Jason Bingham1, Michael Lallemand2, Morgan Barron2, John Kuckelman2, Preston Carter2, Kelly Blair2, Matthew Martin2. 1. Department of General Surgery, Madigan Army Medical Center, 9040 Fitzsimmons Drive, Tacoma, WA 98431, USA. Electronic address: jason.r.bingham4.mil@mail.mil. 2. Department of General Surgery, Madigan Army Medical Center, 9040 Fitzsimmons Drive, Tacoma, WA 98431, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Staple line leak after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is a rare but dreaded complication with a reported incidence of 0% to 8%. Many surgeons routinely test the staple line with an intraoperative leak test (IOLT), but there is little evidence to validate this practice. In fact, there is a theoretical concern that the leak test may weaken the staple line and increase the risk of a postop leak. METHODS: Retrospective review of all SGs performed over a 7-year period was conducted. Cases were grouped by whether an IOLT was performed, and compared for the incidence of postop staple line leaks. The ability of the IOLT for identifying a staple line defect and for predicting a postoperative leak was analyzed. RESULTS: Five hundred forty-two SGs were performed between 2007 and 2014. Thirteen patients (2.4%) developed a postop staple line leak. The majority of patients (n = 494, 91%) received an IOLT, including all 13 patients (100%) who developed a subsequent clinical leak. There were no (0%) positive IOLTs and no additional interventions were performed based on the IOLT. The IOLT sensitivity and positive predictive value were both 0%. There was a trend, although not significant, to increase leak rates when a routine IOLT was performed vs no routine IOLT (2.6% vs 0%, P = .6). CONCLUSIONS: The performance of routine IOLT after SG provided no actionable information, and was negative in all patients who developed a postoperative leak. The routine use of an IOLT did not reduce the incidence of postop leak, and in fact was associated with a higher leak rate after SG. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: Staple line leak after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is a rare but dreaded complication with a reported incidence of 0% to 8%. Many surgeons routinely test the staple line with an intraoperative leak test (IOLT), but there is little evidence to validate this practice. In fact, there is a theoretical concern that the leak test may weaken the staple line and increase the risk of a postop leak. METHODS: Retrospective review of all SGs performed over a 7-year period was conducted. Cases were grouped by whether an IOLT was performed, and compared for the incidence of postop staple line leaks. The ability of the IOLT for identifying a staple line defect and for predicting a postoperative leak was analyzed. RESULTS: Five hundred forty-two SGs were performed between 2007 and 2014. Thirteen patients (2.4%) developed a postop staple line leak. The majority of patients (n = 494, 91%) received an IOLT, including all 13 patients (100%) who developed a subsequent clinical leak. There were no (0%) positive IOLTs and no additional interventions were performed based on the IOLT. The IOLT sensitivity and positive predictive value were both 0%. There was a trend, although not significant, to increase leak rates when a routine IOLT was performed vs no routine IOLT (2.6% vs 0%, P = .6). CONCLUSIONS: The performance of routine IOLT after SG provided no actionable information, and was negative in all patients who developed a postoperative leak. The routine use of an IOLT did not reduce the incidence of postop leak, and in fact was associated with a higher leak rate after SG. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bariatric surgery; Intraoperative leak test; Postoperative staple line leak; Sleeve gastrectomy; Sleeve gastrectomy complications; Staple line dehiscence
Authors: Sami A Chadi; Abe Fingerhut; Mariana Berho; Steven R DeMeester; James W Fleshman; Neil H Hyman; David A Margolin; Joseph E Martz; Elisabeth C McLemore; Daniela Molena; Martin I Newman; Janice F Rafferty; Bashar Safar; Anthony J Senagore; Oded Zmora; Steven D Wexner Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2016-09-16 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Natalie Liu; Meghan C Cusack; Manasa Venkatesh; Anisa L Pontes; Grace Shea; Dillon C Svoboda; Jacob A Greenberg; Anne O Lidor; Luke M Funk Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2019-05-08 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Álvaro A B Ferraz; Fernando Santa-Cruz; João Victor Belfort; Vladimir C T Sá; Luciana T Siqueira; José Guido C Araújo-Júnior Journal: Arq Bras Cir Dig Date: 2022-01-05
Authors: G C Kirby; C A W Macano; S M Nyasavajjala; M Sahloul; R Nijjar; M Daskalakis; M Richardson; R Singhal Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) Date: 2017-09-28
Authors: Gennaro Martines; Giovanni Tomasicchio; Arcangelo Picciariello; Rigers Dibra; Giuseppe Trigiante; Giuliano Lantone; Donato Francesco Altomare Journal: Open Med (Wars) Date: 2022-01-19