Robert J Henning1, Abraham Khan2, Ernesto Jimenez2. 1. Department of Medicine, James A. Haley Hospital and the University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida; Department of Surgery, James A. Haley Hospital and the University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida. Electronic address: robert.henning@va.gov. 2. Department of Medicine, James A. Haley Hospital and the University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida; Department of Surgery, James A. Haley Hospital and the University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular myocardial infarctions (MIs) consist of a central area of myocardial necrosis that is surrounded by areas of myocardial injury and ischemia. We hypothesized that chitosan hydrogels, when injected around the perimeter of MIs in rats, could decrease left ventricle (LV) wall stress by the Law of LaPlace, and therefore myocardial oxygen requirements, and prevent the ischemic and injured myocardium from becoming necrotic. In this manner, chitosan gels could limit LV infraction size and LV remodeling. Chitosan hydrogels are liquid at 25°C but gel at 37°C. METHODS: Seventy Sprague-Dawley rats with ligation of the left coronary artery were treated with either Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) or chitosan hydrogel in DMEM, which was injected around the infarct perimeter. Echocardiograms were obtained before MI and at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 wk after MI. Hearts from randomly selected rats were harvested at baseline and at the time of echocardiography for determinations of LV infarct size, remodeling, and histopathology. RESULTS: Infarct sizes as a percentage of the total ventricular myocardium in the DMEM group averaged 17% versus 14% in the chitosan group at 4 wk (P < 0.05), 18% versus 14% at 8 wk (P < 0.01), 19% versus 14% at 12 wk (P < 0.001), and 20% versus 14% at 16 wk (P < 0.001). Injection of chitosan into the infarctions produced LV wall thicknesses in the MI border zones that averaged 0.66 cm at 4 wk, which were greater than the LV wall thicknesses in the border zones of rats treated with DMEM, which averaged 0.33 cm (P < 0.01). Arteriole densities in the MI border zones were 160/mm(2) in the chitosan group but only 92/mm(2) in the DMEM rats (P < 0.01). The left ventricular end-diastolic diameters (LVEDs) in the rats averaged 0.73 cm before MI. After MI, LVED increased in the DMEM rats to 0.84 cm at 2 wk, then 0.89 cm at 4 wk, 0.89 cm at 8 wk, 0.89 m at 12 wk, and 0.87 cm at 16 wk. In contrast, LVED in the chitosan rats were on average 19% smaller in comparison with the DMEM rats (P < 0.05) and did not significantly change in comparison with their baseline LVEDs. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in the rats averaged 83% before infarctions. In the infarction + DMEM group, the LVEFs significantly decreased after MI and averaged 59.7% at 2 wk, 52.5% at 4 wk, 46.1% at 8 wk, 52.4% at 12 wk, and 53.6% at 16 wk (P < 0.05). In the infarction + chitosan-treated rats, the LVEFs were greater and averaged 67.8% at 2 wk (P < 0.02), 68.9% (P < 0.02) at 4 wk, 69% (P < 0.003) at 8 wk, 65.2% at 12 wk (P < 0.05), and 67% at 16 wk (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Chitosan gel can increase LV myocardial wall thickness, decrease infarct size and LV remodeling, and preserve LV contractility.
BACKGROUND:Left ventricular myocardial infarctions (MIs) consist of a central area of myocardial necrosis that is surrounded by areas of myocardial injury and ischemia. We hypothesized that chitosan hydrogels, when injected around the perimeter of MIs in rats, could decrease left ventricle (LV) wall stress by the Law of LaPlace, and therefore myocardial oxygen requirements, and prevent the ischemic and injured myocardium from becoming necrotic. In this manner, chitosan gels could limit LV infraction size and LV remodeling. Chitosan hydrogels are liquid at 25°C but gel at 37°C. METHODS: Seventy Sprague-Dawley rats with ligation of the left coronary artery were treated with either Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) or chitosan hydrogel in DMEM, which was injected around the infarct perimeter. Echocardiograms were obtained before MI and at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 wk after MI. Hearts from randomly selected rats were harvested at baseline and at the time of echocardiography for determinations of LV infarct size, remodeling, and histopathology. RESULTS:Infarct sizes as a percentage of the total ventricular myocardium in the DMEM group averaged 17% versus 14% in the chitosan group at 4 wk (P < 0.05), 18% versus 14% at 8 wk (P < 0.01), 19% versus 14% at 12 wk (P < 0.001), and 20% versus 14% at 16 wk (P < 0.001). Injection of chitosan into the infarctions produced LV wall thicknesses in the MI border zones that averaged 0.66 cm at 4 wk, which were greater than the LV wall thicknesses in the border zones of rats treated with DMEM, which averaged 0.33 cm (P < 0.01). Arteriole densities in the MI border zones were 160/mm(2) in the chitosan group but only 92/mm(2) in the DMEMrats (P < 0.01). The left ventricular end-diastolic diameters (LVEDs) in the rats averaged 0.73 cm before MI. After MI, LVED increased in the DMEMrats to 0.84 cm at 2 wk, then 0.89 cm at 4 wk, 0.89 cm at 8 wk, 0.89 m at 12 wk, and 0.87 cm at 16 wk. In contrast, LVED in the chitosanrats were on average 19% smaller in comparison with the DMEMrats (P < 0.05) and did not significantly change in comparison with their baseline LVEDs. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in the rats averaged 83% before infarctions. In the infarction + DMEM group, the LVEFs significantly decreased after MI and averaged 59.7% at 2 wk, 52.5% at 4 wk, 46.1% at 8 wk, 52.4% at 12 wk, and 53.6% at 16 wk (P < 0.05). In the infarction + chitosan-treated rats, the LVEFs were greater and averaged 67.8% at 2 wk (P < 0.02), 68.9% (P < 0.02) at 4 wk, 69% (P < 0.003) at 8 wk, 65.2% at 12 wk (P < 0.05), and 67% at 16 wk (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Chitosan gel can increase LV myocardial wall thickness, decrease infarct size and LV remodeling, and preserve LV contractility.
Authors: Cristiano Spadaccio; Francesco Nappi; Federico De Marco; Pietro Sedati; Chiara Taffon; Antonio Nenna; Anna Crescenzi; Massimo Chello; Marcella Trombetta; Ivancarmine Gambardella; Alberto Rainer Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2017-01-23 Impact factor: 4.132