuroscience investigations, where trait factors may have a meaningful effect.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Social pain; dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; personal distress; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; social exclusion

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27020950     DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1166154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Neurosci        ISSN: 1747-0919            Impact factor:   2.083


  5 in total

1.  Hostility bias or sadness bias in excluded individuals: does anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of right VLPFC vs. left DLPFC have a mitigating effect?

Authors:  Joanna Rajchert; Anna Zajenkowska; Iwona Nowakowska; Marta Bodecka-Zych; Agnieszka Abramiuk
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 3.526

2.  Does non-invasive brain stimulation modulate emotional stress reactivity?

Authors:  Fenne M Smits; Dennis J L G Schutter; Jack van Honk; Elbert Geuze
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  No Change in Social Decision-Making Following Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Right Temporoparietal Junction.

Authors:  Laura F Blair-West; Kate E Hoy; Phillip J Hall; Paul B Fitzgerald; Bernadette M Fitzgibbon
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Critical role of the right VLPFC in emotional regulation of social exclusion: a tDCS study.

Authors:  Zhenhong He; Yiqin Lin; Lisheng Xia; Zhenli Liu; Dandan Zhang; Rebecca Elliott
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  The right VLPFC and downregulation of social pain: A TMS study.

Authors:  Zhenhong He; Jun Zhao; Junshi Shen; Nils Muhlert; Rebecca Elliott; Dandan Zhang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 5.038

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.